次模最大化中效用与公平的平衡

Yanhao Wang, Yuchen Li, F. Bonchi, Ying Wang
{"title":"次模最大化中效用与公平的平衡","authors":"Yanhao Wang, Yuchen Li, F. Bonchi, Ying Wang","doi":"10.48786/edbt.2024.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Submodular function maximization is a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem with plenty of applications -- including data summarization, influence maximization, and recommendation. In many of these problems, the goal is to find a solution that maximizes the average utility over all users, for each of whom the utility is defined by a monotone submodular function. However, when the population of users is composed of several demographic groups, another critical problem is whether the utility is fairly distributed across different groups. Although the \\emph{utility} and \\emph{fairness} objectives are both desirable, they might contradict each other, and, to the best of our knowledge, little attention has been paid to optimizing them jointly. To fill this gap, we propose a new problem called \\emph{Bicriteria Submodular Maximization} (BSM) to balance utility and fairness. Specifically, it requires finding a fixed-size solution to maximize the utility function, subject to the value of the fairness function not being below a threshold. Since BSM is inapproximable within any constant factor, we focus on designing efficient instance-dependent approximation schemes. Our algorithmic proposal comprises two methods, with different approximation factors, obtained by converting a BSM instance into other submodular optimization problem instances. Using real-world and synthetic datasets, we showcase applications of our proposed methods in three submodular maximization problems: maximum coverage, influence maximization, and facility location.","PeriodicalId":88813,"journal":{"name":"Advances in database technology : proceedings. International Conference on Extending Database Technology","volume":"51 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Utility and Fairness in Submodular Maximization\",\"authors\":\"Yanhao Wang, Yuchen Li, F. Bonchi, Ying Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.48786/edbt.2024.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Submodular function maximization is a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem with plenty of applications -- including data summarization, influence maximization, and recommendation. In many of these problems, the goal is to find a solution that maximizes the average utility over all users, for each of whom the utility is defined by a monotone submodular function. However, when the population of users is composed of several demographic groups, another critical problem is whether the utility is fairly distributed across different groups. Although the \\\\emph{utility} and \\\\emph{fairness} objectives are both desirable, they might contradict each other, and, to the best of our knowledge, little attention has been paid to optimizing them jointly. To fill this gap, we propose a new problem called \\\\emph{Bicriteria Submodular Maximization} (BSM) to balance utility and fairness. Specifically, it requires finding a fixed-size solution to maximize the utility function, subject to the value of the fairness function not being below a threshold. Since BSM is inapproximable within any constant factor, we focus on designing efficient instance-dependent approximation schemes. Our algorithmic proposal comprises two methods, with different approximation factors, obtained by converting a BSM instance into other submodular optimization problem instances. Using real-world and synthetic datasets, we showcase applications of our proposed methods in three submodular maximization problems: maximum coverage, influence maximization, and facility location.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in database technology : proceedings. International Conference on Extending Database Technology\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in database technology : proceedings. International Conference on Extending Database Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48786/edbt.2024.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in database technology : proceedings. International Conference on Extending Database Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48786/edbt.2024.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

子模块函数最大化是一个具有大量应用的基本组合优化问题,包括数据汇总、影响最大化和推荐。在许多这样的问题中,目标是找到一个解决方案,使所有用户的平均效用最大化,其中每个用户的效用由单调子模函数定义。然而,当用户人口由几个人口统计组组成时,另一个关键问题是效用是否在不同的组之间公平分布。尽管\emph{效用}和\emph{公平}目标都是可取的,但它们可能相互矛盾,而且据我们所知,很少有人关注如何同时优化它们。为了填补这一空白,我们提出了一个新的问题,\emph{称为双标准次模最大化}(BSM)来平衡效用和公平性。具体来说,它需要找到一个固定大小的解决方案来最大化效用函数,前提是公平函数的值不低于阈值。由于BSM在任何常数因子内都是不可近似的,因此我们着重于设计有效的依赖实例的近似方案。我们提出的算法包括两种方法,它们具有不同的近似因子,通过将一个BSM实例转化为其他子模块优化问题实例来获得。使用真实世界和合成数据集,我们展示了我们提出的方法在三个子模块最大化问题中的应用:最大覆盖范围、影响最大化和设施位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing Utility and Fairness in Submodular Maximization
Submodular function maximization is a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem with plenty of applications -- including data summarization, influence maximization, and recommendation. In many of these problems, the goal is to find a solution that maximizes the average utility over all users, for each of whom the utility is defined by a monotone submodular function. However, when the population of users is composed of several demographic groups, another critical problem is whether the utility is fairly distributed across different groups. Although the \emph{utility} and \emph{fairness} objectives are both desirable, they might contradict each other, and, to the best of our knowledge, little attention has been paid to optimizing them jointly. To fill this gap, we propose a new problem called \emph{Bicriteria Submodular Maximization} (BSM) to balance utility and fairness. Specifically, it requires finding a fixed-size solution to maximize the utility function, subject to the value of the fairness function not being below a threshold. Since BSM is inapproximable within any constant factor, we focus on designing efficient instance-dependent approximation schemes. Our algorithmic proposal comprises two methods, with different approximation factors, obtained by converting a BSM instance into other submodular optimization problem instances. Using real-world and synthetic datasets, we showcase applications of our proposed methods in three submodular maximization problems: maximum coverage, influence maximization, and facility location.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信