重症监护病房专业人员对治疗努力限制的意见

A. González-Castro, O. Azcune, Y. Peñasco, J.C. Rodríguez, M.J. Domínguez, R. Rojas
{"title":"重症监护病房专业人员对治疗努力限制的意见","authors":"A. González-Castro,&nbsp;O. Azcune,&nbsp;Y. Peñasco,&nbsp;J.C. Rodríguez,&nbsp;M.J. Domínguez,&nbsp;R. Rojas","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2015.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the opinion held by professionals in an intensive care unit on the limitation of therapeutic effort process at the end-of-life (LTE). To collect this information, and then use it to improve the basic aspects that the LTE have on the quality of care by intensive care unit staff.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A prospective descriptive study was carried out in the Intensive Care Unit of a third level public university hospital. A questionnaire was prepared that included questions on their demographic profile and others to provide an ethical valuation profile, as well as to find out the knowledge and information that the professional had on the LTE. Descriptive study of the sample and comparative statistics were performed using the chi-squared statistical test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 65 valid questionnaires were obtained from a convenience sample of 70 professionals. Almost all of them (98%) were in favour of the limitation of therapeutic effort. The LTE was considered as some kind of euthanasia (active or passive) in up to 28% of the replies, valuations by professional categories is shown in. More than three-quarters (77%) had the belief that not to start treatment was not the same as withdrawing an already established treatment. Just over half (52%) of the respondents believe the value that should have more weight when considering LET would be the prognosis of the current illness of the patient, and 46% the future quality of life of the patient. The economic cost of treatment to be applied was not considered in any case.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The LTE is approved by the majority of professionals in our Intensive Care Unit. Although a non-negligible percentage understood it as a form of euthanasia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"31 5","pages":"Pages 262-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2015.12.007","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opinión de los profesionales de una unidad de cuidados intensivos sobre la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico\",\"authors\":\"A. González-Castro,&nbsp;O. Azcune,&nbsp;Y. Peñasco,&nbsp;J.C. Rodríguez,&nbsp;M.J. Domínguez,&nbsp;R. Rojas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cali.2015.12.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the opinion held by professionals in an intensive care unit on the limitation of therapeutic effort process at the end-of-life (LTE). To collect this information, and then use it to improve the basic aspects that the LTE have on the quality of care by intensive care unit staff.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A prospective descriptive study was carried out in the Intensive Care Unit of a third level public university hospital. A questionnaire was prepared that included questions on their demographic profile and others to provide an ethical valuation profile, as well as to find out the knowledge and information that the professional had on the LTE. Descriptive study of the sample and comparative statistics were performed using the chi-squared statistical test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 65 valid questionnaires were obtained from a convenience sample of 70 professionals. Almost all of them (98%) were in favour of the limitation of therapeutic effort. The LTE was considered as some kind of euthanasia (active or passive) in up to 28% of the replies, valuations by professional categories is shown in. More than three-quarters (77%) had the belief that not to start treatment was not the same as withdrawing an already established treatment. Just over half (52%) of the respondents believe the value that should have more weight when considering LET would be the prognosis of the current illness of the patient, and 46% the future quality of life of the patient. The economic cost of treatment to be applied was not considered in any case.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The LTE is approved by the majority of professionals in our Intensive Care Unit. Although a non-negligible percentage understood it as a form of euthanasia.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 262-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2015.12.007\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X16000300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X16000300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的了解重症监护病房专业人员对生命末期治疗努力过程局限性的看法。收集这些信息,然后利用它来改善LTE对重症监护病房工作人员护理质量的基本方面。材料与方法在某三级公立大学附属医院重症监护病房进行前瞻性描述性研究。准备了一份调查问卷,其中包括关于他们的人口统计资料和其他问题,以提供道德评估资料,并找出专业人员对LTE的知识和信息。采用卡方统计检验对样本进行描述性研究和比较统计。结果方便抽样70名专业人员,共回收有效问卷65份。几乎所有人(98%)都赞成限制治疗努力。在多达28%的回复中,LTE被认为是某种安乐死(主动或被动),专业类别的估值显示在。超过四分之三(77%)的人认为,不开始治疗与退出已经确定的治疗不同。超过一半(52%)的受访者认为,在考虑LET时,应该更重视的价值是患者当前疾病的预后,46%的受访者认为应该重视患者未来的生活质量。在任何情况下,都没有考虑到将要实施的治疗的经济费用。我们重症监护室的大多数专业人员都认可LTE。尽管有不可忽略的百分比将其理解为安乐死的一种形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opinión de los profesionales de una unidad de cuidados intensivos sobre la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico

Objective

To determine the opinion held by professionals in an intensive care unit on the limitation of therapeutic effort process at the end-of-life (LTE). To collect this information, and then use it to improve the basic aspects that the LTE have on the quality of care by intensive care unit staff.

Material and methods

A prospective descriptive study was carried out in the Intensive Care Unit of a third level public university hospital. A questionnaire was prepared that included questions on their demographic profile and others to provide an ethical valuation profile, as well as to find out the knowledge and information that the professional had on the LTE. Descriptive study of the sample and comparative statistics were performed using the chi-squared statistical test.

Results

A total of 65 valid questionnaires were obtained from a convenience sample of 70 professionals. Almost all of them (98%) were in favour of the limitation of therapeutic effort. The LTE was considered as some kind of euthanasia (active or passive) in up to 28% of the replies, valuations by professional categories is shown in. More than three-quarters (77%) had the belief that not to start treatment was not the same as withdrawing an already established treatment. Just over half (52%) of the respondents believe the value that should have more weight when considering LET would be the prognosis of the current illness of the patient, and 46% the future quality of life of the patient. The economic cost of treatment to be applied was not considered in any case.

Conclusions

The LTE is approved by the majority of professionals in our Intensive Care Unit. Although a non-negligible percentage understood it as a form of euthanasia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信