不同抛光材料和上光工艺对烤瓷镍铬熔接表面粗糙度的影响

Lateef Essa Alwan Al-Jourani, Sabah Sahib Al-Habeeb, O. Abdullah
{"title":"不同抛光材料和上光工艺对烤瓷镍铬熔接表面粗糙度的影响","authors":"Lateef Essa Alwan Al-Jourani, Sabah Sahib Al-Habeeb, O. Abdullah","doi":"10.26477/IDJ.V37I1.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rough dental porcelain surface due to incorrect glazing technique or occlusal adjustment can cause wear of opposing teeth and tissue irritation. The aim of this study was to measure the surface roughness of low-fusing dental porcelain after treatment with different polishing materials and glazing techniques. Materials and Methods: Seventy metal-ceramic specimens were fabricated and divided into seven groups according to type of surface treatment. Group I: Unglazed porcelain (control group). Group II: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder and then autoglazed, Group III: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder and then applied glaze. Group IV: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder and then porcelain rubber wheels. Group V: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder, porcelain rubber wheel and then polishing paste. Group VI: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder, porcelain rubber wheels, polishing paste and then autoglazed Group VII: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder, porcelain rubber wheels, polishing paste and then applied glazed. The surface roughness averages “Ra” of the specimens have been determined using the profilometer. Results: One way – ANOVA showed highly significant differences among tested groups. Group I showed roughest group with highly significant differences among all tested groups. Followed by group II with highly significant differences, then group III which showed no significant differences with group VII, which is the smoothest group scored. Also group IV showed “Ra” values compared with group VI. While group V showed slightly significant differences with group VII (LSD test). Conclusion: Polished porcelain with (rubber wheel and polishing paste) can be considered a good alternative to applied glazed of porcelain restoration which is characterized by time consuming and sensitive technique. Moreover, autoglazing porcelain followed by polishing or without polishing , proved to be disadvantageous since it increases surface roughness","PeriodicalId":78326,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Dental Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface Roughness of Dental Porcelain Fused-To-Nickel Chromium Using Different Polishing Materials and Glazing Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Lateef Essa Alwan Al-Jourani, Sabah Sahib Al-Habeeb, O. Abdullah\",\"doi\":\"10.26477/IDJ.V37I1.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Rough dental porcelain surface due to incorrect glazing technique or occlusal adjustment can cause wear of opposing teeth and tissue irritation. The aim of this study was to measure the surface roughness of low-fusing dental porcelain after treatment with different polishing materials and glazing techniques. Materials and Methods: Seventy metal-ceramic specimens were fabricated and divided into seven groups according to type of surface treatment. Group I: Unglazed porcelain (control group). Group II: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder and then autoglazed, Group III: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder and then applied glaze. Group IV: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder and then porcelain rubber wheels. Group V: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder, porcelain rubber wheel and then polishing paste. Group VI: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder, porcelain rubber wheels, polishing paste and then autoglazed Group VII: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder, porcelain rubber wheels, polishing paste and then applied glazed. The surface roughness averages “Ra” of the specimens have been determined using the profilometer. Results: One way – ANOVA showed highly significant differences among tested groups. Group I showed roughest group with highly significant differences among all tested groups. Followed by group II with highly significant differences, then group III which showed no significant differences with group VII, which is the smoothest group scored. Also group IV showed “Ra” values compared with group VI. While group V showed slightly significant differences with group VII (LSD test). Conclusion: Polished porcelain with (rubber wheel and polishing paste) can be considered a good alternative to applied glazed of porcelain restoration which is characterized by time consuming and sensitive technique. Moreover, autoglazing porcelain followed by polishing or without polishing , proved to be disadvantageous since it increases surface roughness\",\"PeriodicalId\":78326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iraqi Dental Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iraqi Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26477/IDJ.V37I1.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26477/IDJ.V37I1.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于不正确的上釉技术或咬合调整导致牙釉质表面粗糙,会导致对牙磨损和组织刺激。本研究的目的是测量不同抛光材料和上釉工艺处理后低熔合牙瓷的表面粗糙度。材料与方法:制备了70个金属陶瓷试样,按表面处理方式分为7组。第一组:无釉瓷(对照组)。第二组:用喷砂粉抛光,然后自动上釉;第三组:用喷砂粉抛光,然后上釉。第四组:用喷砂粉抛光的瓷器,然后是瓷橡胶轮。V组:用喷砂粉、瓷胶轮、抛光膏进行抛光。第六组:用喷砂粉、瓷橡胶轮、抛光膏进行抛光,然后自动上光;第七组:用喷砂粉、瓷橡胶轮、抛光膏进行抛光,然后上釉。用轮廓仪测定了试样的表面粗糙度平均值“Ra”。结果:单因素方差分析显示各组间差异极显著。第一组为最粗组,各组间差异极显著。其次是组II,差异极显著,然后是组III,与组VII无显著差异,是得分最平稳的组。与VI组比较,IV组有“Ra”值,而V组与VII组有轻微差异(LSD检验)。结论:磨光瓷(橡胶轮+抛光膏)是一种较好的修复瓷釉的替代方法,磨光瓷修复瓷釉耗时长、工艺敏感。此外,自上光后再抛光或不抛光的陶瓷被证明是不利的,因为它增加了表面粗糙度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surface Roughness of Dental Porcelain Fused-To-Nickel Chromium Using Different Polishing Materials and Glazing Techniques
Background: Rough dental porcelain surface due to incorrect glazing technique or occlusal adjustment can cause wear of opposing teeth and tissue irritation. The aim of this study was to measure the surface roughness of low-fusing dental porcelain after treatment with different polishing materials and glazing techniques. Materials and Methods: Seventy metal-ceramic specimens were fabricated and divided into seven groups according to type of surface treatment. Group I: Unglazed porcelain (control group). Group II: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder and then autoglazed, Group III: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder and then applied glaze. Group IV: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder and then porcelain rubber wheels. Group V: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder, porcelain rubber wheel and then polishing paste. Group VI: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder, porcelain rubber wheels, polishing paste and then autoglazed Group VII: Porcelain polished with sandblast powder, porcelain rubber wheels, polishing paste and then applied glazed. The surface roughness averages “Ra” of the specimens have been determined using the profilometer. Results: One way – ANOVA showed highly significant differences among tested groups. Group I showed roughest group with highly significant differences among all tested groups. Followed by group II with highly significant differences, then group III which showed no significant differences with group VII, which is the smoothest group scored. Also group IV showed “Ra” values compared with group VI. While group V showed slightly significant differences with group VII (LSD test). Conclusion: Polished porcelain with (rubber wheel and polishing paste) can be considered a good alternative to applied glazed of porcelain restoration which is characterized by time consuming and sensitive technique. Moreover, autoglazing porcelain followed by polishing or without polishing , proved to be disadvantageous since it increases surface roughness
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信