经济学家对巴西人权问题的报道(1964年至2010年)

Camila Maria Risso Sales
{"title":"经济学家对巴西人权问题的报道(1964年至2010年)","authors":"Camila Maria Risso Sales","doi":"10.22481/sertanias.v3i1.12016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper focus on how The Economist dealt with the human rights affairs in Brazil between 1964 and 2010. Through content analysis texts addressing the topic directly or indirectly were visited and analised. The Economist position was also compared with The Times and The Guardian, as well as with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) dispatches. The ambition is to make a portrayal of the publication’s behaviour about human rights in Brazil, clarifying the evolution of its perspective about the theme. It is possible to suggest that political issues had had low priority, mainly during the so called “economic miracle”.","PeriodicalId":30528,"journal":{"name":"Semina Ciencias Sociais e Humanas","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economist coverage of human rights issues in Brazil (1964 to 2010)\",\"authors\":\"Camila Maria Risso Sales\",\"doi\":\"10.22481/sertanias.v3i1.12016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper focus on how The Economist dealt with the human rights affairs in Brazil between 1964 and 2010. Through content analysis texts addressing the topic directly or indirectly were visited and analised. The Economist position was also compared with The Times and The Guardian, as well as with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) dispatches. The ambition is to make a portrayal of the publication’s behaviour about human rights in Brazil, clarifying the evolution of its perspective about the theme. It is possible to suggest that political issues had had low priority, mainly during the so called “economic miracle”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Semina Ciencias Sociais e Humanas\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Semina Ciencias Sociais e Humanas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22481/sertanias.v3i1.12016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semina Ciencias Sociais e Humanas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22481/sertanias.v3i1.12016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文关注的是《经济学人》在1964年至2010年间如何处理巴西的人权事务。通过内容分析,对直接或间接涉及该主题的文本进行访问和分析。《经济学人》的立场还与《泰晤士报》和《卫报》以及外交和联邦事务部(FCO)的派遣进行了比较。其目标是描绘该出版物在巴西人权问题上的行为,澄清其对这一主题的看法的演变。我们可能会认为,政治问题的重要性并不高,主要是在所谓的“经济奇迹”期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The economist coverage of human rights issues in Brazil (1964 to 2010)
The paper focus on how The Economist dealt with the human rights affairs in Brazil between 1964 and 2010. Through content analysis texts addressing the topic directly or indirectly were visited and analised. The Economist position was also compared with The Times and The Guardian, as well as with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) dispatches. The ambition is to make a portrayal of the publication’s behaviour about human rights in Brazil, clarifying the evolution of its perspective about the theme. It is possible to suggest that political issues had had low priority, mainly during the so called “economic miracle”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信