遗传学和物理学中的对比因果关系

Q4 Arts and Humanities

Argumenta Philosophica Pub Date : 2015-01-02 DOI:10.21825/philosophica.82123

E. Weber, Inge De Bal

{"title":"遗传学和物理学中的对比因果关系","authors":"E. Weber, Inge De Bal","doi":"10.21825/philosophica.82123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jonathan Schaffer has argued that a contrastive causal ontology is beneficial in juridical contexts: lawyers and judges should treat the causal relation as a quaternary relation, not as binary one. In this paper we investigate to what extent a contrastive causal ontology is beneficial in genetics and in physics. We conclude that it is beneficial in these scientific domains. We also point out that the nature of the benefit differs in the three context (law, genetics, physics) that we discuss.","PeriodicalId":36843,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Philosophica","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrastive causation in genetics and in physics\",\"authors\":\"E. Weber, Inge De Bal\",\"doi\":\"10.21825/philosophica.82123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jonathan Schaffer has argued that a contrastive causal ontology is beneficial in juridical contexts: lawyers and judges should treat the causal relation as a quaternary relation, not as binary one. In this paper we investigate to what extent a contrastive causal ontology is beneficial in genetics and in physics. We conclude that it is beneficial in these scientific domains. We also point out that the nature of the benefit differs in the three context (law, genetics, physics) that we discuss.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argumenta Philosophica\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argumenta Philosophica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumenta Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

乔纳森·谢弗(Jonathan Schaffer)认为，对比因果本体论在司法语境中是有益的:律师和法官应该将因果关系视为四元关系，而不是二元关系。在本文中，我们探讨了对比因果本体论在多大程度上有利于遗传学和物理学。我们的结论是，它在这些科学领域是有益的。我们还指出，在我们讨论的三种情况下(法律、遗传学、物理学)，好处的性质是不同的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Contrastive causation in genetics and in physics

Jonathan Schaffer has argued that a contrastive causal ontology is beneficial in juridical contexts: lawyers and judges should treat the causal relation as a quaternary relation, not as binary one. In this paper we investigate to what extent a contrastive causal ontology is beneficial in genetics and in physics. We conclude that it is beneficial in these scientific domains. We also point out that the nature of the benefit differs in the three context (law, genetics, physics) that we discuss.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Argumenta Philosophica Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量