产前遗传咨询:艾米利亚罗马涅(意大利北部)孕前保健的问题和观点

Q3 Nursing
M. Lucci, G. Astolfi, S. Bigoni, A. Baroncini, O. Calabrese, A. Ferlini, G. Parmeggiani, E. Pompili, M. Seri, E. Calzolari
{"title":"产前遗传咨询:艾米利亚罗马涅(意大利北部)孕前保健的问题和观点","authors":"M. Lucci, G. Astolfi, S. Bigoni, A. Baroncini, O. Calabrese, A. Ferlini, G. Parmeggiani, E. Pompili, M. Seri, E. Calzolari","doi":"10.2427/8870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBackground: there are many reasons why a couple may seek specialist genetic counselling about foetal risk. The referral for prenatal genetic counselling of women with a known risk factor during pregnancy has many disadvantages. Despite this, 10-20% of women seek counselling when already pregnant. \nMethods: data on 804 pregnant women out of 2 158 (37.3%) referred for genetic counselling in 2010 to three Clinical Genetic Services were retrospectively analysed. Patients referred only for advanced maternal age were analysed in a separate study. \nResults: the 804 pregnant women were referred for 932 counselling issues. 325 issues (34.9%) were identified during pregnancy and 607 (65.1%) were pre-existing. 81.2% of Italians compared to 41.8% of the non-Italians (P<0.01) had access to counselling before 13 weeks of gestation for risk factors present before pregnancy. An accurate genetic diagnosis was available in 25.0% of cases. In 21.7% of the cases an elevated a priori risk of >10% for the unborn child was established. \nConclusions: genetic services provide 37.3% of counselling to pregnant women. Referral for genetic counselling during pregnancy can require considerable resources and pose significant ethical and organizational challenges. New models of pregnancy care in the community need to be developed. General practitioners and gynaecologists have an important role in the referral and in the defence of equity of access and a more structured approach to the participation of medical geneticists to primary practice should be considered. \n","PeriodicalId":45811,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prenatal genetic counselling: issues and perspectives for pre-conceptional health care in Emilia Romagna (Northern Italy)\",\"authors\":\"M. Lucci, G. Astolfi, S. Bigoni, A. Baroncini, O. Calabrese, A. Ferlini, G. Parmeggiani, E. Pompili, M. Seri, E. Calzolari\",\"doi\":\"10.2427/8870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nBackground: there are many reasons why a couple may seek specialist genetic counselling about foetal risk. The referral for prenatal genetic counselling of women with a known risk factor during pregnancy has many disadvantages. Despite this, 10-20% of women seek counselling when already pregnant. \\nMethods: data on 804 pregnant women out of 2 158 (37.3%) referred for genetic counselling in 2010 to three Clinical Genetic Services were retrospectively analysed. Patients referred only for advanced maternal age were analysed in a separate study. \\nResults: the 804 pregnant women were referred for 932 counselling issues. 325 issues (34.9%) were identified during pregnancy and 607 (65.1%) were pre-existing. 81.2% of Italians compared to 41.8% of the non-Italians (P<0.01) had access to counselling before 13 weeks of gestation for risk factors present before pregnancy. An accurate genetic diagnosis was available in 25.0% of cases. In 21.7% of the cases an elevated a priori risk of >10% for the unborn child was established. \\nConclusions: genetic services provide 37.3% of counselling to pregnant women. Referral for genetic counselling during pregnancy can require considerable resources and pose significant ethical and organizational challenges. New models of pregnancy care in the community need to be developed. General practitioners and gynaecologists have an important role in the referral and in the defence of equity of access and a more structured approach to the participation of medical geneticists to primary practice should be considered. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2427/8870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2427/8870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有很多原因,为什么一对夫妇可能会寻求专家遗传咨询胎儿的风险。在怀孕期间有已知危险因素的妇女转介产前遗传咨询有许多不利之处。尽管如此,仍有10-20%的妇女在怀孕时寻求咨询。方法:回顾性分析2010年向3家临床遗传服务机构提交遗传咨询的2158名孕妇(37.3%)中的804名孕妇的资料。仅因高龄产妇而转诊的患者在另一项研究中进行了分析。结果:804名孕妇被转介咨询932个问题。325例(34.9%)在怀孕期间被发现,607例(65.1%)已经存在。81.2%的意大利人与41.8%的非意大利人相比(未出生的孩子为10%)。结论:遗传服务为孕妇提供了37.3%的咨询。在怀孕期间转介遗传咨询可能需要相当多的资源,并构成重大的道德和组织挑战。需要开发社区妊娠护理的新模式。全科医生和妇科医生在转诊和维护公平机会方面发挥着重要作用,应考虑采取更有组织的办法让医学遗传学家参与初级实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prenatal genetic counselling: issues and perspectives for pre-conceptional health care in Emilia Romagna (Northern Italy)
Background: there are many reasons why a couple may seek specialist genetic counselling about foetal risk. The referral for prenatal genetic counselling of women with a known risk factor during pregnancy has many disadvantages. Despite this, 10-20% of women seek counselling when already pregnant. Methods: data on 804 pregnant women out of 2 158 (37.3%) referred for genetic counselling in 2010 to three Clinical Genetic Services were retrospectively analysed. Patients referred only for advanced maternal age were analysed in a separate study. Results: the 804 pregnant women were referred for 932 counselling issues. 325 issues (34.9%) were identified during pregnancy and 607 (65.1%) were pre-existing. 81.2% of Italians compared to 41.8% of the non-Italians (P<0.01) had access to counselling before 13 weeks of gestation for risk factors present before pregnancy. An accurate genetic diagnosis was available in 25.0% of cases. In 21.7% of the cases an elevated a priori risk of >10% for the unborn child was established. Conclusions: genetic services provide 37.3% of counselling to pregnant women. Referral for genetic counselling during pregnancy can require considerable resources and pose significant ethical and organizational challenges. New models of pregnancy care in the community need to be developed. General practitioners and gynaecologists have an important role in the referral and in the defence of equity of access and a more structured approach to the participation of medical geneticists to primary practice should be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health (EBPH) is a multidisciplinary journal that has two broad aims: -To support the international public health community with publications on health service research, health care management, health policy, and health economics. -To strengthen the evidences on effective preventive interventions. -To advance public health methods, including biostatistics and epidemiology. EBPH welcomes submissions on all public health issues (including topics like eHealth, big data, personalized prevention, epidemiology and risk factors of chronic and infectious diseases); on basic and applied research in epidemiology; and in biostatistics methodology. Primary studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are all welcome, as are research protocols for observational and experimental studies. EBPH aims to be a cross-discipline, international forum for scientific integration and evidence-based policymaking, combining the methodological aspects of epidemiology, biostatistics, and public health research with their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信