{"title":"破坏性实验","authors":"Cortney S. Rodet, Andrew Smyth","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3435205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report results from a novel experiment where participants invest an endowment across multiple options, with investment in one option disrupting (reducing) the value of another option. While expected payoff maximization predicts the comparative statics of aggregate investment well, it does not precisely predict investment levels. However, when conditioned on observed investment in a riskless outside option, expected payoff maximization better predicts investment levels. At the participant level, investment variability increases in disruption.","PeriodicalId":14586,"journal":{"name":"IO: Productivity","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Disruption Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Cortney S. Rodet, Andrew Smyth\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3435205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We report results from a novel experiment where participants invest an endowment across multiple options, with investment in one option disrupting (reducing) the value of another option. While expected payoff maximization predicts the comparative statics of aggregate investment well, it does not precisely predict investment levels. However, when conditioned on observed investment in a riskless outside option, expected payoff maximization better predicts investment levels. At the participant level, investment variability increases in disruption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IO: Productivity\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IO: Productivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3435205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Productivity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3435205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We report results from a novel experiment where participants invest an endowment across multiple options, with investment in one option disrupting (reducing) the value of another option. While expected payoff maximization predicts the comparative statics of aggregate investment well, it does not precisely predict investment levels. However, when conditioned on observed investment in a riskless outside option, expected payoff maximization better predicts investment levels. At the participant level, investment variability increases in disruption.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
