岩石探测的跨孔ERT配置评估:全尺寸物理模型测试

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
L. Nie, Junfeng Shen, Pengfei Zhou, Liu Zhengyu, Pang Yonghao, Wei Zhou, Andong Chen
{"title":"岩石探测的跨孔ERT配置评估:全尺寸物理模型测试","authors":"L. Nie, Junfeng Shen, Pengfei Zhou, Liu Zhengyu, Pang Yonghao, Wei Zhou, Andong Chen","doi":"10.32389/jeeg20-018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Southeast China, the presence of boulders significantly threatens subway construction projects. Undetected boulders could negatively impact the efficiency and safety of subway construction methods that use shield and tunnel-boring machines. Therefore, boulder detection is a necessary step before construction begins. Recently, the cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) method has gained attention as a potential boulder-detection approach in subway construction projects. However, in this method, the detection effect of each electrode configuration still needs to be assessed. In this study, a full-scale physical model test was conducted to determine the optimal electrode configuration for the cross-hole ERT method. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis of three types of electrode configurations, namely, bipole–bipole, dipole–dipole, and pole–tripole, was conducted. The results showed that the detection ability of the bipole–bipole electrode configuration was satisfactory, with very good boulder-detection resolution and sensitivity. Conversely, the resolution of the dipole–dipole electrode configuration, with relatively low signal strength, decreased as boulder distribution became more complex. Although the pole–tripole electrode configuration showed acceptable resolution, the boulder-detection results had many artifacts. Thus, the full-scale physical model test was conducted to thoroughly investigate the cross-hole ERT electrode configurations and determine the influence of boulder distribution on the measurements, with a view on achieving a more efficient application of this method in the field.","PeriodicalId":15748,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics","volume":"20 1","pages":"569-579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-hole ERT Configuration Assessment for Boulder Detection: A Full-scale Physical Model Test\",\"authors\":\"L. Nie, Junfeng Shen, Pengfei Zhou, Liu Zhengyu, Pang Yonghao, Wei Zhou, Andong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.32389/jeeg20-018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Southeast China, the presence of boulders significantly threatens subway construction projects. Undetected boulders could negatively impact the efficiency and safety of subway construction methods that use shield and tunnel-boring machines. Therefore, boulder detection is a necessary step before construction begins. Recently, the cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) method has gained attention as a potential boulder-detection approach in subway construction projects. However, in this method, the detection effect of each electrode configuration still needs to be assessed. In this study, a full-scale physical model test was conducted to determine the optimal electrode configuration for the cross-hole ERT method. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis of three types of electrode configurations, namely, bipole–bipole, dipole–dipole, and pole–tripole, was conducted. The results showed that the detection ability of the bipole–bipole electrode configuration was satisfactory, with very good boulder-detection resolution and sensitivity. Conversely, the resolution of the dipole–dipole electrode configuration, with relatively low signal strength, decreased as boulder distribution became more complex. Although the pole–tripole electrode configuration showed acceptable resolution, the boulder-detection results had many artifacts. Thus, the full-scale physical model test was conducted to thoroughly investigate the cross-hole ERT electrode configurations and determine the influence of boulder distribution on the measurements, with a view on achieving a more efficient application of this method in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"569-579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32389/jeeg20-018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32389/jeeg20-018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国东南地区,巨砾的存在严重威胁着地铁建设项目。未被发现的巨砾会对使用盾构机和隧道掘进机的地铁施工方法的效率和安全性产生负面影响。因此,巨石检测是施工前的必要步骤。近年来,井间电阻率层析成像(ERT)方法作为一种有潜力的地铁工程中的抱石探测方法受到了广泛的关注。然而,在这种方法中,仍然需要评估每种电极配置的检测效果。在本研究中,进行了全尺寸物理模型试验,以确定交叉孔ERT方法的最佳电极配置。此外,对三种类型的电极结构进行了灵敏度分析,即双极-双极、偶极-偶极和极-三极。结果表明,双极-双极电极结构的检测能力令人满意,具有很好的检石分辨率和灵敏度。相反,信号强度相对较低的偶极-偶极电极结构的分辨率随着岩石分布变得更复杂而降低。虽然极-三极电极结构显示出可接受的分辨率,但巨石检测结果有许多伪影。因此,为了更有效地在现场应用该方法,我们进行了全尺寸物理模型试验,以深入研究跨孔ERT电极配置,并确定岩石分布对测量结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-hole ERT Configuration Assessment for Boulder Detection: A Full-scale Physical Model Test
In Southeast China, the presence of boulders significantly threatens subway construction projects. Undetected boulders could negatively impact the efficiency and safety of subway construction methods that use shield and tunnel-boring machines. Therefore, boulder detection is a necessary step before construction begins. Recently, the cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) method has gained attention as a potential boulder-detection approach in subway construction projects. However, in this method, the detection effect of each electrode configuration still needs to be assessed. In this study, a full-scale physical model test was conducted to determine the optimal electrode configuration for the cross-hole ERT method. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis of three types of electrode configurations, namely, bipole–bipole, dipole–dipole, and pole–tripole, was conducted. The results showed that the detection ability of the bipole–bipole electrode configuration was satisfactory, with very good boulder-detection resolution and sensitivity. Conversely, the resolution of the dipole–dipole electrode configuration, with relatively low signal strength, decreased as boulder distribution became more complex. Although the pole–tripole electrode configuration showed acceptable resolution, the boulder-detection results had many artifacts. Thus, the full-scale physical model test was conducted to thoroughly investigate the cross-hole ERT electrode configurations and determine the influence of boulder distribution on the measurements, with a view on achieving a more efficient application of this method in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics
Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The JEEG (ISSN 1083-1363) is the peer-reviewed journal of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society (EEGS). JEEG welcomes manuscripts on new developments in near-surface geophysics applied to environmental, engineering, and mining issues, as well as novel near-surface geophysics case histories and descriptions of new hardware aimed at the near-surface geophysics community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信