用平均naep值来检验学生成绩有多合理?1

Gregory J. Marchant
{"title":"用平均naep值来检验学生成绩有多合理?1","authors":"Gregory J. Marchant","doi":"10.2466/03.CP.4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Software limitations and difficulty of use have led to some using averaged values instead of plausible values. This study compared the results of plausible values using AM Statistical Software with averaged values using SPSS for descriptive statistics multiple regressions using the 2009 4th and 8th grade math and reading National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) for the total sample in addition to a subsample of Native American students. Gender and poverty and absenteeism and enjoyment of the subject material were used in separate equations to predict achievement. The subgroup means were almost identical, but differences were evident in the standard deviations. The regressions yielded similar results for both approaches. The results suggested that averaged values might present a viable, although not ideal, approach to plausible values.","PeriodicalId":37202,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","volume":"215 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How plausible is using averaged naep values to examine student achievement?1\",\"authors\":\"Gregory J. Marchant\",\"doi\":\"10.2466/03.CP.4.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Software limitations and difficulty of use have led to some using averaged values instead of plausible values. This study compared the results of plausible values using AM Statistical Software with averaged values using SPSS for descriptive statistics multiple regressions using the 2009 4th and 8th grade math and reading National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) for the total sample in addition to a subsample of Native American students. Gender and poverty and absenteeism and enjoyment of the subject material were used in separate equations to predict achievement. The subgroup means were almost identical, but differences were evident in the standard deviations. The regressions yielded similar results for both approaches. The results suggested that averaged values might present a viable, although not ideal, approach to plausible values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"215 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.4.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

软件的限制和使用的困难导致一些人使用平均值而不是合理的值。本研究使用AM统计软件比较似然值的结果与使用SPSS进行描述性统计的平均值,并对2009年4年级和8年级美国国家教育进步评估(NAEP)的总样本以及美洲原住民学生的子样本进行多元回归。性别、贫穷、缺勤和对科目材料的享受被用在单独的方程中来预测成绩。亚组均值几乎相同,但标准差差异明显。两种方法的回归结果相似。结果表明,平均值可能是一种可行的(尽管不是理想的)似是而非的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How plausible is using averaged naep values to examine student achievement?1
Abstract Software limitations and difficulty of use have led to some using averaged values instead of plausible values. This study compared the results of plausible values using AM Statistical Software with averaged values using SPSS for descriptive statistics multiple regressions using the 2009 4th and 8th grade math and reading National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) for the total sample in addition to a subsample of Native American students. Gender and poverty and absenteeism and enjoyment of the subject material were used in separate equations to predict achievement. The subgroup means were almost identical, but differences were evident in the standard deviations. The regressions yielded similar results for both approaches. The results suggested that averaged values might present a viable, although not ideal, approach to plausible values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology
Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信