现实必然性和自由选择

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Sam Alxatib
{"title":"现实必然性和自由选择","authors":"Sam Alxatib","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffz011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper concerns connections between Actuality Entailments (AEs), negation, and Free Choice inferences (FC). The main empirical foci of the paper are (i) that negated AElicensers entail the negation of the AE, and (ii) that AE-licensers do not give rise to FC inferences when they embed disjunctions. I derive challenges from the first finding to theories of AEs, and offer in conclusion a stipulative revision of Homer’s (2011) aspect-shift account of them. I then derive challenges from the second finding to theories of FC. I note first the consequences of the finding to implicature-theories of FC, where the first finding plays a crucial role, and discuss the assumptions needed to explain the AE/FC interaction. I also discuss how the interaction challenges theories of FC that derive the inference from the composition of modals with disjunctive prejacents.","PeriodicalId":15055,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Semantics","volume":"76 1","pages":"701-720"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actuality Entailments and Free Choice\",\"authors\":\"Sam Alxatib\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jos/ffz011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper concerns connections between Actuality Entailments (AEs), negation, and Free Choice inferences (FC). The main empirical foci of the paper are (i) that negated AElicensers entail the negation of the AE, and (ii) that AE-licensers do not give rise to FC inferences when they embed disjunctions. I derive challenges from the first finding to theories of AEs, and offer in conclusion a stipulative revision of Homer’s (2011) aspect-shift account of them. I then derive challenges from the second finding to theories of FC. I note first the consequences of the finding to implicature-theories of FC, where the first finding plays a crucial role, and discuss the assumptions needed to explain the AE/FC interaction. I also discuss how the interaction challenges theories of FC that derive the inference from the composition of modals with disjunctive prejacents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Semantics\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"701-720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Semantics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffz011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffz011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文探讨了现实蕴涵(ae)、否定和自由选择推论(FC)之间的联系。本文的主要经验焦点是(i)否定AE许可人会导致AE的否定,以及(ii)当AE许可人嵌入歧义时,不会产生FC推论。我从第一个发现中对ae理论提出了挑战,并在结论中提供了荷马(2011)对它们的方面转移描述的规定修订。然后,我从第二个发现中对FC理论提出了挑战。我首先注意到这一发现对FC隐含理论的影响,其中第一个发现起着至关重要的作用,并讨论了解释AE/FC相互作用所需的假设。我还讨论了相互作用如何挑战从情态与析取present的组合中得出推论的FC理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Actuality Entailments and Free Choice
This paper concerns connections between Actuality Entailments (AEs), negation, and Free Choice inferences (FC). The main empirical foci of the paper are (i) that negated AElicensers entail the negation of the AE, and (ii) that AE-licensers do not give rise to FC inferences when they embed disjunctions. I derive challenges from the first finding to theories of AEs, and offer in conclusion a stipulative revision of Homer’s (2011) aspect-shift account of them. I then derive challenges from the second finding to theories of FC. I note first the consequences of the finding to implicature-theories of FC, where the first finding plays a crucial role, and discuss the assumptions needed to explain the AE/FC interaction. I also discuss how the interaction challenges theories of FC that derive the inference from the composition of modals with disjunctive prejacents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Semantics
Journal of Biomedical Semantics MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
28
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Semantics addresses issues of semantic enrichment and semantic processing in the biomedical domain. The scope of the journal covers two main areas: Infrastructure for biomedical semantics: focusing on semantic resources and repositories, meta-data management and resource description, knowledge representation and semantic frameworks, the Biomedical Semantic Web, and semantic interoperability. Semantic mining, annotation, and analysis: focusing on approaches and applications of semantic resources; and tools for investigation, reasoning, prediction, and discoveries in biomedicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信