{"title":"儿童喉罩气道:回顾性审计","authors":"Tran Nobuyuki-Hai, N.Olomu Patrick, Bocanegra Ashley, Khan Asif, Cheyney John, Handy Alexandra, Szmuk Peter","doi":"10.24015/JAPM.2016.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme (LMAS) is a sophisticated, second-generation supraglottic airway device, with an improved seal, and gastric access. It is a capable device for use in more complex procedures and in younger children. No study has been able to analyze a large pediatric sample of patients to assess how the LMAS is being utilized. In this retrospective audit, we evaluated the use of the LMAS in routine clinical practice. In addition to this, utilization of LMAS performance test was evaluated.Methods: A retrospective audit was performed of a major tertiary children's hospital's electronic medical record database to identify all children in whom the LMAS was utilized for airway management over a two-year period. In addition to demographic data, we collected the following LMAS data: size of the LMAS, the number of insertion attempts, volume of air injected into the cuff, the cuff pressure, and the oropharyngeal leak pressure. We also recorded the performance of tests for proper position and function, the mode of lung ventilation, the use of muscle relaxants and use of any alternative airway devices.Results: The LMAS was used in 418 children accounting for only 4% of all LMA usage and only 0.6% of all usage for general anesthesia. The first-attempt placement success rate was 96.4% (382/396). Five of 418 (1.2%) insertions were reported as failures. Mechanical ventilation was used in only 26% of cases with a vast majority (74%) breathing spontaneously. Cuff pressure was measured in 74/418 (18%) of cases. Oropharyngeal leak pressures were measured in 90/418 (21.5%) cases. Maneuvers performed to verify correct placement and performance of the LMAS were rarely performed. Use of the LMAS for invasive procedures occurred in only 5 cases (1.2%).Conclusions: This study shows the LMAS to be highly successful in the hands of various cadres of anesthesia providers at a major tertiary hospital and performs reliably well. Our data reveals many areas of potential improvement for use of the LMAS in the pediatric population, as a device capable for usage in more invasive surgical procedures, younger patients, and mechanical ventilation. Citation: Nobuyuki-Hai Tran, Patrick N. Olomu, Ashley Bocanegra, Asif Khan, John Cheyney, Alexandra Handy, et al. Laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children: a retrospective audit. J Anesth Perioper Med 2016; 3: 241-6. doi: 10.24015/JAPM.2016.0033This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.","PeriodicalId":15018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","volume":"7 1","pages":"241-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme in Children: A Retrospective Audit\",\"authors\":\"Tran Nobuyuki-Hai, N.Olomu Patrick, Bocanegra Ashley, Khan Asif, Cheyney John, Handy Alexandra, Szmuk Peter\",\"doi\":\"10.24015/JAPM.2016.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme (LMAS) is a sophisticated, second-generation supraglottic airway device, with an improved seal, and gastric access. It is a capable device for use in more complex procedures and in younger children. No study has been able to analyze a large pediatric sample of patients to assess how the LMAS is being utilized. In this retrospective audit, we evaluated the use of the LMAS in routine clinical practice. In addition to this, utilization of LMAS performance test was evaluated.Methods: A retrospective audit was performed of a major tertiary children's hospital's electronic medical record database to identify all children in whom the LMAS was utilized for airway management over a two-year period. In addition to demographic data, we collected the following LMAS data: size of the LMAS, the number of insertion attempts, volume of air injected into the cuff, the cuff pressure, and the oropharyngeal leak pressure. We also recorded the performance of tests for proper position and function, the mode of lung ventilation, the use of muscle relaxants and use of any alternative airway devices.Results: The LMAS was used in 418 children accounting for only 4% of all LMA usage and only 0.6% of all usage for general anesthesia. The first-attempt placement success rate was 96.4% (382/396). Five of 418 (1.2%) insertions were reported as failures. Mechanical ventilation was used in only 26% of cases with a vast majority (74%) breathing spontaneously. Cuff pressure was measured in 74/418 (18%) of cases. Oropharyngeal leak pressures were measured in 90/418 (21.5%) cases. Maneuvers performed to verify correct