{"title":"强化采油气体流度曲线的实验评价","authors":"Ofasa Abunumah, Priscilla Ogunlude, E. Gobina","doi":"10.4236/ACES.2021.112010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mobility profiles of gases used in enhanced oil \nrecovery (EOR) have been thoroughly investigated through the coupling \noperations of data mining of oilfield data and experimental data analyses. \nMobility as an EOR objective function has not been previously applied to \ncharacterize potential reservoirs for EOR selection and application, even \nthough it is a robust combinatorial function that benefits from two \npetrophysical variables, permeability and viscosity. The data mining approach \nidentified mobility as a reliable objective function for reservoir \ncharacterisation. The data distribution and clustering results indicate that Gas EOR reservoirs have \nrelatively higher mean mobility than Thermal, Microbial and Chemical EOR \nreservoirs. The experimental approach investigated EOR gases, CO2, \nCH4, N2, and Air. A modified Darcy Equation of State for \ngas flow through porous media was applied to evaluate which gas would \ncompetitively attain the oil displacement optimisation criterion for mobility \nratio, M ≤ 1. Coupling the data mining with the experimental data results \nreveals that gas reservoirs can be further categorized by mobility. CH4 (18.16 mD/cp) was observed to have the \nhighest mobility followed by Air (14.60 mD/cp), \nN2 (13.61 mD/cp), and CO2 (12.96 mD/cp). The gas mobility order \nsignificantly corresponds with the mobility distribution of reservoirs that \nimplemented gas EOR processes. It was concluded that CO2 offers \nrelatively lower mobility, therefore, it is the most competitive EOR gas to \napproach the mobility ratio criterion of unity or less.","PeriodicalId":7332,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science","volume":"37 1","pages":"154-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Evaluation of the Mobility Profile of Enhanced Oil Recovery Gases\",\"authors\":\"Ofasa Abunumah, Priscilla Ogunlude, E. Gobina\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ACES.2021.112010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The mobility profiles of gases used in enhanced oil \\nrecovery (EOR) have been thoroughly investigated through the coupling \\noperations of data mining of oilfield data and experimental data analyses. \\nMobility as an EOR objective function has not been previously applied to \\ncharacterize potential reservoirs for EOR selection and application, even \\nthough it is a robust combinatorial function that benefits from two \\npetrophysical variables, permeability and viscosity. The data mining approach \\nidentified mobility as a reliable objective function for reservoir \\ncharacterisation. The data distribution and clustering results indicate that Gas EOR reservoirs have \\nrelatively higher mean mobility than Thermal, Microbial and Chemical EOR \\nreservoirs. The experimental approach investigated EOR gases, CO2, \\nCH4, N2, and Air. A modified Darcy Equation of State for \\ngas flow through porous media was applied to evaluate which gas would \\ncompetitively attain the oil displacement optimisation criterion for mobility \\nratio, M ≤ 1. Coupling the data mining with the experimental data results \\nreveals that gas reservoirs can be further categorized by mobility. CH4 (18.16 mD/cp) was observed to have the \\nhighest mobility followed by Air (14.60 mD/cp), \\nN2 (13.61 mD/cp), and CO2 (12.96 mD/cp). The gas mobility order \\nsignificantly corresponds with the mobility distribution of reservoirs that \\nimplemented gas EOR processes. It was concluded that CO2 offers \\nrelatively lower mobility, therefore, it is the most competitive EOR gas to \\napproach the mobility ratio criterion of unity or less.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"154-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ACES.2021.112010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ACES.2021.112010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
通过对油田数据的数据挖掘和实验数据分析的耦合操作,对提高采收率(EOR)所用气体的运移曲线进行了深入的研究。尽管流动性是一个强大的组合函数,可以从渗透率和粘度这两个岩石物理变量中获益,但作为EOR目标函数,之前还没有应用于描述潜在储层的EOR选择和应用。数据挖掘方法将流动性确定为储层表征的可靠目标函数。数据分布和聚类结果表明,天然气提高采收率储层的平均流度高于热力、微生物和化学提高采收率储层。实验方法研究了EOR气体、CO2、CH4、N2和Air。采用修正的达西状态方程(Darcy State Equation of gas流过多孔介质)来评估哪些气体能够竞争达到流度比M≤1的驱油优化准则。将数据挖掘与实验数据结果相结合,可以进一步通过流动性对气藏进行分类。CH4 (18.16 mD/cp)的迁移率最高,其次是空气(14.60 mD/cp)、N2 (13.61 mD/cp)和CO2 (12.96 mD/cp)。气相运移顺序与实施了提高采收率的储层的运移分布有显著的对应关系。综上所示,CO2的流度相对较低,接近等于或小于等于流度比标准是最具竞争力的提高采收率气体。
Experimental Evaluation of the Mobility Profile of Enhanced Oil Recovery Gases
The mobility profiles of gases used in enhanced oil
recovery (EOR) have been thoroughly investigated through the coupling
operations of data mining of oilfield data and experimental data analyses.
Mobility as an EOR objective function has not been previously applied to
characterize potential reservoirs for EOR selection and application, even
though it is a robust combinatorial function that benefits from two
petrophysical variables, permeability and viscosity. The data mining approach
identified mobility as a reliable objective function for reservoir
characterisation. The data distribution and clustering results indicate that Gas EOR reservoirs have
relatively higher mean mobility than Thermal, Microbial and Chemical EOR
reservoirs. The experimental approach investigated EOR gases, CO2,
CH4, N2, and Air. A modified Darcy Equation of State for
gas flow through porous media was applied to evaluate which gas would
competitively attain the oil displacement optimisation criterion for mobility
ratio, M ≤ 1. Coupling the data mining with the experimental data results
reveals that gas reservoirs can be further categorized by mobility. CH4 (18.16 mD/cp) was observed to have the
highest mobility followed by Air (14.60 mD/cp),
N2 (13.61 mD/cp), and CO2 (12.96 mD/cp). The gas mobility order
significantly corresponds with the mobility distribution of reservoirs that
implemented gas EOR processes. It was concluded that CO2 offers
relatively lower mobility, therefore, it is the most competitive EOR gas to
approach the mobility ratio criterion of unity or less.