{"title":"文化资源与景观保护设计与规划","authors":"T. Murtha, Madeline Brown","doi":"10.1080/14660466.2019.1688060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beginning in the 1990s, anthropologists, archeologists, and allied social scientists recognized the value of scientifically studying landscape as the, “ ... spatial manifestation of the relations between humans and the environment (Crumley and Marquardt 1990, 73).” In the decades that followed, landscape became more than a unifying concept for regional analysis, tightly integrated into archeological and anthropological research and practice. The tools, methods, and approaches evolved, providing an integrated kit for studying humans and their environment at large scales. To date, dozens of projects have left a legacy of data and information about landscape. The human and culturally focused science of landscapes strengthened, but the application of this science for planning and management of resources was limited. Cultural resource planning and preservation initiatives have revisited this gap in recent years (Altschul 2016; Doelle et al. 2016). We view this as a unique time and opportunity to discuss some approaches for integrating cultural resource science of landscape with design, planning, and management of landscapes.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":"166 1","pages":"176 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural resources and landscape conservation design and planning\",\"authors\":\"T. Murtha, Madeline Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14660466.2019.1688060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Beginning in the 1990s, anthropologists, archeologists, and allied social scientists recognized the value of scientifically studying landscape as the, “ ... spatial manifestation of the relations between humans and the environment (Crumley and Marquardt 1990, 73).” In the decades that followed, landscape became more than a unifying concept for regional analysis, tightly integrated into archeological and anthropological research and practice. The tools, methods, and approaches evolved, providing an integrated kit for studying humans and their environment at large scales. To date, dozens of projects have left a legacy of data and information about landscape. The human and culturally focused science of landscapes strengthened, but the application of this science for planning and management of resources was limited. Cultural resource planning and preservation initiatives have revisited this gap in recent years (Altschul 2016; Doelle et al. 2016). We view this as a unique time and opportunity to discuss some approaches for integrating cultural resource science of landscape with design, planning, and management of landscapes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"volume\":\"166 1\",\"pages\":\"176 - 178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2019.1688060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2019.1688060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
从20世纪90年代开始,人类学家、考古学家和相关的社会科学家认识到科学研究景观的价值,“……人与环境关系的空间表现(Crumley and Marquardt 1990,73)。在随后的几十年里,景观不仅仅是一个用于区域分析的统一概念,还与考古学和人类学的研究和实践紧密结合在一起。工具、方法和途径不断发展,为大规模研究人类及其环境提供了一个综合工具包。迄今为止,已有数十个项目留下了关于景观的数据和信息遗产。以人文和文化为中心的景观科学得到加强,但这门科学在资源规划和管理方面的应用有限。近年来,文化资源规划和保护举措重新审视了这一差距(Altschul 2016;Doelle et al. 2016)。我们认为这是一个独特的时间和机会来讨论将景观文化资源科学与景观设计、规划和管理相结合的一些方法。
Cultural resources and landscape conservation design and planning
Beginning in the 1990s, anthropologists, archeologists, and allied social scientists recognized the value of scientifically studying landscape as the, “ ... spatial manifestation of the relations between humans and the environment (Crumley and Marquardt 1990, 73).” In the decades that followed, landscape became more than a unifying concept for regional analysis, tightly integrated into archeological and anthropological research and practice. The tools, methods, and approaches evolved, providing an integrated kit for studying humans and their environment at large scales. To date, dozens of projects have left a legacy of data and information about landscape. The human and culturally focused science of landscapes strengthened, but the application of this science for planning and management of resources was limited. Cultural resource planning and preservation initiatives have revisited this gap in recent years (Altschul 2016; Doelle et al. 2016). We view this as a unique time and opportunity to discuss some approaches for integrating cultural resource science of landscape with design, planning, and management of landscapes.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals