AI- tam:一个研究人在环人工智能应用中用户接受度和协作意图的模型

I. Baroni, Gloria Re Calegari, Damiano Scandolari, I. Celino
{"title":"AI- tam:一个研究人在环人工智能应用中用户接受度和协作意图的模型","authors":"I. Baroni, Gloria Re Calegari, Damiano Scandolari, I. Celino","doi":"10.15346/hc.v9i1.134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More and more frequently, digital applications make use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities to provide advanced features; on the other hand, human-in-the-loop approaches are on the rise to involve people in AI-powered pipelines for data collection, results validation and decision-making.Does the introduction of AI features affect user acceptance? Does the AI result quality affect people willingness to use such applications? Does the additional user effort required in human-in-the-loop mechanisms change the application adoption and use?This study aims to provide a reference approach to answer those questions. We propose a model that extends the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with further constructs explicitly related to AI (user trust in AI and perceived quality of AI output, from XAI literature) and collaborative intention (willingness to contribute to AI pipelines).We tested the proposed model with an application for car damage claim reporting with AI-powered damage estimation for insurance customers. The results showed that the XAI related factors have a strong and positive effect on the behavioural intention, the perceived usefulness and the ease of use of the application. Moreover, there is a strong link between the behavioural intention and the collaborative intention, indicating that indeed human-in-the-loop approaches can be successfullyadopted in final user applications.","PeriodicalId":92785,"journal":{"name":"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-TAM: a model to investigate user acceptance and collaborative intention inhuman-in-the-loop AI applications\",\"authors\":\"I. Baroni, Gloria Re Calegari, Damiano Scandolari, I. Celino\",\"doi\":\"10.15346/hc.v9i1.134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"More and more frequently, digital applications make use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities to provide advanced features; on the other hand, human-in-the-loop approaches are on the rise to involve people in AI-powered pipelines for data collection, results validation and decision-making.Does the introduction of AI features affect user acceptance? Does the AI result quality affect people willingness to use such applications? Does the additional user effort required in human-in-the-loop mechanisms change the application adoption and use?This study aims to provide a reference approach to answer those questions. We propose a model that extends the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with further constructs explicitly related to AI (user trust in AI and perceived quality of AI output, from XAI literature) and collaborative intention (willingness to contribute to AI pipelines).We tested the proposed model with an application for car damage claim reporting with AI-powered damage estimation for insurance customers. The results showed that the XAI related factors have a strong and positive effect on the behavioural intention, the perceived usefulness and the ease of use of the application. Moreover, there is a strong link between the behavioural intention and the collaborative intention, indicating that indeed human-in-the-loop approaches can be successfullyadopted in final user applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v9i1.134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v9i1.134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字应用越来越频繁地利用人工智能(AI)功能来提供高级功能;另一方面,在人工智能驱动的数据收集、结果验证和决策过程中,人在循环的方法正在兴起。引入AI功能是否会影响用户接受度?人工智能的结果质量是否会影响人们使用这些应用程序的意愿?人在循环机制中所需的额外用户工作是否会改变应用程序的采用和使用?本研究旨在为回答这些问题提供一种参考方法。我们提出了一个模型,该模型扩展了技术接受模型(TAM),并进一步构建了与人工智能(用户对人工智能的信任和人工智能输出的感知质量,来自XAI文献)和协作意图(为人工智能管道做出贡献的意愿)明确相关的模型。我们用一个应用程序测试了提议的模型,该应用程序用于汽车损害索赔报告,并为保险客户提供人工智能驱动的损害估计。结果表明,虚拟智能相关因素对应用程序的行为意向、感知有用性和易用性有较强的正向影响。此外,行为意图和协作意图之间有很强的联系,这表明在最终用户应用中确实可以成功地采用人在环的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI-TAM: a model to investigate user acceptance and collaborative intention inhuman-in-the-loop AI applications
More and more frequently, digital applications make use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities to provide advanced features; on the other hand, human-in-the-loop approaches are on the rise to involve people in AI-powered pipelines for data collection, results validation and decision-making.Does the introduction of AI features affect user acceptance? Does the AI result quality affect people willingness to use such applications? Does the additional user effort required in human-in-the-loop mechanisms change the application adoption and use?This study aims to provide a reference approach to answer those questions. We propose a model that extends the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with further constructs explicitly related to AI (user trust in AI and perceived quality of AI output, from XAI literature) and collaborative intention (willingness to contribute to AI pipelines).We tested the proposed model with an application for car damage claim reporting with AI-powered damage estimation for insurance customers. The results showed that the XAI related factors have a strong and positive effect on the behavioural intention, the perceived usefulness and the ease of use of the application. Moreover, there is a strong link between the behavioural intention and the collaborative intention, indicating that indeed human-in-the-loop approaches can be successfullyadopted in final user applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信