南非对通奸的诉讼——普通法、习惯法和宪法观点

Q4 Social Sciences
A. Barratt
{"title":"南非对通奸的诉讼——普通法、习惯法和宪法观点","authors":"A. Barratt","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2017.10008257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Africa's highest courts recently abolished the common law action for adultery. In 2014, the Supreme Court of Appeal abolished the action on the ground that the conduct did not satisfy the wrongfulness requirement for delictual liability In 2015, the Constitutional Court confirmed abolition of the adultery remedy on constitutional grounds. These judgments did not consider the customary law adultery actions. South Africa's customary law systems will retain their adultery remedies unless these actions are also abolished. The Supreme Court of Appeal's reasoning might not be applicable to the customary law actions. It is also not certain that the Constitutional Court's reasoning will necessarily have the outcome that customary law actions for adultery must be abolished on constitutional grounds. It might be possible to argue that the sexual delicts in customary law are integrally linked to traditional customary marriage and thus protected by the constitutional right to culture. However, this argument appears weak in the context of the adultery remedy, as that remedy is not linked to core features of traditional culture. Thus the customary law action for adultery should also be abolished on constitutional grounds.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"103 1","pages":"237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The South African action for adultery - common law, customary law, and constitutional perspectives\",\"authors\":\"A. Barratt\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2017.10008257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"South Africa's highest courts recently abolished the common law action for adultery. In 2014, the Supreme Court of Appeal abolished the action on the ground that the conduct did not satisfy the wrongfulness requirement for delictual liability In 2015, the Constitutional Court confirmed abolition of the adultery remedy on constitutional grounds. These judgments did not consider the customary law adultery actions. South Africa's customary law systems will retain their adultery remedies unless these actions are also abolished. The Supreme Court of Appeal's reasoning might not be applicable to the customary law actions. It is also not certain that the Constitutional Court's reasoning will necessarily have the outcome that customary law actions for adultery must be abolished on constitutional grounds. It might be possible to argue that the sexual delicts in customary law are integrally linked to traditional customary marriage and thus protected by the constitutional right to culture. However, this argument appears weak in the context of the adultery remedy, as that remedy is not linked to core features of traditional culture. Thus the customary law action for adultery should also be abolished on constitutional grounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2017.10008257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2017.10008257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南非最高法院最近废除了通奸罪的普通法诉讼。2014年,最高上诉法院以该行为不符合过失责任的过错要件为由撤销了该诉讼;2015年,宪法法院以宪法理由确认了通奸救济的废除。这些判决没有考虑习惯法中的通奸行为。南非的习惯法制度将保留其通奸补救措施,除非这些行动也被废除。最高上诉法院的推理可能不适用于习惯法诉讼。宪法法院的推理也不确定是否一定会导致习惯法上的通奸行为必须以宪法为由废除的结果。也许可以争辩说,习惯法中的性不法行为与传统的习惯法婚姻是有机地联系在一起的,因此受到宪法文化权利的保护。然而,这一论点在通奸补救措施的背景下显得软弱无力,因为这种补救措施与传统文化的核心特征没有联系。因此,习惯法对通奸的诉讼也应基于宪法理由予以废除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The South African action for adultery - common law, customary law, and constitutional perspectives
South Africa's highest courts recently abolished the common law action for adultery. In 2014, the Supreme Court of Appeal abolished the action on the ground that the conduct did not satisfy the wrongfulness requirement for delictual liability In 2015, the Constitutional Court confirmed abolition of the adultery remedy on constitutional grounds. These judgments did not consider the customary law adultery actions. South Africa's customary law systems will retain their adultery remedies unless these actions are also abolished. The Supreme Court of Appeal's reasoning might not be applicable to the customary law actions. It is also not certain that the Constitutional Court's reasoning will necessarily have the outcome that customary law actions for adultery must be abolished on constitutional grounds. It might be possible to argue that the sexual delicts in customary law are integrally linked to traditional customary marriage and thus protected by the constitutional right to culture. However, this argument appears weak in the context of the adultery remedy, as that remedy is not linked to core features of traditional culture. Thus the customary law action for adultery should also be abolished on constitutional grounds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信