三种评估脑震荡/轻度创伤性脑损伤的临床试验的评价

{"title":"三种评估脑震荡/轻度创伤性脑损伤的临床试验的评价","authors":"","doi":"10.31707/vdr2021.7.1.p43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A focus of both basic and clinical research on concussion/mild traumatic brain injury has been to ascertain which test, or combination of tests, is best for its detection. In the present retrospective analysis, three potential clinical tests were evaluated to determine which one, or combination, best differentiated between visually-symptomatic concussed (n=52) versus asymptomatic non-concussed (n=24) patients. The three tests were: distance horizontal vergence facility, peripheral visual motion, and critical flicker fusion. Each test was found to differentiate the two groups. The peripheral visual motion test was the best, with a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 83.3%. When this test was combined with the distance horizontal vergence facility test, specificity remained the same whereas sensitivity increased to 94.4%. Addition of the critical flicker fusion test did not affect these values. Thus, of the three, the combination of the peripheral visual motion and distance horizontal vergence facility tests has a high probability of assisting in concussion detection and diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":91423,"journal":{"name":"Vision development and rehabilitation","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Three Clinical Tests for Evaluation of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.31707/vdr2021.7.1.p43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A focus of both basic and clinical research on concussion/mild traumatic brain injury has been to ascertain which test, or combination of tests, is best for its detection. In the present retrospective analysis, three potential clinical tests were evaluated to determine which one, or combination, best differentiated between visually-symptomatic concussed (n=52) versus asymptomatic non-concussed (n=24) patients. The three tests were: distance horizontal vergence facility, peripheral visual motion, and critical flicker fusion. Each test was found to differentiate the two groups. The peripheral visual motion test was the best, with a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 83.3%. When this test was combined with the distance horizontal vergence facility test, specificity remained the same whereas sensitivity increased to 94.4%. Addition of the critical flicker fusion test did not affect these values. Thus, of the three, the combination of the peripheral visual motion and distance horizontal vergence facility tests has a high probability of assisting in concussion detection and diagnosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision development and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision development and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31707/vdr2021.7.1.p43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision development and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31707/vdr2021.7.1.p43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

脑震荡/轻度创伤性脑损伤的基础研究和临床研究的一个重点是确定哪种测试或哪种测试组合最适合检测。在本回顾性分析中,评估了三种潜在的临床试验,以确定哪一种或哪一种组合能最好地区分有视觉症状的脑震荡(n=52)和无症状的非脑震荡(n=24)患者。三项测试分别是:距离水平汇聚、周边视觉运动和临界闪烁融合。每个测试都能区分两组。外周视觉运动检查的灵敏度为93.8%,特异性为83.3%。结合距离水平辐合设施检测,特异度保持不变,敏感性提高至94.4%。增加临界闪烁融合试验对这些值没有影响。因此,在这三者中,结合周边视觉运动和距离水平辐合设施测试有很高的可能性有助于脑震荡的检测和诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Three Clinical Tests for Evaluation of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
A focus of both basic and clinical research on concussion/mild traumatic brain injury has been to ascertain which test, or combination of tests, is best for its detection. In the present retrospective analysis, three potential clinical tests were evaluated to determine which one, or combination, best differentiated between visually-symptomatic concussed (n=52) versus asymptomatic non-concussed (n=24) patients. The three tests were: distance horizontal vergence facility, peripheral visual motion, and critical flicker fusion. Each test was found to differentiate the two groups. The peripheral visual motion test was the best, with a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 83.3%. When this test was combined with the distance horizontal vergence facility test, specificity remained the same whereas sensitivity increased to 94.4%. Addition of the critical flicker fusion test did not affect these values. Thus, of the three, the combination of the peripheral visual motion and distance horizontal vergence facility tests has a high probability of assisting in concussion detection and diagnosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信