硬膜外曲马多、芬太尼、丁丙诺啡术后镇痛效果观察

Lokesh Naik, B. Rao, .. R.PanduNaik
{"title":"硬膜外曲马多、芬太尼、丁丙诺啡术后镇痛效果观察","authors":"Lokesh Naik, B. Rao, .. R.PanduNaik","doi":"10.9790/0853-160603139146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim : To compare postoperative analgesia among epidural Tramadol, Fentanyl & Buprenorphine over first 24 hours in terms of onset of analgesia, duration, quality of analgesia, number of doses, haemodynamic parameters, respiratory rate and side effects. Methods And Materials: This study was a prospective comparative randomized study. After ethical committee approval a total of 60 patients undergoing elective lower limb or lower abdominal surgeries : were divided into three groups (Group T, Group F and Group B) of twenty each. All the patients were premedicated with Tab. Alprazolam 0.25 mg at 10pm night before surgery and Tab.Ranitidine 150 mg at 7am on day of surgery . Results. The demographic profile (age wise and weight wise distribution) was comparable in all the three groups. The onset of analgesia was shortest (3.75 ± 0.36 min) in fentanyl group followed by tramadol (7.76 ± 0.65 min) and buprenorphine (13.98 ± 1.46 min) groups which is statistically significant. The duration of analgesia was 232.25 ± 19.15 min in fentanyl group, 434.75 ± 33.61 min in tramadol group and 1094 ± 27.29 min in buprenorphine group which is statistically significant. The number of doses required in fentanyl group are 6.7 ± 0.7, tramadol group are 4.0 ± 0.0 and buprenorphine group are 2.0 ± 0.0. The quality of analgesia which was assessed using VAS score showed that the score was less than 1 in all the groups during 24hrs of study period. The changes in systolic blood pressures recorded at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 and 24 hrs among the three groups were statistically not significant. The increase observed at 6 and 7 hrs in tramadol and fentanyl groups compared with buprenorphine group was statistically significant which can be explained based on shorter duration of action of tramadol and fentanyl leading to wearing of the analgesic effect. Respiratory rate showed no significant changes at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 and 24 hrs among the three groups statistically. The decrease in respiratory rate in buprenorphine group compared to tramadol and fentanyl groups was statistically significant at 6 and 7 hrs. Conclusion: With advent of newer opioids with fewer side effects, the search for appropriate opioid for epidural administration to provide postoperative pain relief still continues. With the introduction of infusion pump in postoperative ward further research can be directed towards patient controlled analgesia and continuous","PeriodicalId":14489,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Post Operative Analgesia with Epidural Tramadol, Fentanyl And Buprenorphine\",\"authors\":\"Lokesh Naik, B. Rao, .. R.PanduNaik\",\"doi\":\"10.9790/0853-160603139146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim : To compare postoperative analgesia among epidural Tramadol, Fentanyl & Buprenorphine over first 24 hours in terms of onset of analgesia, duration, quality of analgesia, number of doses, haemodynamic parameters, respiratory rate and side effects. Methods And Materials: This study was a prospective comparative randomized study. After ethical committee approval a total of 60 patients undergoing elective lower limb or lower abdominal surgeries : were divided into three groups (Group T, Group F and Group B) of twenty each. All the patients were premedicated with Tab. Alprazolam 0.25 mg at 10pm night before surgery and Tab.Ranitidine 150 mg at 7am on day of surgery . Results. The demographic profile (age wise and weight wise distribution) was comparable in all the three groups. The onset of analgesia was shortest (3.75 ± 0.36 min) in fentanyl group followed by tramadol (7.76 ± 0.65 min) and buprenorphine (13.98 ± 1.46 min) groups which is statistically significant. The duration of analgesia was 232.25 ± 19.15 min in fentanyl group, 434.75 ± 33.61 min in tramadol group and 1094 ± 27.29 min in buprenorphine group which is statistically significant. The number of doses required in fentanyl group are 6.7 ± 0.7, tramadol group are 4.0 ± 0.0 and buprenorphine group are 2.0 ± 0.0. The quality of analgesia which was assessed using VAS score showed that the score was less than 1 in all the groups during 24hrs of study period. The changes in systolic blood pressures recorded at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 and 24 