整合基于地理信息系统的方法和SWAT模型,以确定卢旺达潜在的合适雨水收集地点

Adeline Umugwaneza, X. Chen, Tie Liu, Richard Mind’je, Aline Uwineza, P. M. Kayumba, Solange Uwamahoro, Jeanine Umuhoza, Aboubakar Gasirabo, Albert Poponi Maniraho
{"title":"整合基于地理信息系统的方法和SWAT模型,以确定卢旺达潜在的合适雨水收集地点","authors":"Adeline Umugwaneza, X. Chen, Tie Liu, Richard Mind’je, Aline Uwineza, P. M. Kayumba, Solange Uwamahoro, Jeanine Umuhoza, Aboubakar Gasirabo, Albert Poponi Maniraho","doi":"10.2166/aqua.2022.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The increasing demand of water results in the overexploitation of water resources. This situation calls for more effective water management alternatives including rainwater harvesting (RWH) systems. Due to the lack of biophysical data and infrastructure, the identification of suitable sites for various RWH systems is a challenging issue. However, integrating geospatial analysis and modeling approaches has become a promising tool to identify suitable sites for RWH. Thus, this study aimed at identifying suitable sites for RWH in the Nyabugogo catchment located in Rwanda by integrating a geo-information-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model. Moreover, the sediment yield was compared to the soil erosion evaluated using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) owing to the lack of sediment concentration measured data. The results revealed that about 4.8 and 16.35% of the study area are classified as highly suitable and suitable areas for RWH, respectively. Around 6% of the study area (98.5 km2) was found to be suitable for farm ponds, whereas 1.6% (26.1 km2) suitable for check dams, and 25.9% (423 km2) suitable for bench terraces. Among 50 proposed sites for the RWH structures, 29 are located in the most suitable area for RWH. The results implicated that the surface runoff, sediment yield, and topography are essential factors in identifying the suitability of RWH areas. It is concluded that the integrated geospatial and MCDM techniques provide a useful and efficient method for planning RWH at a basin scale in the study area.","PeriodicalId":17666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating a GIS-based approach and a SWAT model to identify potential suitable sites for rainwater harvesting in Rwanda\",\"authors\":\"Adeline Umugwaneza, X. Chen, Tie Liu, Richard Mind’je, Aline Uwineza, P. M. Kayumba, Solange Uwamahoro, Jeanine Umuhoza, Aboubakar Gasirabo, Albert Poponi Maniraho\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/aqua.2022.111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The increasing demand of water results in the overexploitation of water resources. This situation calls for more effective water management alternatives including rainwater harvesting (RWH) systems. Due to the lack of biophysical data and infrastructure, the identification of suitable sites for various RWH systems is a challenging issue. However, integrating geospatial analysis and modeling approaches has become a promising tool to identify suitable sites for RWH. Thus, this study aimed at identifying suitable sites for RWH in the Nyabugogo catchment located in Rwanda by integrating a geo-information-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model. Moreover, the sediment yield was compared to the soil erosion evaluated using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) owing to the lack of sediment concentration measured data. The results revealed that about 4.8 and 16.35% of the study area are classified as highly suitable and suitable areas for RWH, respectively. Around 6% of the study area (98.5 km2) was found to be suitable for farm ponds, whereas 1.6% (26.1 km2) suitable for check dams, and 25.9% (423 km2) suitable for bench terraces. Among 50 proposed sites for the RWH structures, 29 are located in the most suitable area for RWH. The results implicated that the surface runoff, sediment yield, and topography are essential factors in identifying the suitability of RWH areas. It is concluded that the integrated geospatial and MCDM techniques provide a useful and efficient method for planning RWH at a basin scale in the study area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2022.111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2022.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

水资源需求的增加导致了水资源的过度开发。这种情况需要更有效的水管理替代方案,包括雨水收集系统。由于缺乏生物物理数据和基础设施,确定各种RWH系统的合适地点是一个具有挑战性的问题。然而,整合地理空间分析和建模方法已成为确定RWH合适地点的一种很有前途的工具。因此,本研究旨在通过整合基于地理信息的多标准决策(MCDM)和SWAT(水土评估工具)模型,在卢旺达的Nyabugogo流域确定RWH的合适地点。此外,由于缺乏泥沙浓度测量数据,将产沙量与使用修正通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)评估的土壤侵蚀进行了比较。结果表明,研究区高度适宜区和适宜区比例分别为4.8%和16.35%。约6%的研究面积(98.5 km2)适合农场池塘,1.6% (26.1 km2)适合拦河坝,25.9% (423 km2)适合梯田。在50个建议的RWH建筑地点中,有29个位于最适合RWH的地区。结果表明,地表径流、产沙量和地形是确定水源地适宜性的重要因素。综上所述,地理空间与MCDM相结合的方法为研究区流域尺度的水势规划提供了一种有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating a GIS-based approach and a SWAT model to identify potential suitable sites for rainwater harvesting in Rwanda
The increasing demand of water results in the overexploitation of water resources. This situation calls for more effective water management alternatives including rainwater harvesting (RWH) systems. Due to the lack of biophysical data and infrastructure, the identification of suitable sites for various RWH systems is a challenging issue. However, integrating geospatial analysis and modeling approaches has become a promising tool to identify suitable sites for RWH. Thus, this study aimed at identifying suitable sites for RWH in the Nyabugogo catchment located in Rwanda by integrating a geo-information-based multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model. Moreover, the sediment yield was compared to the soil erosion evaluated using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) owing to the lack of sediment concentration measured data. The results revealed that about 4.8 and 16.35% of the study area are classified as highly suitable and suitable areas for RWH, respectively. Around 6% of the study area (98.5 km2) was found to be suitable for farm ponds, whereas 1.6% (26.1 km2) suitable for check dams, and 25.9% (423 km2) suitable for bench terraces. Among 50 proposed sites for the RWH structures, 29 are located in the most suitable area for RWH. The results implicated that the surface runoff, sediment yield, and topography are essential factors in identifying the suitability of RWH areas. It is concluded that the integrated geospatial and MCDM techniques provide a useful and efficient method for planning RWH at a basin scale in the study area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信