安全相关软件的验证和确认技术

EWICS (European Workshop on Industrial Computer Systems) TC7 Software Sub-group
{"title":"安全相关软件的验证和确认技术","authors":"EWICS (European Workshop on Industrial Computer Systems) TC7 Software Sub-group","doi":"10.1016/0167-8051(85)90023-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Several techniques for verification and validation of safety related software are described in the form of structured texts. The techniques include static logic analysis, testing, reliability assessment by probabilistic methods and some specialities about the test of data bases. The most relevant techniques have been selected. Their description in their various subforms includes their aims, the necessary prerequisites, their major advantages and their drawbacks. Statements are added about recommendability, the results provided, relationships to other methods and whether or not assisting tools are available.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100323,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Standards","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 101-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-8051(85)90023-3","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techniques for verification and validation of safety-related software\",\"authors\":\"EWICS (European Workshop on Industrial Computer Systems) TC7 Software Sub-group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0167-8051(85)90023-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Several techniques for verification and validation of safety related software are described in the form of structured texts. The techniques include static logic analysis, testing, reliability assessment by probabilistic methods and some specialities about the test of data bases. The most relevant techniques have been selected. Their description in their various subforms includes their aims, the necessary prerequisites, their major advantages and their drawbacks. Statements are added about recommendability, the results provided, relationships to other methods and whether or not assisting tools are available.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Standards\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 101-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-8051(85)90023-3\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167805185900233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167805185900233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

以结构化文本的形式描述了安全相关软件的几种验证和确认技术。这些技术包括静态逻辑分析、测试、基于概率方法的可靠性评估以及数据库测试的一些专业知识。选择了最相关的技术。它们在各种子形式中的描述包括它们的目标、必要的先决条件、它们的主要优点和缺点。增加了关于可推荐性、提供的结果、与其他方法的关系以及是否有辅助工具的陈述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techniques for verification and validation of safety-related software

Several techniques for verification and validation of safety related software are described in the form of structured texts. The techniques include static logic analysis, testing, reliability assessment by probabilistic methods and some specialities about the test of data bases. The most relevant techniques have been selected. Their description in their various subforms includes their aims, the necessary prerequisites, their major advantages and their drawbacks. Statements are added about recommendability, the results provided, relationships to other methods and whether or not assisting tools are available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信