2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在线教育中的建筑设计交流(ADC):土耳其和西班牙大学的比较

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Ayşegül Akçay Kavakoğlu, Derya Güleç Özer, Débora Domingo-Callabuig, Ömer Bilen
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在线教育中的建筑设计交流(ADC):土耳其和西班牙大学的比较","authors":"Ayşegül Akçay Kavakoğlu, Derya Güleç Özer, Débora Domingo-Callabuig, Ömer Bilen","doi":"10.1108/ohi-07-2021-0144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe paper aims to examine the concept of architectural design communication (ADC) for updating design studio dynamics in architectural education during the Covid-19 pandemic. Within this perspective, the changing and transforming contents of architectural education, the thinking, representation and production mediums are examined through the determined components of ADC. There are five components in the study, which are (1) Effective Language Use, (2) Effective use of Handcrafts, (3) Effective Technical Drawing Knowledge, (4) Effective Architectural Software Knowledge and (5) Outputs.Design/methodology/approachThe research method is based on qualitative and quantitative methods; a survey study is applied and the comparative results are evaluated with the path analysis method. The students in the Department of Architecture of two universities have been selected as the target audience. Case study 1 survey is applied to Altinbas University (AU) and Case study 2 survey is applied to Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (UPV) students during the COVID-19 pandemic; ‘19-‘20 spring term, online education.FindingsAs a result, two-path analysis diagrams are produced for two universities, and a comparative analysis is presented to reveal the relationships of the selected ADC components.Originality/valueThis paper fulfills an identified need to study how ADC can be developed in online education platforms.","PeriodicalId":44969,"journal":{"name":"Open House International","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Architectural design communication (ADC) in online education during COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of Turkish and Spanish universities\",\"authors\":\"Ayşegül Akçay Kavakoğlu, Derya Güleç Özer, Débora Domingo-Callabuig, Ömer Bilen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ohi-07-2021-0144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe paper aims to examine the concept of architectural design communication (ADC) for updating design studio dynamics in architectural education during the Covid-19 pandemic. Within this perspective, the changing and transforming contents of architectural education, the thinking, representation and production mediums are examined through the determined components of ADC. There are five components in the study, which are (1) Effective Language Use, (2) Effective use of Handcrafts, (3) Effective Technical Drawing Knowledge, (4) Effective Architectural Software Knowledge and (5) Outputs.Design/methodology/approachThe research method is based on qualitative and quantitative methods; a survey study is applied and the comparative results are evaluated with the path analysis method. The students in the Department of Architecture of two universities have been selected as the target audience. Case study 1 survey is applied to Altinbas University (AU) and Case study 2 survey is applied to Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (UPV) students during the COVID-19 pandemic; ‘19-‘20 spring term, online education.FindingsAs a result, two-path analysis diagrams are produced for two universities, and a comparative analysis is presented to reveal the relationships of the selected ADC components.Originality/valueThis paper fulfills an identified need to study how ADC can be developed in online education platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open House International\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open House International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-07-2021-0144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open House International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-07-2021-0144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文旨在探讨建筑设计沟通(ADC)的概念,以在2019冠状病毒病(Covid-19)大流行期间更新建筑教育中的设计工作室动态。在这一视角下,通过ADC的确定组成部分来审视建筑教育内容、思维、表现和生产媒介的变化和转变。研究中有五个组成部分,分别是(1)有效的语言使用,(2)有效的手工使用,(3)有效的技术绘图知识,(4)有效的建筑软件知识和(5)输出。设计/方法/方法研究方法是基于定性和定量的方法;采用了调查研究方法,并用通径分析法对对比结果进行了评价。选择了两所大学建筑系的学生作为目标受众。案例研究1调查应用于阿尔廷巴斯大学(AU),案例研究2调查应用于瓦伦西亚理工大学(UPV)的学生在COVID-19大流行期间;19- 20年春季学期,在线教育。结果得出了两所大学的双路分析图,并进行了比较分析,揭示了所选ADC元件之间的关系。原创性/价值本文满足了研究在线教育平台如何开发ADC的明确需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Architectural design communication (ADC) in online education during COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of Turkish and Spanish universities
PurposeThe paper aims to examine the concept of architectural design communication (ADC) for updating design studio dynamics in architectural education during the Covid-19 pandemic. Within this perspective, the changing and transforming contents of architectural education, the thinking, representation and production mediums are examined through the determined components of ADC. There are five components in the study, which are (1) Effective Language Use, (2) Effective use of Handcrafts, (3) Effective Technical Drawing Knowledge, (4) Effective Architectural Software Knowledge and (5) Outputs.Design/methodology/approachThe research method is based on qualitative and quantitative methods; a survey study is applied and the comparative results are evaluated with the path analysis method. The students in the Department of Architecture of two universities have been selected as the target audience. Case study 1 survey is applied to Altinbas University (AU) and Case study 2 survey is applied to Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (UPV) students during the COVID-19 pandemic; ‘19-‘20 spring term, online education.FindingsAs a result, two-path analysis diagrams are produced for two universities, and a comparative analysis is presented to reveal the relationships of the selected ADC components.Originality/valueThis paper fulfills an identified need to study how ADC can be developed in online education platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The journal of an association of institues and individuals concerned with housing, design and development in the built environment. Theories, tools and pratice with special emphasis on the local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信