{"title":"EPISTEMOLOGI TAFSĪR QUR`ᾹN KARĪM KARYA MAHMUD YUNUS","authors":"Matsna Afwi Nadia","doi":"10.20871/tjsq.v5i2.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explains the thoughts of Mahmud Yunus in studying the epistemology of Tafsīr Qur`ān Karīm which is in Indonesian, complete in 30 chapters, to test its truth or to what extent the interpretation can be justified. According to the author, what is interesting to discuss: first, what are the sources used as references Mahmud Yunus in Tafsīr Qur`ān Karīm, secondly, what is the method of Mahmud Yunus in writing his book and thirdly, what is the validity of Mahmud Yunus's interpretation in Tafsīr Qur`ān Karīm. In order to achieve this purpose, this study uses analysis-based library research methods. The results of this study show: that the sources of interpretation referred to by Mahmud Yunus in Tafsīr Qur`ān Karīm include an-naql and al-aql sources, namely the Qur’an, hadith, qaul companions, qaul tabiin, holy books and opinions of scholars, reasoning, Arabic, scientific discoveries or scientific theories, and reality. However, the use of the al-'aql source is more dominant in its interpretation so that it is classified into the interpretation of bi al-ra'yi. Regarding the validity of his interpretation, Mahmud Yunus adheres to the correspondence theory of truth in which his interpretation of the kauniyah verses can be said to be in accordance with reality and scientific facts. Besides that, he also adheres to a pragmatic theory in which he tries so that the product of his interpretation can be an alternative solution for solving socio-religious problems faced by society.","PeriodicalId":53103,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Studi AlQuran","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Studi AlQuran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20871/tjsq.v5i2.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文阐述了尤努斯在印尼语《塔夫斯·r·古兰经ān kar m》认识论研究中的思想,共30章,以检验其真理性或解释在多大程度上是合理的。作者认为,值得讨论的是:第一,Mahmud Yunus在《塔夫斯īr Qur ' ān kar m》中作为参考的资料来源是什么,第二,Mahmud Yunus写这本书的方法是什么,第三,Mahmud Yunus在《塔夫斯īr Qur ' ān kar m》中的解释的有效性是什么。为了达到这一目的,本研究采用了基于分析的图书馆研究方法。本研究结果表明:尤努斯在《tafsurr Qur ' ān kar m》中提到的解释来源包括an-naql和al-aql来源,即古兰经、圣训、qaul同伴、qaul tabiin、圣书和学者的观点、推理、阿拉伯语、科学发现或科学理论、现实。然而,al-'aql来源的使用在其解释中占主导地位,因此它被归类为bi al-ra'yi的解释。关于其解释的有效性,尤努斯坚持真理的对应理论,他对考尼耶经文的解释可以说是符合现实和科学事实的。除此之外,他还坚持一种实用主义理论,在这种理论中,他试图使他的解释的产物能够成为解决社会面临的社会宗教问题的另一种解决方案。
EPISTEMOLOGI TAFSĪR QUR`ᾹN KARĪM KARYA MAHMUD YUNUS
This article explains the thoughts of Mahmud Yunus in studying the epistemology of Tafsīr Qur`ān Karīm which is in Indonesian, complete in 30 chapters, to test its truth or to what extent the interpretation can be justified. According to the author, what is interesting to discuss: first, what are the sources used as references Mahmud Yunus in Tafsīr Qur`ān Karīm, secondly, what is the method of Mahmud Yunus in writing his book and thirdly, what is the validity of Mahmud Yunus's interpretation in Tafsīr Qur`ān Karīm. In order to achieve this purpose, this study uses analysis-based library research methods. The results of this study show: that the sources of interpretation referred to by Mahmud Yunus in Tafsīr Qur`ān Karīm include an-naql and al-aql sources, namely the Qur’an, hadith, qaul companions, qaul tabiin, holy books and opinions of scholars, reasoning, Arabic, scientific discoveries or scientific theories, and reality. However, the use of the al-'aql source is more dominant in its interpretation so that it is classified into the interpretation of bi al-ra'yi. Regarding the validity of his interpretation, Mahmud Yunus adheres to the correspondence theory of truth in which his interpretation of the kauniyah verses can be said to be in accordance with reality and scientific facts. Besides that, he also adheres to a pragmatic theory in which he tries so that the product of his interpretation can be an alternative solution for solving socio-religious problems faced by society.