比较子宫环扎术后子宫环扎术作为辅助治疗与单独子宫环扎术预防自发性早产的疗效:一项随机对照试验

Q4 Medicine
M. Moshfeghi, M. Arjmandifar, M. Mohammadi, Mahyar Eftekhari, Khadije Rezaie Keikhaie
{"title":"比较子宫环扎术后子宫环扎术作为辅助治疗与单独子宫环扎术预防自发性早产的疗效:一项随机对照试验","authors":"M. Moshfeghi, M. Arjmandifar, M. Mohammadi, Mahyar Eftekhari, Khadije Rezaie Keikhaie","doi":"10.30699/jogcr.7.5.382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of adjunctive pessary therapy after cerclage in increasing the gestational age (GA) to 37 weeks in women with cervical insufficiency (CI). Materials & Methods: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at the infertility department of Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran. A total of 170 singleton pregnant women aged 18-42 years old, diagnosed with CI by GA 14-24weeks, who had intact membrane with no signs of intrauterine infection, vaginal bleeding, or uterine contraction, were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either cervical cerclage or pessary after cerclage. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth (SPB) (<37weeks). The secondary outcomes were GA at the time of delivery, SPB (less than 34, 32 & 28 weeks), delivery method, neonatal outcomes, maternal adverse events, and maternal satisfaction with the intervention. Results: The incidence of SPB (<37, 34, 32 & 28weeks), method of delivery, GA at time of delivery, and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of vaginal bleeding ( P =0.007) and pelvic pain ( P =0.03) significantly was less in the intervention group. The mean score of satisfaction in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group ( P =0.01). Conclusion: The placement of an adjunctive pessary for pregnant women with singleton pregnancy and CI, did not result in a lower rate of SPB (<37weeks) compared to cerclage alone. However, pregnancy complications after the intervention until delivery were less in these women, while the level of satisfaction was higher.","PeriodicalId":36115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Efficacy of Pessary as an Adjunctive Therapy after Cerclage, and Cerclage Alone in Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"M. Moshfeghi, M. Arjmandifar, M. Mohammadi, Mahyar Eftekhari, Khadije Rezaie Keikhaie\",\"doi\":\"10.30699/jogcr.7.5.382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of adjunctive pessary therapy after cerclage in increasing the gestational age (GA) to 37 weeks in women with cervical insufficiency (CI). Materials & Methods: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at the infertility department of Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran. A total of 170 singleton pregnant women aged 18-42 years old, diagnosed with CI by GA 14-24weeks, who had intact membrane with no signs of intrauterine infection, vaginal bleeding, or uterine contraction, were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either cervical cerclage or pessary after cerclage. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth (SPB) (<37weeks). The secondary outcomes were GA at the time of delivery, SPB (less than 34, 32 & 28 weeks), delivery method, neonatal outcomes, maternal adverse events, and maternal satisfaction with the intervention. Results: The incidence of SPB (<37, 34, 32 & 28weeks), method of delivery, GA at time of delivery, and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of vaginal bleeding ( P =0.007) and pelvic pain ( P =0.03) significantly was less in the intervention group. The mean score of satisfaction in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group ( P =0.01). Conclusion: The placement of an adjunctive pessary for pregnant women with singleton pregnancy and CI, did not result in a lower rate of SPB (<37weeks) compared to cerclage alone. However, pregnancy complications after the intervention until delivery were less in these women, while the level of satisfaction was higher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30699/jogcr.7.5.382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/jogcr.7.5.382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:本研究的目的是评估宫颈功能不全(CI)妇女宫颈环切术后辅助子宫托治疗将胎龄(GA)增加到37周的有效性。材料与方法:本随机对照试验(RCT)在伊朗德黑兰Royan研究所不孕症科进行。共纳入170例年龄在18-42岁、孕14-24周经GA诊断为CI的单胎孕妇,她们的胎膜完整,没有宫内感染、阴道出血或子宫收缩的迹象。患者按1:1随机分组,接受宫颈环扎术或环扎术后子宫内膜环扎术。主要结局为自发性早产(SPB)(<37周)。次要结局是分娩时GA、SPB(小于34周、32周和28周)、分娩方式、新生儿结局、产妇不良事件和产妇对干预的满意度。结果:两组新生儿SPB发生率(<37、34、32、28周)、分娩方式、分娩时GA、新生儿结局无显著差异。干预组阴道出血(P =0.007)、盆腔疼痛(P =0.03)发生率明显低于干预组。干预组患者的平均满意度得分显著高于对照组(P =0.01)。结论:对于单胎妊娠和CI的孕妇,放置辅助子宫托并不会导致SPB(<37周)的发生率低于单纯环扎术。然而,这些妇女在干预后直到分娩的妊娠并发症较少,而满意度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Efficacy of Pessary as an Adjunctive Therapy after Cerclage, and Cerclage Alone in Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background & Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of adjunctive pessary therapy after cerclage in increasing the gestational age (GA) to 37 weeks in women with cervical insufficiency (CI). Materials & Methods: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at the infertility department of Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran. A total of 170 singleton pregnant women aged 18-42 years old, diagnosed with CI by GA 14-24weeks, who had intact membrane with no signs of intrauterine infection, vaginal bleeding, or uterine contraction, were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either cervical cerclage or pessary after cerclage. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth (SPB) (<37weeks). The secondary outcomes were GA at the time of delivery, SPB (less than 34, 32 & 28 weeks), delivery method, neonatal outcomes, maternal adverse events, and maternal satisfaction with the intervention. Results: The incidence of SPB (<37, 34, 32 & 28weeks), method of delivery, GA at time of delivery, and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of vaginal bleeding ( P =0.007) and pelvic pain ( P =0.03) significantly was less in the intervention group. The mean score of satisfaction in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group ( P =0.01). Conclusion: The placement of an adjunctive pessary for pregnant women with singleton pregnancy and CI, did not result in a lower rate of SPB (<37weeks) compared to cerclage alone. However, pregnancy complications after the intervention until delivery were less in these women, while the level of satisfaction was higher.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信