有些人比其他人更白:种族沙文主义是1890-1963年罗德西亚移民政策的一个因素

Zambezia Pub Date : 2000-02-01 DOI:10.4314/ZJH.V27I2.6748
A. Mlambo
{"title":"有些人比其他人更白:种族沙文主义是1890-1963年罗德西亚移民政策的一个因素","authors":"A. Mlambo","doi":"10.4314/ZJH.V27I2.6748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the role of ethnic chauvinism in determining the \npatterns and trends of white immigration into Rhodesia from the country’s \noccupation in 1890 to the Second World War. It argues that, while scholars \nhave rightly emphasised white settler racism and discrimination against the \nAfrican majority, and have tended to treat settler white society as a \nhomogenous entity which shared a common identity, a closer examination \nof the racial dynamics within white colonial society reveals that strong \ncurrents of ethnic chauvinism maintained sharp divisions within the white \nsettler society, even though settlers presented a united front when protecting \ntheir collective interests in the face of the perceived African threat. This \narticle focuses specifically on racial and cultural chauvinism emanating \nfrom settlers of British stock which, among other things, determined the \npace, volume and nature of white immigration into the country and \ncontributed, together with other factors, to the fact that fewer white immigrants \nentered the country than had originally been envisaged by Cecil John \nRhodes. Thus, while Rhodes had dreamt of creating Rhodesia as a white \nman’s country, this dream remained unfulfilled because of the dominant \nBritish settler community’s reluctance to admit whites of non-British stock. It \nis argued, therefore, that, throughout the period under study, British colonial \nsettlers continued to regard themselves as “more white than others” with \nrespect to other non-British races.","PeriodicalId":83564,"journal":{"name":"Zambezia","volume":"18 1","pages":"139-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some are more white than others: racial chauvinism as a factor in Rhodesian immigration policy, 1890-1963\",\"authors\":\"A. Mlambo\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ZJH.V27I2.6748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the role of ethnic chauvinism in determining the \\npatterns and trends of white immigration into Rhodesia from the country’s \\noccupation in 1890 to the Second World War. It argues that, while scholars \\nhave rightly emphasised white settler racism and discrimination against the \\nAfrican majority, and have tended to treat settler white society as a \\nhomogenous entity which shared a common identity, a closer examination \\nof the racial dynamics within white colonial society reveals that strong \\ncurrents of ethnic chauvinism maintained sharp divisions within the white \\nsettler society, even though settlers presented a united front when protecting \\ntheir collective interests in the face of the perceived African threat. This \\narticle focuses specifically on racial and cultural chauvinism emanating \\nfrom settlers of British stock which, among other things, determined the \\npace, volume and nature of white immigration into the country and \\ncontributed, together with other factors, to the fact that fewer white immigrants \\nentered the country than had originally been envisaged by Cecil John \\nRhodes. Thus, while Rhodes had dreamt of creating Rhodesia as a white \\nman’s country, this dream remained unfulfilled because of the dominant \\nBritish settler community’s reluctance to admit whites of non-British stock. It \\nis argued, therefore, that, throughout the period under study, British colonial \\nsettlers continued to regard themselves as “more white than others” with \\nrespect to other non-British races.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zambezia\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"139-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zambezia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZJH.V27I2.6748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zambezia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZJH.V27I2.6748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

本文分析了种族沙文主义在决定1890年该国被占领至第二次世界大战期间进入罗得西亚的白人移民模式和趋势中的作用。它认为,虽然学者们正确地强调了白人移民的种族主义和对非洲多数人的歧视,并倾向于将移民白人社会视为一个具有共同身份的同质实体,但对白人殖民社会内部种族动态的更仔细研究表明,强烈的种族沙文主义在白人移民社会内部保持着尖锐的分裂。尽管在面对非洲威胁时,定居者们在保护集体利益时表现出了统一战线。本文特别侧重于英国血统的定居者所产生的种族和文化沙文主义,除其他外,这种沙文主义决定了进入该国的白人移民的速度、数量和性质,并与其他因素一起导致进入该国的白人移民比塞西尔·约翰·罗兹最初设想的要少。因此,虽然罗德岛曾梦想将罗得西亚建成一个白人国家,但由于占主导地位的英国定居者社区不愿接纳非英国血统的白人,这个梦想未能实现。因此,有人认为,在整个研究期间,英国殖民定居者继续认为自己比其他非英国种族的“œmore白人”更白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some are more white than others: racial chauvinism as a factor in Rhodesian immigration policy, 1890-1963
This article analyses the role of ethnic chauvinism in determining the patterns and trends of white immigration into Rhodesia from the country’s occupation in 1890 to the Second World War. It argues that, while scholars have rightly emphasised white settler racism and discrimination against the African majority, and have tended to treat settler white society as a homogenous entity which shared a common identity, a closer examination of the racial dynamics within white colonial society reveals that strong currents of ethnic chauvinism maintained sharp divisions within the white settler society, even though settlers presented a united front when protecting their collective interests in the face of the perceived African threat. This article focuses specifically on racial and cultural chauvinism emanating from settlers of British stock which, among other things, determined the pace, volume and nature of white immigration into the country and contributed, together with other factors, to the fact that fewer white immigrants entered the country than had originally been envisaged by Cecil John Rhodes. Thus, while Rhodes had dreamt of creating Rhodesia as a white man’s country, this dream remained unfulfilled because of the dominant British settler community’s reluctance to admit whites of non-British stock. It is argued, therefore, that, throughout the period under study, British colonial settlers continued to regard themselves as “more white than others” with respect to other non-British races.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信