异常毒性试验的最新方法

N. P. Neugodova, E. O. Stepanyuk, G. A. Sapozhnikova, E. I. Sakanyan, M. S. Ryabtseva
{"title":"异常毒性试验的最新方法","authors":"N. P. Neugodova, E. O. Stepanyuk, G. A. Sapozhnikova, E. I. Sakanyan, M. S. Ryabtseva","doi":"10.30895/1991-2919-2020-10-2-82-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For over 60 years, the Abnormal Toxicity Test (ATT) has been used as an important tool in safety control of some parenteral and veterinary products made from biological materials. In 2017, some of the members of the Pharmacopoeial Committee of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) proposed not to include the ATT in the draft monographs of the EAEU Pharmacopoeia based on the decision of the European Pharmacopoeia Commission to suppress the test. However, this may not be achieved in Russia at this point, because some production sites that manufacture medicinal products for human and veterinary use have not fully implemented GMP principles yet. The main aim of the ATT is to detect any toxicity above the pre-determined acceptable level. The unacceptable toxicity levels can manifest themselves in higher mortality rates or unexpected intoxication effects in laboratory animals. This test makes it possible to detect abnormal (high) toxicity of a medicinal product which may be associated with degradation products or undesirable impurities resulting from changes of the production technology, which are not mentioned in specification documents related to production, transportation, and storage. In 2016—2017 12 batches of veterinary products, including vaccines and sera, were found to be noncompliant, and the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare rejected 16 batches of medicinal products in 2016—2019. The aim of the study was to analyse current approaches to the ATT in the Russian and foreign pharmacopeias, and to develop a programme for phasing out the ATT use depending on the nature and pharmacological properties of medicinal products. Comparative analysis of the monographs of the world leading pharmacopeias showed that the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation has the most stringent test conditions. As an alternative to suppressing the ATT the authors suggest a phased approach to reduce the use of this test. They determined groups of medicinal products whose pharmacological properties allow for the suppression of the test. The proposed approach to phasing out the use of ATT will make it possible to use the test effectively and reduce the number of performed tests, but will still ensure drug safety. The suppression of the ATT can not be achieved without a comprehensive detailed research by quality control specialists and further discussion by all interested parties.","PeriodicalId":22286,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Approaches to the Abnormal Toxicity Test\",\"authors\":\"N. P. Neugodova, E. O. Stepanyuk, G. A. Sapozhnikova, E. I. Sakanyan, M. S. Ryabtseva\",\"doi\":\"10.30895/1991-2919-2020-10-2-82-88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For over 60 years, the Abnormal Toxicity Test (ATT) has been used as an important tool in safety control of some parenteral and veterinary products made from biological materials. In 2017, some of the members of the Pharmacopoeial Committee of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) proposed not to include the ATT in the draft monographs of the EAEU Pharmacopoeia based on the decision of the European Pharmacopoeia Commission to suppress the test. However, this may not be achieved in Russia at this point, because some production sites that manufacture medicinal products for human and veterinary use have not fully implemented GMP principles yet. The main aim of the ATT is to detect any toxicity above the pre-determined acceptable level. The unacceptable toxicity levels can manifest themselves in higher mortality rates or unexpected intoxication effects in laboratory animals. This test makes it possible to detect abnormal (high) toxicity of a medicinal product which may be associated with degradation products or undesirable impurities resulting from changes of the production technology, which are not mentioned in specification documents related to production, transportation, and storage. In 2016—2017 12 batches of veterinary products, including vaccines and sera, were found to be noncompliant, and the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare rejected 