{"title":"非建设:一个后退建设的乌托邦","authors":"Miguel Guitart","doi":"10.1080/13602365.2023.2242876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spanning the past two centuries, the world has seen voracious urban expansion premised on exponential population growth and radical transformations in the productive means and methods used to generate goods. This has resulted in built environments designed for social performance and economic production becoming indifferent (if not antagonistic) to the sustenance of pre-existing ecological relationships. In a world that is progressively broken by long-term and sustained environmental abuse, architects need to reconsider how architecture is produced in relation to regional biotic networks. Architectural production may need to be re-approached through non-additive strategies. It is time for architecture to assimilate subtractive strategies, that is un-building part of what has been built to rebalance the relationship between the ecological conditions and the constructed environment. This paper suggests two operating reformulations that could be considered utopian or lead to actual strategies of renaturalisation: succession, where structures would be reoccupied by natural ecosystems, and withdrawal, where structures would be progressively disassembled and removed to reinstate a natural landscape. The discussion on the two strategies will focus on the elimination of what is constructed, the assimilation of subtractive strategies, and the un-building of parts of what have been built to rebalance the relationship between the ecological conditions and the constructed environments.","PeriodicalId":44236,"journal":{"name":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Un-building: a utopia of receding construction\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Guitart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13602365.2023.2242876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spanning the past two centuries, the world has seen voracious urban expansion premised on exponential population growth and radical transformations in the productive means and methods used to generate goods. This has resulted in built environments designed for social performance and economic production becoming indifferent (if not antagonistic) to the sustenance of pre-existing ecological relationships. In a world that is progressively broken by long-term and sustained environmental abuse, architects need to reconsider how architecture is produced in relation to regional biotic networks. Architectural production may need to be re-approached through non-additive strategies. It is time for architecture to assimilate subtractive strategies, that is un-building part of what has been built to rebalance the relationship between the ecological conditions and the constructed environment. This paper suggests two operating reformulations that could be considered utopian or lead to actual strategies of renaturalisation: succession, where structures would be reoccupied by natural ecosystems, and withdrawal, where structures would be progressively disassembled and removed to reinstate a natural landscape. The discussion on the two strategies will focus on the elimination of what is constructed, the assimilation of subtractive strategies, and the un-building of parts of what have been built to rebalance the relationship between the ecological conditions and the constructed environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2023.2242876\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2023.2242876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spanning the past two centuries, the world has seen voracious urban expansion premised on exponential population growth and radical transformations in the productive means and methods used to generate goods. This has resulted in built environments designed for social performance and economic production becoming indifferent (if not antagonistic) to the sustenance of pre-existing ecological relationships. In a world that is progressively broken by long-term and sustained environmental abuse, architects need to reconsider how architecture is produced in relation to regional biotic networks. Architectural production may need to be re-approached through non-additive strategies. It is time for architecture to assimilate subtractive strategies, that is un-building part of what has been built to rebalance the relationship between the ecological conditions and the constructed environment. This paper suggests two operating reformulations that could be considered utopian or lead to actual strategies of renaturalisation: succession, where structures would be reoccupied by natural ecosystems, and withdrawal, where structures would be progressively disassembled and removed to reinstate a natural landscape. The discussion on the two strategies will focus on the elimination of what is constructed, the assimilation of subtractive strategies, and the un-building of parts of what have been built to rebalance the relationship between the ecological conditions and the constructed environments.
期刊介绍:
METU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE is a biannual refereed publication of the Middle East Technical University published every June and December, and offers a comprehensive range of articles contributing to the development of knowledge in man-environment relations, design and planning. METU JFA accepts submissions in English or Turkish, and assumes that the manuscripts received by the Journal have not been published previously or that are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Editorial Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. METU JFA invites theory, research and history papers on the following fields and related interdisciplinary topics: architecture and urbanism, planning and design, restoration and preservation, buildings and building systems technologies and design, product design and technologies. Prospective manuscripts for publication in these fields may constitute; 1. Original theoretical papers; 2. Original research papers; 3. Documents and critical expositions; 4. Applied studies related to professional practice; 5. Educational works, commentaries and reviews; 6. Book reviews Manuscripts, in English or Turkish, have to be approved by the Editorial Board, which are then forwarded to Referees before acceptance for publication. The Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. It is assumed that the manuscripts received by the Journal are not sent to other journals for publication purposes and have not been previously published elsewhere.