证券监管中引入私人诉权的资本市场效应:来自英国的证据

Fernán Restrepo
{"title":"证券监管中引入私人诉权的资本市场效应:来自英国的证据","authors":"Fernán Restrepo","doi":"10.1086/723789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Securities class actions are among the most controversial topics in the corporate and securities law literature, but despite these actions’ significance, little is known about the impact of their introduction into the legal system. This paper contributes to filling this gap by examining the capital market effects of the adoption of private rights of action (PRAs) in the United Kingdom—a jurisdiction that provides a unique empirical setting for the analysis. The results indicate that the introduction of the rights was associated with enhanced market liquidity and value. Although this finding is most directly relevant to the cost-benefit analysis of private litigation in the United Kingdom, it also suggests that eliminating PRAs in jurisdictions that have adopted them (a reform that has been proposed in the United States) may lead to lower liquidity and market value.","PeriodicalId":22657,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law and Economics","volume":"13 1","pages":"183 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Capital Market Effects of Introducing Private Rights of Action in Securities Regulation: Evidence from the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Fernán Restrepo\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/723789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Securities class actions are among the most controversial topics in the corporate and securities law literature, but despite these actions’ significance, little is known about the impact of their introduction into the legal system. This paper contributes to filling this gap by examining the capital market effects of the adoption of private rights of action (PRAs) in the United Kingdom—a jurisdiction that provides a unique empirical setting for the analysis. The results indicate that the introduction of the rights was associated with enhanced market liquidity and value. Although this finding is most directly relevant to the cost-benefit analysis of private litigation in the United Kingdom, it also suggests that eliminating PRAs in jurisdictions that have adopted them (a reform that has been proposed in the United States) may lead to lower liquidity and market value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Law and Economics\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Law and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/723789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

证券集体诉讼是公司法和证券法文献中最具争议的话题之一,但尽管这些诉讼具有重要意义,但人们对其引入法律体系的影响知之甚少。本文通过考察英国采用私人诉权对资本市场的影响,填补了这一空白。英国的司法管辖区为本文的分析提供了独特的经验背景。结果表明,股权的引入与市场流动性和价值的增强有关。虽然这一发现与联合王国私人诉讼的成本效益分析最直接相关,但它也表明,在采用这种制度的司法管辖区取消这种制度(美国提出的一项改革)可能导致流动性和市场价值降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Capital Market Effects of Introducing Private Rights of Action in Securities Regulation: Evidence from the United Kingdom
Securities class actions are among the most controversial topics in the corporate and securities law literature, but despite these actions’ significance, little is known about the impact of their introduction into the legal system. This paper contributes to filling this gap by examining the capital market effects of the adoption of private rights of action (PRAs) in the United Kingdom—a jurisdiction that provides a unique empirical setting for the analysis. The results indicate that the introduction of the rights was associated with enhanced market liquidity and value. Although this finding is most directly relevant to the cost-benefit analysis of private litigation in the United Kingdom, it also suggests that eliminating PRAs in jurisdictions that have adopted them (a reform that has been proposed in the United States) may lead to lower liquidity and market value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信