作者、真实性、权威:亚里士多德修辞学与诗学评价

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. T. Kirby
{"title":"作者、真实性、权威:亚里士多德修辞学与诗学评价","authors":"J. T. Kirby","doi":"10.1525/rh.2022.40.2.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay explores a nexus of related concepts—authorship, authenticity, and authority—as they impinge upon one another and on the experience of reading, particularly in the case of “canonical\" authors such as Aristotle. Aristotle’s own Rhetoric and Poetics are considered together in light of these concepts, as well as in terms of seven constraints that operated upon Aristotle as a thinker and writer. Twentieth-century theories of reading are adduced in an examination of the rhetorical dimensions of Aristotle’s own notion of authorship. The essay also examines the rhetorical forces entailed in the editing and publication of authors known only from ancient manuscripts, and in the reading of legal and sacred texts.","PeriodicalId":40200,"journal":{"name":"Res Rhetorica","volume":"222 1","pages":"111 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authorship, Authenticity, Authority: Evaluating Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics\",\"authors\":\"J. T. Kirby\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/rh.2022.40.2.111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay explores a nexus of related concepts—authorship, authenticity, and authority—as they impinge upon one another and on the experience of reading, particularly in the case of “canonical\\\" authors such as Aristotle. Aristotle’s own Rhetoric and Poetics are considered together in light of these concepts, as well as in terms of seven constraints that operated upon Aristotle as a thinker and writer. Twentieth-century theories of reading are adduced in an examination of the rhetorical dimensions of Aristotle’s own notion of authorship. The essay also examines the rhetorical forces entailed in the editing and publication of authors known only from ancient manuscripts, and in the reading of legal and sacred texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Res Rhetorica\",\"volume\":\"222 1\",\"pages\":\"111 - 153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Res Rhetorica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2022.40.2.111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res Rhetorica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2022.40.2.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了作者身份、真实性和权威等相关概念之间的联系,因为它们相互影响,并影响阅读体验,特别是在亚里士多德等“权威”作者的情况下。亚里士多德自己的《修辞学》和《诗学》在这些概念的基础上,以及作为思想家和作家的亚里士多德所受的七个制约因素,被放在一起考虑。二十世纪的阅读理论被引用在亚里士多德自己的作者概念的修辞维度的检查。这篇文章还考察了在编辑和出版仅从古代手稿中知道的作者,以及在法律和神圣文本的阅读中所涉及的修辞力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Authorship, Authenticity, Authority: Evaluating Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics
Abstract:This essay explores a nexus of related concepts—authorship, authenticity, and authority—as they impinge upon one another and on the experience of reading, particularly in the case of “canonical" authors such as Aristotle. Aristotle’s own Rhetoric and Poetics are considered together in light of these concepts, as well as in terms of seven constraints that operated upon Aristotle as a thinker and writer. Twentieth-century theories of reading are adduced in an examination of the rhetorical dimensions of Aristotle’s own notion of authorship. The essay also examines the rhetorical forces entailed in the editing and publication of authors known only from ancient manuscripts, and in the reading of legal and sacred texts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Res Rhetorica
Res Rhetorica HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信