{"title":"临床信息对数字胸片解释影响的评价","authors":"A. Vasil’ev, V. Nechaev","doi":"10.52560/2713-0118-2022-3-67-73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the impact of the availability and accuracy of the patient’s clinical, laboratory and anamnestic data on the conclusion of a radiologist was evaluated. To achieve this goal, three groups of protocols of 60 digital chest radiographs performed by five radiologists with different work experience were compared. At the first stage, a set of radiographs was provided without additional information, at the second stage — with reliable brief clinical, laboratory and anamnestic data and at the third stage - with unreliable data. As a result, it was shown that the availability of reliable and accurate clinical information is important for the interpretation of chest radiographs.","PeriodicalId":51864,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Research and Practice","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the influence of clinical information on the interpretation of digital chest radiographs\",\"authors\":\"A. Vasil’ev, V. Nechaev\",\"doi\":\"10.52560/2713-0118-2022-3-67-73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the impact of the availability and accuracy of the patient’s clinical, laboratory and anamnestic data on the conclusion of a radiologist was evaluated. To achieve this goal, three groups of protocols of 60 digital chest radiographs performed by five radiologists with different work experience were compared. At the first stage, a set of radiographs was provided without additional information, at the second stage — with reliable brief clinical, laboratory and anamnestic data and at the third stage - with unreliable data. As a result, it was shown that the availability of reliable and accurate clinical information is important for the interpretation of chest radiographs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-3-67-73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-3-67-73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the influence of clinical information on the interpretation of digital chest radiographs
In this study, the impact of the availability and accuracy of the patient’s clinical, laboratory and anamnestic data on the conclusion of a radiologist was evaluated. To achieve this goal, three groups of protocols of 60 digital chest radiographs performed by five radiologists with different work experience were compared. At the first stage, a set of radiographs was provided without additional information, at the second stage — with reliable brief clinical, laboratory and anamnestic data and at the third stage - with unreliable data. As a result, it was shown that the availability of reliable and accurate clinical information is important for the interpretation of chest radiographs.
期刊介绍:
Radiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes articles on all areas of medical imaging. The journal promotes evidence-based radiology practice though the publication of original research, reviews, and clinical studies for a multidisciplinary audience. Radiology Research and Practice is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. For more information on Article Processing charges in gen