硫酸镁与口服硝苯地平治疗急性早产的疗效和安全性比较

Rukhsana Saleem, Sara Akram, Farzana Sabir, R. Salam, Nasreen Akhtar, Nimra Bashir, S. Saeed
{"title":"硫酸镁与口服硝苯地平治疗急性早产的疗效和安全性比较","authors":"Rukhsana Saleem, Sara Akram, Farzana Sabir, R. Salam, Nasreen Akhtar, Nimra Bashir, S. Saeed","doi":"10.53350/pjmhs2023176168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of magnesium sulphate and oral nifedipine in acute tocolysis of preterm labor. Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and duration of study: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, DHQ Hospital, Mirpur from 19th October 2019 to 18th April 2020. Methodology: This study included 178 pregnant women with singletons (18 to 40 years of age) assessed through ultrasonography and presented preterm labor. Pregnant women having fetal growth restriction, fetal death, severe preeclampsia, fetal distress, hyperthyroidism,any maternal contraindication for the use of tocolytic drugs, cardiovascular disease, abruptio placentae or placenta-previa were placed in the seclusion criteria of the study. In the group A, oral loading dose of nifedipine 20mg was given. While in group B, magnesium sulphate was injected intravenously with a loading dose of 4 grams over 15 minutes followed by maintenance dose of 2-3 grams/hr. All patients in both groups were evaluated by the researcher herself for prolongation of pregnancy at 48 hours after the start of treatment and efficacy and safety was noted. Results: Efficacy was seen in 80 (89.89%) in group A (Oral nifedipine) and 67 (75.28%) in group B (magnesium sulfate) with p0.019. Safety was seen in 72 (80.90%) in group B (magnesium sulfate) and 83 (93.26%) in group A (oral nifedipine) with p 0.014. Practical Implication: The administration of corticosteroids and also assist in reducing mortality and morbidity related with preterm labor events. Conclusion: This study concluded that oral nifedipine is efficacious and safe than magnesium sulphate for acute tocolysis of preterm labour. Keywords: Tocolytic Agents, Preterm Birth, Magnesium Sulphate.","PeriodicalId":19842,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Magnesium Sulphate Versus oral Nifedipine in Acute Tocolysis of Preterm Labour\",\"authors\":\"Rukhsana Saleem, Sara Akram, Farzana Sabir, R. Salam, Nasreen Akhtar, Nimra Bashir, S. Saeed\",\"doi\":\"10.53350/pjmhs2023176168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of magnesium sulphate and oral nifedipine in acute tocolysis of preterm labor. Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and duration of study: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, DHQ Hospital, Mirpur from 19th October 2019 to 18th April 2020. Methodology: This study included 178 pregnant women with singletons (18 to 40 years of age) assessed through ultrasonography and presented preterm labor. Pregnant women having fetal growth restriction, fetal death, severe preeclampsia, fetal distress, hyperthyroidism,any maternal contraindication for the use of tocolytic drugs, cardiovascular disease, abruptio placentae or placenta-previa were placed in the seclusion criteria of the study. In the group A, oral loading dose of nifedipine 20mg was given. While in group B, magnesium sulphate was injected intravenously with a loading dose of 4 grams over 15 minutes followed by maintenance dose of 2-3 grams/hr. All patients in both groups were evaluated by the researcher herself for prolongation of pregnancy at 48 hours after the start of treatment and efficacy and safety was noted. Results: Efficacy was seen in 80 (89.89%) in group A (Oral nifedipine) and 67 (75.28%) in group B (magnesium sulfate) with p0.019. Safety was seen in 72 (80.90%) in group B (magnesium sulfate) and 83 (93.26%) in group A (oral nifedipine) with p 0.014. Practical Implication: The administration of corticosteroids and also assist in reducing mortality and morbidity related with preterm labor events. Conclusion: This study concluded that oral nifedipine is efficacious and safe than magnesium sulphate for acute tocolysis of preterm labour. Keywords: Tocolytic Agents, Preterm Birth, Magnesium Sulphate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2023176168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2023176168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较硫酸镁与口服硝苯地平治疗急性早产的疗效和安全性。研究设计:随机对照试验。研究地点和时间:2019年10月19日至2020年4月18日,印度米尔普尔DHQ医院妇产科。方法:本研究纳入178例单胎孕妇(18至40岁),通过超声检查评估并表现为早产。有胎儿生长受限、胎儿死亡、严重先兆子痫、胎儿窘迫、甲状腺功能亢进、任何母体使用溶胎药物禁忌症、心血管疾病、胎盘早剥或胎盘前置的孕妇被置于研究的隔离标准中。A组给予硝苯地平口服负荷剂量20mg。B组在15分钟内静脉注射4克硫酸镁,维持剂量为2-3克/小时。两组患者均在治疗开始后48小时由研究者自行评估妊娠延长情况,并评价其有效性和安全性。结果:A组(口服硝苯地平)有效率80例(89.89%),B组(硫酸镁)有效率67例(75.28%),p < 0.019。B组(硫酸镁)72例(80.90%),A组(口服硝苯地平)83例(93.26%),p < 0.014。实际意义:皮质类固醇的使用也有助于降低与早产事件相关的死亡率和发病率。结论:口服硝苯地平治疗急性早产比硫酸镁有效、安全。关键词:抗早产药物,早产,硫酸镁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Magnesium Sulphate Versus oral Nifedipine in Acute Tocolysis of Preterm Labour
Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of magnesium sulphate and oral nifedipine in acute tocolysis of preterm labor. Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Place and duration of study: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, DHQ Hospital, Mirpur from 19th October 2019 to 18th April 2020. Methodology: This study included 178 pregnant women with singletons (18 to 40 years of age) assessed through ultrasonography and presented preterm labor. Pregnant women having fetal growth restriction, fetal death, severe preeclampsia, fetal distress, hyperthyroidism,any maternal contraindication for the use of tocolytic drugs, cardiovascular disease, abruptio placentae or placenta-previa were placed in the seclusion criteria of the study. In the group A, oral loading dose of nifedipine 20mg was given. While in group B, magnesium sulphate was injected intravenously with a loading dose of 4 grams over 15 minutes followed by maintenance dose of 2-3 grams/hr. All patients in both groups were evaluated by the researcher herself for prolongation of pregnancy at 48 hours after the start of treatment and efficacy and safety was noted. Results: Efficacy was seen in 80 (89.89%) in group A (Oral nifedipine) and 67 (75.28%) in group B (magnesium sulfate) with p0.019. Safety was seen in 72 (80.90%) in group B (magnesium sulfate) and 83 (93.26%) in group A (oral nifedipine) with p 0.014. Practical Implication: The administration of corticosteroids and also assist in reducing mortality and morbidity related with preterm labor events. Conclusion: This study concluded that oral nifedipine is efficacious and safe than magnesium sulphate for acute tocolysis of preterm labour. Keywords: Tocolytic Agents, Preterm Birth, Magnesium Sulphate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信