禁酒主义与宗教自由之间:死藤水教会与美国政府的法律纠纷

Q2 Social Sciences

Novos Estudos CEBRAP Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.25091/s01013300202100030009

Henrique Fernandes Antunes

{"title":"禁酒主义与宗教自由之间:死藤水教会与美国政府的法律纠纷","authors":"Henrique Fernandes Antunes","doi":"10.25091/s01013300202100030009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the legal disputes between the U.S. government and the Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal (UDV), as well as on the regulation of the religious use of ayahuasca by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Our aim is to present the main issues that were at stake throughout the dispute, especially the relationship between the limits of religious freedom when associated with the use of controlled substances.","PeriodicalId":35272,"journal":{"name":"Novos Estudos CEBRAP","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between Prohibitionism and Religious Freedom: The Legal Disputes Concerning an Ayahuasca Church and the United States Government\",\"authors\":\"Henrique Fernandes Antunes\",\"doi\":\"10.25091/s01013300202100030009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on the legal disputes between the U.S. government and the Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal (UDV), as well as on the regulation of the religious use of ayahuasca by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Our aim is to present the main issues that were at stake throughout the dispute, especially the relationship between the limits of religious freedom when associated with the use of controlled substances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Novos Estudos CEBRAP\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Novos Estudos CEBRAP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25091/s01013300202100030009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novos Estudos CEBRAP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25091/s01013300202100030009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要关注美国政府与Espírita有益联合中心(UDV)之间的法律纠纷，以及美国缉毒局(DEA)对死藤水宗教用途的监管。我们的目的是提出在整个争端中利害攸关的主要问题，特别是与使用受管制物质有关的宗教自由限制之间的关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Between Prohibitionism and Religious Freedom: The Legal Disputes Concerning an Ayahuasca Church and the United States Government

This article focuses on the legal disputes between the U.S. government and the Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal (UDV), as well as on the regulation of the religious use of ayahuasca by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Our aim is to present the main issues that were at stake throughout the dispute, especially the relationship between the limits of religious freedom when associated with the use of controlled substances.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Novos Estudos CEBRAP Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： Novos Estudos Cebrap to publish original contributions in Sociology, Politics, Anthropology and Humanities. The goal of the journal is to publish relevant studies and to present contributions to the intellectual debate in a wide variety of subjects, from art criticism to the implementation of economic and social polices. Its abbreviated title is Novos estud. - CEBRAP, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.