房颤患者CHA2DS2-VASc评分与死亡风险的关系

A. Aro, J. Haukka, O. Halminen, J. Putaala, M. Linna, P. Mustonen, J. Hartikainen, J. Airaksinen, M. Lehto
{"title":"房颤患者CHA2DS2-VASc评分与死亡风险的关系","authors":"A. Aro, J. Haukka, O. Halminen, J. Putaala, M. Linna, P. Mustonen, J. Hartikainen, J. Airaksinen, M. Lehto","doi":"10.1093/europace/euac053.144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Sigrid Juselius Foundation\n \n \n \n Atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognized as a major public health problem due to increased mortality, morbidity and risk of stroke. Advanced age and burden of other comorbidities are potential contributors to AF development and adverse outcomes. Clinical risk factor based CHA2DS2-VASc score is widely used to assess thromboembolic risk in AF, but mortality risk associated with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores is not established.\n \n \n \n Using data from a nationwide AF registry study including comorbidities and outcomes of unselected AF patients, we wanted to study whether CHA2DS2-VASc score could be useful in estimating prognosis in newly diagnosed AF patients.\n \n \n \n New-onset AF patients in Finland 2007-2017 were identified from comprehensive national registries. Comorbidities were gathered from individualized registry data on drug reimbursements and from ICD-10 diagnoses during hospitalizations and outpatient visits in primary and specialist care. These were used to create CHA2DS2-VASc risk score for each AF patient at cohort entry, including data on heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease and sex. Patients were followed until the end of 2018 from the causes of death registry, which records every death in the country. All-cause mortality in each CHA2DS2-VASc category per 1000 person-years was determined, and relative risk (RR) of death according to the CHA2DS2-VASc category was calculated.\n \n \n \n A total of 229 357 patients with new-onset AF (mean age 73.2 ± 13.2 years, 50.0% female) were identified. Distribution of CHA2DS2-VASc score among these individuals is shown in Table. Mortality increased significantly with rising CHA2DS2-VASc risk score points, as demonstrated in Table. Compared to CHA2DS2-VASc 0, those with 2 points had a RR 2.9 (95%CI 2.7-3.1), 3 points RR 5.0 (4.7-5.3), 4 points RR 8.0 (7.5-8.4), 5 points RR 11.0 (10.4-11.7) and >5 points RR 14.8 (14.0-15.7) for all-cause mortality.\n \n \n \n In new-onset AF, mortality increased drastically with increasing age and comorbidities as depicted in the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Besides assessing thromboembolic risk, CHA2DS2-VASc score seems to be useful in estimating survival of AF patients.\n","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"32 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHA2DS2-VASc score and the risk of death in atrial fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"A. Aro, J. Haukka, O. Halminen, J. Putaala, M. Linna, P. Mustonen, J. Hartikainen, J. Airaksinen, M. Lehto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euac053.144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Sigrid Juselius Foundation\\n \\n \\n \\n Atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognized as a major public health problem due to increased mortality, morbidity and risk of stroke. Advanced age and burden of other comorbidities are potential contributors to AF development and adverse outcomes. Clinical risk factor based CHA2DS2-VASc score is widely used to assess thromboembolic risk in AF, but mortality risk associated with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores is not established.\\n \\n \\n \\n Using data from a nationwide AF registry study including comorbidities and outcomes of unselected AF patients, we wanted to study whether CHA2DS2-VASc score could be useful in estimating prognosis in newly diagnosed AF patients.\\n \\n \\n \\n New-onset AF patients in Finland 2007-2017 were identified from comprehensive national registries. Comorbidities were gathered from individualized registry data on drug reimbursements and from ICD-10 diagnoses during hospitalizations and outpatient visits in primary and specialist care. These were used to create CHA2DS2-VASc risk score for each AF patient at cohort entry, including data on heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease and sex. Patients were followed until the end of 2018 from the causes of death registry, which records every death in the country. All-cause mortality in each CHA2DS2-VASc category per 1000 person-years was determined, and relative risk (RR) of death according to the CHA2DS2-VASc category was calculated.