澳大利亚年轻人的媒体实践:对数字鸿沟的有形和可衡量的反思

Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.17646/kome.75672.42
L. Gaspard, H. Horst, Edgar Gómez Cruz, S. Pink
{"title":"澳大利亚年轻人的媒体实践:对数字鸿沟的有形和可衡量的反思","authors":"L. Gaspard, H. Horst, Edgar Gómez Cruz, S. Pink","doi":"10.17646/kome.75672.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper presents findings on the household availability of digital media devices and the uses made of this technology by young people aged 12 to 18 living within the Greater Melbourne area of Australia. Drawing upon questionnaire data from a purposive sample of 860 students frequency analysis of this data indicates three dominant factors shape a young person’s media experience: gender, siblings present within the home, and parents’ highest level of education 1 . Moreover, when examining the types of software programs and the social network services used by young people age emerges as an additional layer to understanding these practices. In order to help contextualise these digital engagements, a comparative analysis with youth in the UK and the USA is undertaken to explore the ongoing validity of previous research claiming Australian youth as being some of the most digitally connected youth in the world. This paper presents findings from Australian data collected as part of a larger European Union Horizon 20/20 funded eight-nation research project entitled Transmedia Literacy: Exploiting transmedia skills and informal learning strategies to improve formal education . Analysing questionnaire data collected from young people living in Melbourne, Australia, patterns emerge to the types of media used and the types of activities engaged. Three distinct factors emerge as shaping the media engagement throughout this cohort: a participant’s gender, whether they have siblings within the household and parents’ highest level of education; while age and gender are also essential to understanding the types of software programs and the social network services (SNS) they use. In order to contextualise the practices of these Australian youth comparative analysis is performed against data from youth in the UK and USA over a similar period to examine the commonality and differences to media engagements of young people within the world’s three principle Anglophone nations. Outside of government and state regulatory funded research bodies (i.e. the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) and Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)) findings presented here add to the limited body of work providing large-scale analysis to the media practices of Australian youth 2 . Similarly, this work adds to previous research, which establishes how the term gradation rather than divide better defines the digital media","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Media practices of young Australians: Tangible and measurable reflections on a digital divide\",\"authors\":\"L. Gaspard, H. Horst, Edgar Gómez Cruz, S. Pink\",\"doi\":\"10.17646/kome.75672.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This paper presents findings on the household availability of digital media devices and the uses made of this technology by young people aged 12 to 18 living within the Greater Melbourne area of Australia. Drawing upon questionnaire data from a purposive sample of 860 students frequency analysis of this data indicates three dominant factors shape a young person’s media experience: gender, siblings present within the home, and parents’ highest level of education 1 . Moreover, when examining the types of software programs and the social network services used by young people age emerges as an additional layer to understanding these practices. In order to help contextualise these digital engagements, a comparative analysis with youth in the UK and the USA is undertaken to explore the ongoing validity of previous research claiming Australian youth as being some of the most digitally connected youth in the world. This paper presents findings from Australian data collected as part of a larger European Union Horizon 20/20 funded eight-nation research project entitled Transmedia Literacy: Exploiting transmedia skills and informal learning strategies to improve formal education . Analysing questionnaire data collected from young people living in Melbourne, Australia, patterns emerge to the types of media used and the types of activities engaged. Three distinct factors emerge as shaping the media engagement throughout this cohort: a participant’s gender, whether they have siblings within the household and parents’ highest level of education; while age and gender are also essential to understanding the types of software programs and the social network services (SNS) they use. In order to contextualise the practices of these Australian youth comparative analysis is performed against data from youth in the UK and USA over a similar period to examine the commonality and differences to media engagements of young people within the world’s three principle Anglophone nations. Outside of government and state regulatory funded research bodies (i.e. the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) and Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)) findings presented here add to the limited body of work providing large-scale analysis to the media practices of Australian youth 2 . Similarly, this work adds to previous research, which establishes how the term gradation rather than divide better defines the digital media\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17646/kome.75672.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17646/kome.75672.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文介绍了生活在澳大利亚大墨尔本地区的12至18岁的年轻人对数字媒体设备的家庭可用性和对这项技术的使用的调查结果。根据860名学生的调查问卷数据,对这些数据的频率分析表明,影响年轻人媒体体验的主要因素有三个:性别、家中的兄弟姐妹和父母的最高教育水平。此外,在研究年轻人使用的软件程序和社交网络服务的类型时,年龄是理解这些行为的一个额外层面。为了帮助将这些数字接触置于背景中,我们对英国和美国的年轻人进行了比较分析,以探索先前研究的有效性,该研究声称澳大利亚年轻人是世界上数字连接最多的年轻人之一。本文介绍了来自澳大利亚的数据,这些数据是欧盟地平线20/20资助的八国研究项目“跨媒体素养:利用跨媒体技能和非正式学习策略来改善正规教育”的一部分。通过分析从澳大利亚墨尔本的年轻人那里收集到的问卷数据,我们发现了他们使用的媒体类型和参与的活动类型的模式。在这个群体中,有三个不同的因素影响着媒体的参与:参与者的性别,他们是否有兄弟姐妹,父母的教育水平是否最高;而年龄和性别对于理解软件程序的类型和他们使用的社交网络服务(SNS)也很重要。为了将这些澳大利亚青年的做法置于背景中,对英国和美国青年在类似时期的数据进行了比较分析,以检查世界三个主要英语国家中年轻人对媒体参与的共性和差异。在政府和国家监管机构资助的研究机构(即澳大利亚统计局(ABS)和澳大利亚通信和媒体管理局(ACMA))之外,本文提出的研究结果补充了对澳大利亚青年媒体实践进行大规模分析的有限工作。类似地,这项工作补充了先前的研究,该研究确定了术语渐变而不是划分如何更好地定义数字媒体
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Media practices of young Australians: Tangible and measurable reflections on a digital divide
: This paper presents findings on the household availability of digital media devices and the uses made of this technology by young people aged 12 to 18 living within the Greater Melbourne area of Australia. Drawing upon questionnaire data from a purposive sample of 860 students frequency analysis of this data indicates three dominant factors shape a young person’s media experience: gender, siblings present within the home, and parents’ highest level of education 1 . Moreover, when examining the types of software programs and the social network services used by young people age emerges as an additional layer to understanding these practices. In order to help contextualise these digital engagements, a comparative analysis with youth in the UK and the USA is undertaken to explore the ongoing validity of previous research claiming Australian youth as being some of the most digitally connected youth in the world. This paper presents findings from Australian data collected as part of a larger European Union Horizon 20/20 funded eight-nation research project entitled Transmedia Literacy: Exploiting transmedia skills and informal learning strategies to improve formal education . Analysing questionnaire data collected from young people living in Melbourne, Australia, patterns emerge to the types of media used and the types of activities engaged. Three distinct factors emerge as shaping the media engagement throughout this cohort: a participant’s gender, whether they have siblings within the household and parents’ highest level of education; while age and gender are also essential to understanding the types of software programs and the social network services (SNS) they use. In order to contextualise the practices of these Australian youth comparative analysis is performed against data from youth in the UK and USA over a similar period to examine the commonality and differences to media engagements of young people within the world’s three principle Anglophone nations. Outside of government and state regulatory funded research bodies (i.e. the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) and Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)) findings presented here add to the limited body of work providing large-scale analysis to the media practices of Australian youth 2 . Similarly, this work adds to previous research, which establishes how the term gradation rather than divide better defines the digital media
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信