16 batches of medicinal products in 2016—2019. The aim of the study was to analyse current approaches to the ATT in the Russian and foreign pharmacopeias, and to develop a programme for phasing out the ATT use depending on the nature and pharmacological properties of medicinal products. Comparative analysis of the monographs of the world leading pharmacopeias showed that the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation has the most stringent test conditions. As an alternative to suppressing the ATT the authors suggest a phased approach to reduce the use of this test. They determined groups of medicinal products whose pharmacological properties allow for the suppression of the test. The proposed approach to phasing out the use of ATT will make it possible to use the test effectively and reduce the number of performed tests, but will still ensure drug safety. The suppression of the ATT can not be achieved without a comprehensive detailed research by quality control specialists and further discussion by all interested parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2020-10-2-82-88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2020-10-2-82-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

60多年来,异常毒性试验(ATT)一直被用作一些生物材料制成的非肠道和兽用产品的安全控制的重要工具。2017年,欧亚经济联盟(EAEU)药典委员会部分成员根据欧洲药典委员会压制该试验的决定,提出不将ATT纳入欧亚经济联盟药典各论草案。然而,目前在俄罗斯可能无法实现这一点,因为一些生产人用和兽用药品的生产基地尚未完全实施GMP原则。《武器贸易协定》的主要目的是检测任何超过预先确定的可接受水平的毒性。在实验动物中,不可接受的毒性水平可能表现为更高的死亡率或意想不到的中毒效应。该检测可以检测出药品的异常(高)毒性,这些毒性可能与降解产物或生产技术变化引起的不良杂质有关,而这些在与生产、运输和储存相关的规范文件中未提及。2016-2017年,包括疫苗和血清在内的12批次兽药被发现不合格,2016-2019年,联邦医疗保健监督局拒绝了16批次药品。这项研究的目的是分析俄罗斯和外国药典中目前使用《麻醉品管制法》的方法,并根据药品的性质和药理学特性制定一个逐步停止使用《麻醉品管制法》的方案。对世界主要药典各专论的比较分析表明,俄罗斯联邦国家药典具有最严格的检验条件。作为抑制ATT的替代方案,作者建议采取分阶段的方法来减少这种测试的使用。他们确定了药理学性质允许抑制测试的药品组。拟议的逐步停止使用ATT的办法将有可能有效地使用该检测并减少进行的检测次数,但仍将确保药物安全。如果没有质量控制专家的全面详细研究和所有有关各方的进一步讨论,就不可能实现禁止《武器贸易条约》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current Approaches to the Abnormal Toxicity Test
For over 60 years, the Abnormal Toxicity Test (ATT) has been used as an important tool in safety control of some parenteral and veterinary products made from biological materials. In 2017, some of the members of the Pharmacopoeial Committee of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) proposed not to include the ATT in the draft monographs of the EAEU Pharmacopoeia based on the decision of the European Pharmacopoeia Commission to suppress the test. However, this may not be achieved in Russia at this point, because some production sites that manufacture medicinal products for human and veterinary use have not fully implemented GMP principles yet. The main aim of the ATT is to detect any toxicity above the pre-determined acceptable level. The unacceptable toxicity levels can manifest themselves in higher mortality rates or unexpected intoxication effects in laboratory animals. This test makes it possible to detect abnormal (high) toxicity of a medicinal product which may be associated with degradation products or undesirable impurities resulting from changes of the production technology, which are not mentioned in specification documents related to production, transportation, and storage. In 2016—2017 12 batches of veterinary products, including vaccines and sera, were found to be noncompliant, and the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare rejected 16 batches of medicinal products in 2016—2019. The aim of the study was to analyse current approaches to the ATT in the Russian and foreign pharmacopeias, and to develop a programme for phasing out the ATT use depending on the nature and pharmacological properties of medicinal products. Comparative analysis of the monographs of the world leading pharmacopeias showed that the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation has the most stringent test conditions. As an alternative to suppressing the ATT the authors suggest a phased approach to reduce the use of this test. They determined groups of medicinal products whose pharmacological properties allow for the suppression of the test. The proposed approach to phasing out the use of ATT will make it possible to use the test effectively and reduce the number of performed tests, but will still ensure drug safety. The suppression of the ATT can not be achieved without a comprehensive detailed research by quality control specialists and further discussion by all interested parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信