使用 MCDM 技术评估流体压力对 AA6063 热处理管材弯曲质量的影响

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Vahid Modanloo , Majid Elyasi , Hossein Talebi-Ghadikolaee , Farzad Ahmadi Khatir , Behnam Akhoundi
{"title":"使用 MCDM 技术评估流体压力对 AA6063 热处理管材弯曲质量的影响","authors":"Vahid Modanloo ,&nbsp;Majid Elyasi ,&nbsp;Hossein Talebi-Ghadikolaee ,&nbsp;Farzad Ahmadi Khatir ,&nbsp;Behnam Akhoundi","doi":"10.1016/j.jer.2023.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the bending of aluminum tubes under different fluid pressure and heat treatment conditions. The application of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods was evaluated for selecting the best forming condition considering cross-section ovality, thinning, and thickening of the bent tubes. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used for criteria weighting, and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) were used for alternative ranking. A combination of various types of AA6063 tubes, including as-received (R), annealed (O), and artificial aged (T6), with different fluid pressures (0, 1, 1.8, 3.2, and 3.6 MPa) were assumed to be as the alternatives (forming conditions). The results demonstrate that the ovality and thickening of the bent tubes decrease by increasing the internal fluid pressure. On the other hand, increasing the internal fluid pressure gives rise to an increase in thinning of bent tubes. The O sample has the lowest ovality and thickening while the T6 sample has the lowest thinning. MCDM analysis revealed that the O samples at higher pressures show better bendability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 251-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723001736/pdfft?md5=2b8518097fc88fedbd5732c4f670dd04&pid=1-s2.0-S2307187723001736-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of MCDM techniques to assess fluid pressure on the bending quality of AA6063 heat-treated tubes\",\"authors\":\"Vahid Modanloo ,&nbsp;Majid Elyasi ,&nbsp;Hossein Talebi-Ghadikolaee ,&nbsp;Farzad Ahmadi Khatir ,&nbsp;Behnam Akhoundi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jer.2023.07.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates the bending of aluminum tubes under different fluid pressure and heat treatment conditions. The application of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods was evaluated for selecting the best forming condition considering cross-section ovality, thinning, and thickening of the bent tubes. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used for criteria weighting, and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) were used for alternative ranking. A combination of various types of AA6063 tubes, including as-received (R), annealed (O), and artificial aged (T6), with different fluid pressures (0, 1, 1.8, 3.2, and 3.6 MPa) were assumed to be as the alternatives (forming conditions). The results demonstrate that the ovality and thickening of the bent tubes decrease by increasing the internal fluid pressure. On the other hand, increasing the internal fluid pressure gives rise to an increase in thinning of bent tubes. The O sample has the lowest ovality and thickening while the T6 sample has the lowest thinning. MCDM analysis revealed that the O samples at higher pressures show better bendability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 251-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723001736/pdfft?md5=2b8518097fc88fedbd5732c4f670dd04&pid=1-s2.0-S2307187723001736-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723001736\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187723001736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了铝管在不同流体压力和热处理条件下的弯曲问题。考虑到弯曲管的横截面椭圆度、变薄和变厚,评估了多标准决策(MCDM)方法在选择最佳成型条件中的应用。分析层次过程(AHP)用于标准加权,通过与理想解决方案的相似性排序技术(TOPSIS)和基于比率分析的多目标优化技术(MOORA)用于备选方案排序。假定不同流体压力(0、1、1.8、3.2 和 3.6 MPa)下的各种类型 AA6063 管材组合为替代品(成形条件),包括原样(R)、退火(O)和人工老化(T6)。结果表明,随着内部流体压力的增加,弯管的椭圆度和增厚度都会减小。另一方面,增加内部流体压力会导致弯管变细。O 样品的椭圆度和增厚度最低,而 T6 样品的变薄度最低。MCDM 分析表明,O 样品在较高压力下的弯曲性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of MCDM techniques to assess fluid pressure on the bending quality of AA6063 heat-treated tubes

This paper investigates the bending of aluminum tubes under different fluid pressure and heat treatment conditions. The application of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods was evaluated for selecting the best forming condition considering cross-section ovality, thinning, and thickening of the bent tubes. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used for criteria weighting, and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) were used for alternative ranking. A combination of various types of AA6063 tubes, including as-received (R), annealed (O), and artificial aged (T6), with different fluid pressures (0, 1, 1.8, 3.2, and 3.6 MPa) were assumed to be as the alternatives (forming conditions). The results demonstrate that the ovality and thickening of the bent tubes decrease by increasing the internal fluid pressure. On the other hand, increasing the internal fluid pressure gives rise to an increase in thinning of bent tubes. The O sample has the lowest ovality and thickening while the T6 sample has the lowest thinning. MCDM analysis revealed that the O samples at higher pressures show better bendability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Research
Journal of Engineering Research ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering Research (JER) is a international, peer reviewed journal which publishes full length original research papers, reviews, case studies related to all areas of Engineering such as: Civil, Mechanical, Industrial, Electrical, Computer, Chemical, Petroleum, Aerospace, Architectural, Biomedical, Coastal, Environmental, Marine & Ocean, Metallurgical & Materials, software, Surveying, Systems and Manufacturing Engineering. In particular, JER focuses on innovative approaches and methods that contribute to solving the environmental and manufacturing problems, which exist primarily in the Arabian Gulf region and the Middle East countries. Kuwait University used to publish the Journal "Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering" (ISSN: 1024-8684), which included Science and Engineering articles since 1974. In 2011 the decision was taken to split KJSE into two independent Journals - "Journal of Engineering Research "(JER) and "Kuwait Journal of Science" (KJS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信