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 229 357 patients with new-onset AF (mean age 73.2 ± 13.2 years, 50.0% female) were identified. Distribution of CHA2DS2-VASc score among these individuals is shown in Table. Mortality increased significantly with rising CHA2DS2-VASc risk score points, as demonstrated in Table. Compared to CHA2DS2-VASc 0, those with 2 points had a RR 2.9 (95%CI 2.7-3.1), 3 points RR 5.0 (4.7-5.3), 4 points RR 8.0 (7.5-8.4), 5 points RR 11.0 (10.4-11.7) and >5 points RR 14.8 (14.0-15.7) for all-cause mortality.\\n \\n \\n \\n In new-onset AF, mortality increased drastically with increasing age and comorbidities as depicted in the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Besides assessing thromboembolic risk, CHA2DS2-VASc score seems to be useful in estimating survival of AF patients.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EP Europace\",\"volume\":\"32 2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EP Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经费来源类型:基金会。主要资金来源:Sigrid Juselius基金会房颤(AF)由于死亡率、发病率和中风风险增加而被认为是一个主要的公共卫生问题。高龄和其他合并症负担是房颤发展和不良结局的潜在因素。基于临床危险因素的CHA2DS2-VASc评分被广泛用于评估房颤的血栓栓塞风险,但与不同CHA2DS2-VASc评分相关的死亡风险尚未建立。使用一项全国性房颤登记研究的数据,包括未选择房颤患者的合并症和结局,我们想研究CHA2DS2-VASc评分是否可以用于估计新诊断房颤患者的预后。芬兰2007-2017年的新发房颤患者是从国家综合登记处确定的。合并症收集自药物报销的个体化登记数据,以及初级和专科护理住院和门诊期间的ICD-10诊断。这些数据用于在队列输入时为每位AF患者创建CHA2DS2-VASc风险评分,包括心力衰竭、高血压、年龄、糖尿病、中风、血管疾病和性别的数据。从死亡原因登记处对患者进行跟踪,直到2018年底,该登记处记录了该国的每一起死亡。测定每个CHA2DS2-VASc类别每1000人年的全因死亡率,并计算CHA2DS2-VASc类别的相对死亡风险(RR)。新发房颤患者共229 357例(平均年龄73.2±13.2岁,女性50.0%)。CHA2DS2-VASc评分在这些个体中的分布如表所示。死亡率随CHA2DS2-VASc风险评分的升高而显著增加,见表。与CHA2DS2-VASc 0相比,2分的全因死亡率RR为2.9 (95%CI 2.7-3.1), 3分的RR为5.0(4.7-5.3),4分的RR为8.0(7.5-8.4),5分的RR为11.0(10.4-11.7),>5分的RR为14.8(14.0-15.7)。在新发房颤中,死亡率随着年龄和合并症的增加而急剧增加,如CHA2DS2-VASc评分所示。除了评估血栓栓塞风险外,CHA2DS2-VASc评分似乎可用于估计AF患者的生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CHA2DS2-VASc score and the risk of death in atrial fibrillation
Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Sigrid Juselius Foundation Atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognized as a major public health problem due to increased mortality, morbidity and risk of stroke. Advanced age and burden of other comorbidities are potential contributors to AF development and adverse outcomes. Clinical risk factor based CHA2DS2-VASc score is widely used to assess thromboembolic risk in AF, but mortality risk associated with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores is not established. Using data from a nationwide AF registry study including comorbidities and outcomes of unselected AF patients, we wanted to study whether CHA2DS2-VASc score could be useful in estimating prognosis in newly diagnosed AF patients. New-onset AF patients in Finland 2007-2017 were identified from comprehensive national registries. Comorbidities were gathered from individualized registry data on drug reimbursements and from ICD-10 diagnoses during hospitalizations and outpatient visits in primary and specialist care. These were used to create CHA2DS2-VASc risk score for each AF patient at cohort entry, including data on heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease and sex. Patients were followed until the end of 2018 from the causes of death registry, which records every death in the country. All-cause mortality in each CHA2DS2-VASc category per 1000 person-years was determined, and relative risk (RR) of death according to the CHA2DS2-VASc category was calculated. A total of 229 357 patients with new-onset AF (mean age 73.2 ± 13.2 years, 50.0% female) were identified. Distribution of CHA2DS2-VASc score among these individuals is shown in Table. Mortality increased significantly with rising CHA2DS2-VASc risk score points, as demonstrated in Table. Compared to CHA2DS2-VASc 0, those with 2 points had a RR 2.9 (95%CI 2.7-3.1), 3 points RR 5.0 (4.7-5.3), 4 points RR 8.0 (7.5-8.4), 5 points RR 11.0 (10.4-11.7) and >5 points RR 14.8 (14.0-15.7) for all-cause mortality. In new-onset AF, mortality increased drastically with increasing age and comorbidities as depicted in the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Besides assessing thromboembolic risk, CHA2DS2-VASc score seems to be useful in estimating survival of AF patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信