霸权与民主的激进化。对Chantal Mouffe的采访

IF 0.1 4区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR FILOSOFIE Pub Date : 2011-12-01 DOI:10.2143/TVF.73.4.2144960

Thomas Decreus, M. Lievens

{"title":"霸权与民主的激进化。对Chantal Mouffe的采访","authors":"Thomas Decreus, M. Lievens","doi":"10.2143/TVF.73.4.2144960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomas Decreus and Matthias Lievens: The concept of hegemony is central throughout your work. In a recent publication in Constellations, Stefan Rummens argued that there exists an ambiguity in your ideas about hegemony and democracy. Following Lefort, he claims that in a democracy, a fundamental distinction should be made between the people as a whole and a particular majority that is in power. This majority can never claim to fully represent the people. He argues that the logic of hegemony, as you and Ernesto Laclau analysed it in Hegemony and","PeriodicalId":53935,"journal":{"name":"TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR FILOSOFIE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hegemony and the Radicalisation of Democracy. An Interview with Chantal Mouffe\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Decreus, M. Lievens\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/TVF.73.4.2144960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thomas Decreus and Matthias Lievens: The concept of hegemony is central throughout your work. In a recent publication in Constellations, Stefan Rummens argued that there exists an ambiguity in your ideas about hegemony and democracy. Following Lefort, he claims that in a democracy, a fundamental distinction should be made between the people as a whole and a particular majority that is in power. This majority can never claim to fully represent the people. He argues that the logic of hegemony, as you and Ernesto Laclau analysed it in Hegemony and\",\"PeriodicalId\":53935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR FILOSOFIE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR FILOSOFIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/TVF.73.4.2144960\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR FILOSOFIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/TVF.73.4.2144960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

Thomas Decreus和Matthias Lievens:霸权的概念贯穿了您的整个作品。Stefan Rummens最近在《星座》(constellation)杂志上发表的一篇文章中指出，你对霸权和民主的看法存在模糊性。继勒福特之后，他声称，在一个民主国家，应该对作为一个整体的人民和掌权的特定多数人进行根本的区分。这个多数永远不能声称自己完全代表人民。他认为霸权的逻辑，正如你和埃内斯托·拉克劳在《霸权和

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hegemony and the Radicalisation of Democracy. An Interview with Chantal Mouffe

Thomas Decreus and Matthias Lievens: The concept of hegemony is central throughout your work. In a recent publication in Constellations, Stefan Rummens argued that there exists an ambiguity in your ideas about hegemony and democracy. Following Lefort, he claims that in a democracy, a fundamental distinction should be made between the people as a whole and a particular majority that is in power. This majority can never claim to fully represent the people. He argues that the logic of hegemony, as you and Ernesto Laclau analysed it in Hegemony and

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR FILOSOFIE PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： In het Tijdschrift voor Filosofie verschijnen thematische bijdragen, historische en kritische studies, literatuuroverzichten, boekbesprekingen en kronieken. Het staat open voor alle actuele stromingen in en voor discussies op de verscheidene domeinen van de filosofie. Het Tijdschrift voor Filosofie bevat bijdragen van filosofen uit verschillende landen. Het besteedt in het bijzonder aandacht aan het wijsgerige leven in Nederland en Vlaanderen en wil op wetenschappelijk niveau het wijsgerig gesprek in het Nederlands bevorderen. Elke bijdrage wordt ‘dubbel blind’ beoordeeld door tenminste twee deskundigen, afkomstig van verschillende universiteiten.