科学研究领域的方法论方法

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Keila Aparecida Marques, Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Melo
{"title":"科学研究领域的方法论方法","authors":"Keila Aparecida Marques, Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Melo","doi":"10.5151/SMA2016-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing demand for new knowledge lead in numerous movements in the field of scientific research, regarding the choice of methodology to be used in the understanding of the phenomena studied. In order to present an understanding of the quantitative approach in scientific research, results found that strengthen the intertwining of the two methodological approaches that guide the universe of scientific research. Yet neither method can be considered better at the expense of another, because the advantages and disadvantages in the use of the methods and also the latent features that differ from the methods and their characteristics are considered. These considerations is the relevance highlighted in this study, quantitative and qualitative approaches have been perceived as complementary among researchers in the scientific research universe.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ABORDAGENS METODOLOGICAS NO CAMPO DA PESQUISA CIENTIFICA\",\"authors\":\"Keila Aparecida Marques, Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Melo\",\"doi\":\"10.5151/SMA2016-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The growing demand for new knowledge lead in numerous movements in the field of scientific research, regarding the choice of methodology to be used in the understanding of the phenomena studied. In order to present an understanding of the quantitative approach in scientific research, results found that strengthen the intertwining of the two methodological approaches that guide the universe of scientific research. Yet neither method can be considered better at the expense of another, because the advantages and disadvantages in the use of the methods and also the latent features that differ from the methods and their characteristics are considered. These considerations is the relevance highlighted in this study, quantitative and qualitative approaches have been perceived as complementary among researchers in the scientific research universe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5151/SMA2016-007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5151/SMA2016-007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对新知识的不断增长的需求导致了科学研究领域的许多运动,关于选择用于理解所研究现象的方法。为了呈现对科学研究中定量方法的理解,结果发现,加强了指导科学研究领域的两种方法方法的交织。然而,任何一种方法都不能以牺牲另一种方法为代价而被认为是更好的,因为使用方法的优点和缺点以及与方法不同的潜在特征及其特征都被考虑在内。这些考虑是本研究中突出的相关性,定量和定性方法在科学研究领域的研究人员中被认为是互补的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ABORDAGENS METODOLOGICAS NO CAMPO DA PESQUISA CIENTIFICA
The growing demand for new knowledge lead in numerous movements in the field of scientific research, regarding the choice of methodology to be used in the understanding of the phenomena studied. In order to present an understanding of the quantitative approach in scientific research, results found that strengthen the intertwining of the two methodological approaches that guide the universe of scientific research. Yet neither method can be considered better at the expense of another, because the advantages and disadvantages in the use of the methods and also the latent features that differ from the methods and their characteristics are considered. These considerations is the relevance highlighted in this study, quantitative and qualitative approaches have been perceived as complementary among researchers in the scientific research universe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信