E. Beverly, Rochelle G. Rennie, E. Guseman, A. Rodgers, Amber M. Healy
{"title":"大学人群中糖尿病困扰的高患病率","authors":"E. Beverly, Rochelle G. Rennie, E. Guseman, A. Rodgers, Amber M. Healy","doi":"10.7556/jaoa.2019.099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Context Diabetes distress is an affective condition that addresses an individual's frustrations, worries, and concerns about living with diabetes. It is associated with fewer self-care behaviors, suboptimal glycemic control, and lower quality of life (QOL). For these reasons, diabetes care guidelines recommend routine assessment of diabetes distress. Objective To assess diabetes distress in a university population. Methods This study was conducted using a descriptive, cross-sectional design. Researchers assessed diabetes distress and other psychosocial factors via an electronic anonymous survey among students, faculty, and staff at a large university in the Midwest. Results A total of 173 participants completed the survey (mean [SD] age, 35.1 [16.7] years), with 108 [62.4%] female and 142 [82.1%] white participants). Eighty-five participants had type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and 88 had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Of the 85 T1DM participants, 23 (27.4%) reported high diabetes distress, and 27 (30.7%) T2DM participants reported high diabetes distress. Sixteen T1DM (18.8%) and 15 T2DM (17.0%) participants screened positive for severe depression. Severe depression was associated with high distress for both T1DM and T2DM participants (T1DM: χ2=28.845, P<.001; T2DM: χ2=20.679, P<.001). Participants with T1DM reported more frequent self-care behaviors (mean [SD], 62.3 [17.1] vs 52.2 [19.2]; P<.001), but lower diabetes QOL (63.3 [14.1] vs 68.5 [15.5]; P=.021) compared with T2DM participants. No differences were observed in depressive symptoms, diabetes self-efficacy, and coping styles. Linear regression models showed that high diabetes distress scores (standardized β=.323, P=.025; standardized β=.604, P<.001) were independently associated with higher hemoglobin A1C levels and lower diabetes QOL after controlling for depressive symptoms, age, and gender in T1DM participants. Similarly, high diabetes distress scores (standardized β=.434, P<.001) were associated with lower diabetes QOL in T2DM participants after controlling for the same variables. Conclusion High diabetes distress levels were associated with lower diabetes QOL for both T1DM and T2DM participants. These findings suggest that attending or working at a university may be associated with high diabetes distress scores and lower diabetes QOL. Additional research with a larger, more diverse sample from multiple universities is needed to confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":16639,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"83 1","pages":"556 - 568"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Prevalence of Diabetes Distress in a University Population\",\"authors\":\"E. Beverly, Rochelle G. Rennie, E. Guseman, A. Rodgers, Amber M. Healy\",\"doi\":\"10.7556/jaoa.2019.099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Context Diabetes distress is an affective condition that addresses an individual's frustrations, worries, and concerns about living with diabetes. It is associated with fewer self-care behaviors, suboptimal glycemic control, and lower quality of life (QOL). For these reasons, diabetes care guidelines recommend routine assessment of diabetes distress. Objective To assess diabetes distress in a university population. Methods This study was conducted using a descriptive, cross-sectional design. Researchers assessed diabetes distress and other psychosocial factors via an electronic anonymous survey among students, faculty, and staff at a large university in the Midwest. Results A total of 173 participants completed the survey (mean [SD] age, 35.1 [16.7] years), with 108 [62.4%] female and 142 [82.1%] white participants). Eighty-five participants had type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and 88 had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Of the 85 T1DM participants, 23 (27.4%) reported high diabetes distress, and 27 (30.7%) T2DM participants reported high diabetes distress. Sixteen T1DM (18.8%) and 15 T2DM (17.0%) participants screened positive for severe depression. Severe depression was associated with high distress for both T1DM and T2DM participants (T1DM: χ2=28.845, P<.001; T2DM: χ2=20.679, P<.001). Participants with T1DM reported more frequent self-care behaviors (mean [SD], 62.3 [17.1] vs 52.2 [19.2]; P<.001), but lower diabetes QOL (63.3 [14.1] vs 68.5 [15.5]; P=.021) compared