hrs among the three groups were statistically not significant. The increase observed at 6 and 7 hrs in tramadol and fentanyl groups compared with buprenorphine group was statistically significant which can be explained based on shorter duration of action of tramadol and fentanyl leading to wearing of the analgesic effect. Respiratory rate showed no significant changes at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 and 24 hrs among the three groups statistically. The decrease in respiratory rate in buprenorphine group compared to tramadol and fentanyl groups was statistically significant at 6 and 7 hrs. Conclusion: With advent of newer opioids with fewer side effects, the search for appropriate opioid for epidural administration to provide postoperative pain relief still continues. With the introduction of infusion pump in postoperative ward further research can be directed towards patient controlled analgesia and continuous\",\"PeriodicalId\":14489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-160603139146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-160603139146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较曲马多、芬太尼和丁丙诺啡在术后24小时硬膜外镇痛的起效、持续时间、镇痛质量、给药次数、血流动力学参数、呼吸频率和副作用。方法与材料:本研究为前瞻性比较随机研究。经伦理委员会批准,将择期下肢或下腹部手术患者60例分为T组、F组、B组,每组20例。所有患者均预先给予Tab。术前晚10点服用阿普唑仑0.25 mg。雷尼替丁150毫克,手术当天早上7点。结果。人口统计资料(年龄和体重分布)在所有三组中具有可比性。芬太尼组镇痛时间最短,为3.75±0.36 min,其次为曲马多组(7.76±0.65 min),丁丙诺啡组(13.98±1.46 min),差异有统计学意义。芬太尼组镇痛时间为232.25±19.15 min,曲马多组为434.75±33.61 min,丁丙诺啡组为1094±27.29 min,差异有统计学意义。芬太尼组为6.7±0.7次,曲马多组为4.0±0.0次,丁丙诺啡组为2.0±0.0次。采用VAS评分对镇痛质量进行评价,研究期间24小时各组镇痛质量评分均小于1分。各组在0、1、2、3、4、5、8、9、10、11、12、18、24 h收缩压变化均无统计学意义。与丁丙诺啡组相比,曲马多组和芬太尼组在6和7小时的镇痛效果增加有统计学意义,这可能是由于曲马多和芬太尼的作用时间较短,导致镇痛效果减弱。3组患者在0、1、2、3、4、5、8、9、10、11、12、18、24 h呼吸频率差异无统计学意义。与曲马多和芬太尼组相比,丁丙诺啡组呼吸频率在6和7 h时下降有统计学意义。结论:随着副作用更小的新型阿片类药物的出现,寻找合适的阿片类药物用于硬膜外给药以缓解术后疼痛仍在继续。随着输液泵在术后病房的引入,进一步的研究可以指向患者自控镇痛和持续镇痛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Post Operative Analgesia with Epidural Tramadol, Fentanyl And Buprenorphine
Aim : To compare postoperative analgesia among epidural Tramadol, Fentanyl & Buprenorphine over first 24 hours in terms of onset of analgesia, duration, quality of analgesia, number of doses, haemodynamic parameters, respiratory rate and side effects. Methods And Materials: This study was a prospective comparative randomized study. After ethical committee approval a total of 60 patients undergoing elective lower limb or lower abdominal surgeries : were divided into three groups (Group T, Group F and Group B) of twenty each. All the patients were premedicated with Tab. Alprazolam 0.25 mg at 10pm night before surgery and Tab.Ranitidine 150 mg at 7am on day of surgery . Results. The demographic profile (age wise and weight wise distribution) was comparable in all the three groups. The onset of analgesia was shortest (3.75 ± 0.36 min) in fentanyl group followed by tramadol (7.76 ± 0.65 min) and buprenorphine (13.98 ± 1.46 min) groups which is statistically significant. The duration of analgesia was 232.25 ± 19.15 min in fentanyl group, 434.75 ± 33.61 min in tramadol group and 1094 ± 27.29 min in buprenorphine group which is statistically significant. The number of doses required in fentanyl group are 6.7 ± 0.7, tramadol group are 4.0 ± 0.0 and buprenorphine group are 2.0 ± 0.0. The quality of analgesia which was assessed using VAS score showed that the score was less than 1 in all the groups during 24hrs of study period. The changes in systolic blood pressures recorded at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 and 24 hrs among the three groups were statistically not significant. The increase observed at 6 and 7 hrs in tramadol and fentanyl groups compared with buprenorphine group was statistically significant which can be explained based on shorter duration of action of tramadol and fentanyl leading to wearing of the analgesic effect. Respiratory rate showed no significant changes at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 and 24 hrs among the three groups statistically. The decrease in respiratory rate in buprenorphine group compared to tramadol and fentanyl groups was statistically significant at 6 and 7 hrs. Conclusion: With advent of newer opioids with fewer side effects, the search for appropriate opioid for epidural administration to provide postoperative pain relief still continues. With the introduction of infusion pump in postoperative ward further research can be directed towards patient controlled analgesia and continuous
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信