placement and performance of the LMAS were rarely performed. Use of the LMAS for invasive procedures occurred in only 5 cases (1.2%).Conclusions: This study shows the LMAS to be highly successful in the hands of various cadres of anesthesia providers at a major tertiary hospital and performs reliably well. Our data reveals many areas of potential improvement for use of the LMAS in the pediatric population, as a device capable for usage in more invasive surgical procedures, younger patients, and mechanical ventilation. Citation: Nobuyuki-Hai Tran, Patrick N. Olomu, Ashley Bocanegra, Asif Khan, John Cheyney, Alexandra Handy, et al. Laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children: a retrospective audit. J Anesth Perioper Med 2016; 3: 241-6. doi: 10.24015/JAPM.2016.0033This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"241-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24015/JAPM.2016.0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24015/JAPM.2016.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:喉罩气道(LMA) Supreme (LMAS)是一种先进的第二代声门上气道装置,具有改进的密封性和胃通道。它是一种功能强大的设备,可用于更复杂的程序和年幼的儿童。没有一项研究能够分析大量儿科患者样本来评估LMAS是如何被利用的。在这次回顾性审计中,我们评估了LMAS在常规临床实践中的应用。此外,还对LMAS性能测试的利用率进行了评价。方法:对一家大型三级儿童医院的电子病历数据库进行回顾性审计,以确定在两年内使用LMAS进行气道管理的所有儿童。除了人口统计数据外,我们还收集了以下LMAS数据:LMAS的大小、插入次数、注入袖带的空气量、袖带压力和口咽漏压。我们还记录了适当的体位和功能、肺通气模式、肌肉松弛剂的使用和任何替代气道设备的使用测试的表现。结果:418名儿童使用LMA,仅占全部LMA使用的4%,仅占全麻使用的0.6%。首次尝试安置成功率为96.4%(382/396)。418例插入中有5例(1.2%)插入失败。机械通气仅在26%的病例中使用,绝大多数(74%)是自发呼吸。在74/418(18%)的病例中测量袖带压力。在90/418(21.5%)病例中测量口咽漏压。很少进行机动来验证LMAS的正确放置和性能。只有5例(1.2%)使用LMAS进行有创手术。结论:本研究表明LMAS在一家大型三级医院的麻醉服务人员的各种干部手中是非常成功的,并且表现可靠。我们的数据揭示了LMAS在儿科人群中使用的许多潜在改进领域,作为一种能够用于更具侵入性的外科手术、年轻患者和机械通气的设备。引用本文:Nobuyuki-Hai Tran, Patrick N. Olomu, Ashley Bocanegra, Asif Khan, John Cheyney, Alexandra Handy等。儿童喉罩气道:回顾性审计。中华外科杂志2016;3: 241 - 6。doi: 10.24015/ japm .2016.0033这是一篇开放获取的文章,由Evidence Based Communications (EBC)发表。本作品遵循知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议,允许以任何媒介或格式出于任何合法目的不受限制地使用、分发和复制。要查看此许可证的副本,请访问http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/。
Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme in Children: A Retrospective Audit
Background: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme (LMAS) is a sophisticated, second-generation supraglottic airway device, with an improved seal, and gastric access. It is a capable device for use in more complex procedures and in younger children. No study has been able to analyze a large pediatric sample of patients to assess how the LMAS is being utilized. In this retrospective audit, we evaluated the use of the LMAS in routine clinical practice. In addition to this, utilization of LMAS performance test was evaluated.Methods: A retrospective audit was performed of a major tertiary children's hospital's electronic medical record database to identify all children in whom the LMAS was utilized for airway management over a two-year period. In addition to demographic data, we collected the following LMAS data: size of the LMAS, the number of insertion attempts, volume of air injected into the cuff, the cuff pressure, and the oropharyngeal leak pressure. We also recorded the performance of tests for proper position and function, the mode of lung ventilation, the use of muscle relaxants and use of any alternative airway devices.Results: The LMAS was used in 418 children accounting for only 4% of all LMA usage and only 0.6% of all usage for general anesthesia. The first-attempt placement success rate was 96.4% (382/396). Five of 418 (1.2%) insertions were reported as failures. Mechanical ventilation was used in only 26% of cases with a vast majority (74%) breathing spontaneously. Cuff pressure was measured in 74/418 (18%) of cases. Oropharyngeal leak pressures were measured in 90/418 (21.5%) cases. Maneuvers performed to verify correct placement and performance of the LMAS were rarely performed. Use of the LMAS for invasive procedures occurred in only 5 cases (1.2%).Conclusions: This study shows the LMAS to be highly successful in the hands of various cadres of anesthesia providers at a major tertiary hospital and performs reliably well. Our data reveals many areas of potential improvement for use of the LMAS in the pediatric population, as a device capable for usage in more invasive surgical procedures, younger patients, and mechanical ventilation. Citation: Nobuyuki-Hai Tran, Patrick N. Olomu, Ashley Bocanegra, Asif Khan, John Cheyney, Alexandra Handy, et al. Laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children: a retrospective audit. J Anesth Perioper Med 2016; 3: 241-6. doi: 10.24015/JAPM.2016.0033This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.