with T2DM participants. No differences were observed in depressive symptoms, diabetes self-efficacy, and coping styles. Linear regression models showed that high diabetes distress scores (standardized β=.323, P=.025; standardized β=.604, P<.001) were independently associated with higher hemoglobin A1C levels and lower diabetes QOL after controlling for depressive symptoms, age, and gender in T1DM participants. Similarly, high diabetes distress scores (standardized β=.434, P<.001) were associated with lower diabetes QOL in T2DM participants after controlling for the same variables. Conclusion High diabetes distress levels were associated with lower diabetes QOL for both T1DM and T2DM participants. These findings suggest that attending or working at a university may be associated with high diabetes distress scores and lower diabetes QOL. Additional research with a larger, more diverse sample from multiple universities is needed to confirm these findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"556 - 568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2019.099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2019.099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
糖尿病痛苦是一种情感状况,解决了个人的挫折,担忧和关注生活与糖尿病。它与自我护理行为较少、血糖控制欠佳和生活质量(QOL)降低有关。由于这些原因,糖尿病护理指南建议对糖尿病困扰进行常规评估。目的了解大学人群糖尿病窘迫状况。方法本研究采用描述性横断面设计。研究人员通过对中西部一所大型大学的学生、教师和工作人员进行电子匿名调查,评估了糖尿病困扰和其他社会心理因素。结果共173名参与者完成调查(平均[SD]年龄35.1[16.7]岁),其中女性108名(62.4%),白人142名(82.1%)。85名参与者患有1型糖尿病(T1DM), 88名患有2型糖尿病(T2DM)。在85名T1DM参与者中,23名(27.4%)报告了高糖尿病窘迫,27名(30.7%)T2DM参与者报告了高糖尿病窘迫。16名T1DM参与者(18.8%)和15名T2DM参与者(17.0%)筛查出重度抑郁症阳性。T1DM和T2DM患者重度抑郁均与高抑郁相关(T1DM: χ2=28.845, P< 0.001;T2dm: χ2=20.679, p < 0.001)。T1DM患者报告更频繁的自我保健行为(mean [SD], 62.3 [17.1] vs 52.2 [19.2];P< 0.001),但糖尿病患者的生活质量较低(63.3 [14.1]vs 68.5 [15.5];P= 0.021)。在抑郁症状、糖尿病自我效能和应对方式方面没有观察到差异。线性回归模型显示,较高的糖尿病困扰评分(标准化β=。323, P = .025;标准化的β=。604, P<.001)与T1DM参与者在控制抑郁症状、年龄和性别后较高的血红蛋白A1C水平和较低的糖尿病生活质量独立相关。同样,高糖尿病痛苦评分(标准化β=。434, P< 0.001)与T2DM参与者较低的糖尿病生活质量相关。结论T2DM和T1DM患者糖尿病焦虑水平高与较低的糖尿病生活质量相关。这些发现表明,在大学就读或工作可能与较高的糖尿病痛苦评分和较低的糖尿病生活质量有关。需要从多所大学获得更大、更多样化的样本进行进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
High Prevalence of Diabetes Distress in a University Population
Abstract Context Diabetes distress is an affective condition that addresses an individual's frustrations, worries, and concerns about living with diabetes. It is associated with fewer self-care behaviors, suboptimal glycemic control, and lower quality of life (QOL). For these reasons, diabetes care guidelines recommend routine assessment of diabetes distress. Objective To assess diabetes distress in a university population. Methods This study was conducted using a descriptive, cross-sectional design. Researchers assessed diabetes distress and other psychosocial factors via an electronic anonymous survey among students, faculty, and staff at a large university in the Midwest. Results A total of 173 participants completed the survey (mean [SD] age, 35.1 [16.7] years), with 108 [62.4%] female and 142 [82.1%] white participants). Eighty-five participants had type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and 88 had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Of the 85 T1DM participants, 23 (27.4%) reported high diabetes distress, and 27 (30.7%) T2DM participants reported high diabetes distress. Sixteen T1DM (18.8%) and 15 T2DM (17.0%) participants screened positive for severe depression. Severe depression was associated with high distress for both T1DM and T2DM participants (T1DM: χ2=28.845, P<.001; T2DM: χ2=20.679, P<.001). Participants with T1DM reported more frequent self-care behaviors (mean [SD], 62.3 [17.1] vs 52.2 [19.2]; P<.001), but lower diabetes QOL (63.3 [14.1] vs 68.5 [15.5]; P=.021) compared with T2DM participants. No differences were observed in depressive symptoms, diabetes self-efficacy, and coping styles. Linear regression models showed that high diabetes distress scores (standardized β=.323, P=.025; standardized β=.604, P<.001) were independently associated with higher hemoglobin A1C levels and lower diabetes QOL after controlling for depressive symptoms, age, and gender in T1DM participants. Similarly, high diabetes distress scores (standardized β=.434, P<.001) were associated with lower diabetes QOL in T2DM participants after controlling for the same variables. Conclusion High diabetes distress levels were associated with lower diabetes QOL for both T1DM and T2DM participants. These findings suggest that attending or working at a university may be associated with high diabetes distress scores and lower diabetes QOL. Additional research with a larger, more diverse sample from multiple universities is needed to confirm these findings.