论乌托邦的子宫:托马斯·莫尔《乌托邦》中身体的殖民化与父权乌托邦的诞生

Coolabah Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1344/CO20213148-66
A. Jiménez
{"title":"论乌托邦的子宫:托马斯·莫尔《乌托邦》中身体的殖民化与父权乌托邦的诞生","authors":"A. Jiménez","doi":"10.1344/CO20213148-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following European exploration of the Atlantic, origin myths could now be projected onto a possible future and ‘undiscovered’ lands. Often the island proved the most suitable design for these projections to ensure the ‘perfection’ of the community and avoidance of corruptive external influences. These novel conceptualisations envisaged new social constructs to explain human nature, however, they continued to be overtly patriarchal. Gender essentialism and colonisation of the female body was an integral part of reproducing traditional utopian imaginings. Thomas More’s Utopia exemplifies this archetypal gendered conceptualisation of the ideal island society where female education serves to reinforce patriarchal structures and women are essentialised in terms of their fertility. This paper addresses the relationship between the geography of Utopia and the insularity and confinement of women as dominated ‘matrixial entities’ which is further reinforced by utopian cartography. In this context, I assert that the process of colonisation and islanding unsettles the immutability of these patriarchal constructs and exposes the dystopian origins of Utopia.","PeriodicalId":10741,"journal":{"name":"Coolabah","volume":"12 1","pages":"48-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Utopus’ uterus: The colonisation of the body and the birth of patriarchal utopia in Thomas More’s Utopia\",\"authors\":\"A. Jiménez\",\"doi\":\"10.1344/CO20213148-66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following European exploration of the Atlantic, origin myths could now be projected onto a possible future and ‘undiscovered’ lands. Often the island proved the most suitable design for these projections to ensure the ‘perfection’ of the community and avoidance of corruptive external influences. These novel conceptualisations envisaged new social constructs to explain human nature, however, they continued to be overtly patriarchal. Gender essentialism and colonisation of the female body was an integral part of reproducing traditional utopian imaginings. Thomas More’s Utopia exemplifies this archetypal gendered conceptualisation of the ideal island society where female education serves to reinforce patriarchal structures and women are essentialised in terms of their fertility. This paper addresses the relationship between the geography of Utopia and the insularity and confinement of women as dominated ‘matrixial entities’ which is further reinforced by utopian cartography. In this context, I assert that the process of colonisation and islanding unsettles the immutability of these patriarchal constructs and exposes the dystopian origins of Utopia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coolabah\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"48-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coolabah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1344/CO20213148-66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coolabah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/CO20213148-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着欧洲人对大西洋的探索,起源神话现在可以投射到一个可能的未来和“未被发现的”土地上。通常情况下,岛屿被证明是最适合这些项目的设计,以确保社区的“完美”,并避免腐败的外部影响。这些新的概念化设想了新的社会结构来解释人性,然而,它们仍然是明显的父权制。性别本质主义和女性身体的殖民化是再现传统乌托邦想象的一个组成部分。托马斯·莫尔的《乌托邦》体现了理想岛屿社会的性别概念化原型,其中女性教育强化了父权结构,女性在生育能力方面被本质化。本文探讨了乌托邦的地理与女性作为主导的“物质实体”的孤立和限制之间的关系,这种关系在乌托邦制图中得到了进一步的强化。在这种背景下,我断言殖民化和孤岛化的过程扰乱了这些父权结构的不可变性,并暴露了乌托邦的反乌托邦起源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Utopus’ uterus: The colonisation of the body and the birth of patriarchal utopia in Thomas More’s Utopia
Following European exploration of the Atlantic, origin myths could now be projected onto a possible future and ‘undiscovered’ lands. Often the island proved the most suitable design for these projections to ensure the ‘perfection’ of the community and avoidance of corruptive external influences. These novel conceptualisations envisaged new social constructs to explain human nature, however, they continued to be overtly patriarchal. Gender essentialism and colonisation of the female body was an integral part of reproducing traditional utopian imaginings. Thomas More’s Utopia exemplifies this archetypal gendered conceptualisation of the ideal island society where female education serves to reinforce patriarchal structures and women are essentialised in terms of their fertility. This paper addresses the relationship between the geography of Utopia and the insularity and confinement of women as dominated ‘matrixial entities’ which is further reinforced by utopian cartography. In this context, I assert that the process of colonisation and islanding unsettles the immutability of these patriarchal constructs and exposes the dystopian origins of Utopia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信