{"title":"有些人比其他人更白:种族沙文主义是1890-1963年罗德西亚移民政策的一个因素","authors":"A. Mlambo","doi":"10.4314/ZJH.V27I2.6748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the role of ethnic chauvinism in determining the \npatterns and trends of white immigration into Rhodesia from the country’s \noccupation in 1890 to the Second World War. It argues that, while scholars \nhave rightly emphasised white settler racism and discrimination against the \nAfrican majority, and have tended to treat settler white society as a \nhomogenous entity which shared a common identity, a closer examination \nof the racial dynamics within white colonial society reveals that strong \ncurrents of ethnic chauvinism maintained sharp divisions within the white \nsettler society, even though settlers presented a united front when protecting \ntheir collective interests in the face of the perceived African threat. This \narticle focuses specifically on racial and cultural chauvinism emanating \nfrom settlers of British stock which, among other things, determined the \npace, volume and nature of white immigration into the country and \ncontributed, together with other factors, to the fact that fewer white immigrants \nentered the country than had originally been envisaged by Cecil John \nRhodes. Thus, while Rhodes had dreamt of creating Rhodesia as a white \nman’s country, this dream remained unfulfilled because of the dominant \nBritish settler community’s reluctance to admit whites of non-British stock. It \nis argued, therefore, that, throughout the period under study, British colonial \nsettlers continued to regard themselves as “more white than others†with \nrespect to other non-British races.","PeriodicalId":83564,"journal":{"name":"Zambezia","volume":"18 1","pages":"139-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some are more white than others: racial chauvinism as a factor in Rhodesian immigration policy, 1890-1963\",\"authors\":\"A. Mlambo\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ZJH.V27I2.6748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the role of ethnic chauvinism in determining the \\npatterns and trends of white immigration into Rhodesia from the country’s \\noccupation in 1890 to the Second World War. It argues that, while scholars \\nhave rightly emphasised white settler racism and discrimination against the \\nAfrican majority, and have tended to treat settler white society as a \\nhomogenous entity which shared a common identity, a closer examination \\nof the racial dynamics within white colonial society reveals that strong \\ncurrents of ethnic chauvinism maintained sharp divisions within the white \\nsettler society, even though settlers presented a united front when protecting \\ntheir collective interests in the face of the perceived African threat. This \\narticle focuses specifically on racial and cultural chauvinism emanating \\nfrom settlers of British stock which, among other things, determined the \\npace, volume and nature of white immigration into the country and \\ncontributed, together with other factors, to the fact that fewer white immigrants \\nentered the country than had originally been envisaged by Cecil John \\nRhodes. Thus, while Rhodes had dreamt of creating Rhodesia as a white \\nman’s country, this dream remained unfulfilled because of the dominant \\nBritish settler community’s reluctance to admit whites of non-British stock. It \\nis argued, therefore, that, throughout the period under study, British colonial \\nsettlers continued to regard themselves as “more white than others†with \\nrespect to other non-British races.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zambezia\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"139-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zambezia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZJH.V27I2.6748\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zambezia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZJH.V27I2.6748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Some are more white than others: racial chauvinism as a factor in Rhodesian immigration policy, 1890-1963
This article analyses the role of ethnic chauvinism in determining the
patterns and trends of white immigration into Rhodesia from the country’s
occupation in 1890 to the Second World War. It argues that, while scholars
have rightly emphasised white settler racism and discrimination against the
African majority, and have tended to treat settler white society as a
homogenous entity which shared a common identity, a closer examination
of the racial dynamics within white colonial society reveals that strong
currents of ethnic chauvinism maintained sharp divisions within the white
settler society, even though settlers presented a united front when protecting
their collective interests in the face of the perceived African threat. This
article focuses specifically on racial and cultural chauvinism emanating
from settlers of British stock which, among other things, determined the
pace, volume and nature of white immigration into the country and
contributed, together with other factors, to the fact that fewer white immigrants
entered the country than had originally been envisaged by Cecil John
Rhodes. Thus, while Rhodes had dreamt of creating Rhodesia as a white
man’s country, this dream remained unfulfilled because of the dominant
British settler community’s reluctance to admit whites of non-British stock. It
is argued, therefore, that, throughout the period under study, British colonial
settlers continued to regard themselves as “more white than others†with
respect to other non-British races.