欧盟法院准予临时措施程序中的初步证据要求

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
De Jure Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.54664/gwds3997
I. Baychev
{"title":"欧盟法院准予临时措施程序中的初步证据要求","authors":"I. Baychev","doi":"10.54664/gwds3997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the powers of the Court of Justice of the European Union to evaluate the prima facie case in the course of proceedings under Articles 278 and 279 of the TFEU when granting interim measures. It examines the CJEU’s case law to determine what “prima facie” means in the context of the prohibition to prejudge the main case.","PeriodicalId":41915,"journal":{"name":"De Jure","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prima Facie Requirement in Procedures for Granting Interim Measures Before the Court of Justice of the European Union\",\"authors\":\"I. Baychev\",\"doi\":\"10.54664/gwds3997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the powers of the Court of Justice of the European Union to evaluate the prima facie case in the course of proceedings under Articles 278 and 279 of the TFEU when granting interim measures. It examines the CJEU’s case law to determine what “prima facie” means in the context of the prohibition to prejudge the main case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"De Jure\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"De Jure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54664/gwds3997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54664/gwds3997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了欧盟法院在根据《欧盟自由贸易条约》第278条和第279条授予临时措施时在诉讼过程中评估初步证据案件的权力。它审查了欧洲法院的判例法,以确定在禁止对主要案件进行预判的情况下,“初步证据”是什么意思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Prima Facie Requirement in Procedures for Granting Interim Measures Before the Court of Justice of the European Union
This article analyzes the powers of the Court of Justice of the European Union to evaluate the prima facie case in the course of proceedings under Articles 278 and 279 of the TFEU when granting interim measures. It examines the CJEU’s case law to determine what “prima facie” means in the context of the prohibition to prejudge the main case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
De Jure
De Jure LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信