欧盟法律下的在线赌博:在赌博机会的控制扩张和真正减少之间徘徊

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Janja Hojnik
{"title":"欧盟法律下的在线赌博:在赌博机会的控制扩张和真正减少之间徘徊","authors":"Janja Hojnik","doi":"10.18690/LEXONOMICA.10.2.67-102.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article outlines some of the ambiguities arising from the endeavours of the EU Court to offer the national courts sufficiently clear interpretation of EU rules on free movement of services in respect of various national restrictions of online gambling that would enable them to make rulings in increasingly high numbers of cases in which foreign providers are restricted from accessing markets of EU Member States. It is submitted that this casuistic approach by the Court should not be considered as satisfying and that harmonising instruments should be adopted by the EU legislators, instead. Yet however, this is less realistic than ever before, as the Commission in situation of a total lack of the Member States« consensus stepped away from its efforts to pave the way to at least minimum standards of gambling offerings and provision of customers« protection, leaving it further to the EU and national courts to balance between controlled expansion and genuine diminution of gambling opportunities so as to weigh between free movement of services and opposing legitimate aims of the Member States. Spletne igre na sreco po pravu EU: vijuganje med nadzorovanim sirjenjem in pristnim omejevanjem priložnosti za igranje na sreco Clanek izpostavlja nekatere nejasnosti, ki izhajajo iz prizadevanj Sodisca EU, da nacionalnim sodiscem ponudi dovolj jasno razlago pravil EU o prostem pretoku storitev v povezavi z razlicnimi nacionalnimi omejitvami spletnega igranja na sreco, kar naj jim omogoci odlocanje v vse vecjem stevilu zadev, v katerih so tuji prireditelji iger na sreco omejevani pri dostopanju na trg držav clanic EU. Avtorica izpostavlja, da kazuisticni pristop Sodisca ne bi smel veljati kot zadovoljujoc in da bi bilo namesto tega potrebno sprejeti harmonizacijski akt na ravni EU. Vendar pa je to danes manj verjetno kot kadarkoli prej, saj je Komisija v razmerah zelo raznolikih interesov držav clanic odstopila od pobud za postavitev tudi minimalnih standardov prirejanja iger na sreco v EU ter varovanja potrosnikov, ki igrajo na sreco, s cimer se naprej prepusca Sodiscu EU in nacionalnim sodiscem nalogo, da postavljajo ravnotežje med nadzorovanim sirjenjem in pristnim omejevanjem iger na sreco, s cimer bodo tudi vzpostavljala ravnotežje med prostim pretokom storitev in nasprotujocim zakonitim ciljem držav clanic.","PeriodicalId":40392,"journal":{"name":"Lexonomica","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Gambling under EU Law: Strolling Between Controlled Expansion and Genuine Diminution of Gambling Opportunities\",\"authors\":\"Janja Hojnik\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/LEXONOMICA.10.2.67-102.2018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article outlines some of the ambiguities arising from the endeavours of the EU Court to offer the national courts sufficiently clear interpretation of EU rules on free movement of services in respect of various national restrictions of online gambling that would enable them to make rulings in increasingly high numbers of cases in which foreign providers are restricted from accessing markets of EU Member States. It is submitted that this casuistic approach by the Court should not be considered as satisfying and that harmonising instruments should be adopted by the EU legislators, instead. Yet however, this is less realistic than ever before, as the Commission in situation of a total lack of the Member States« consensus stepped away from its efforts to pave the way to at least minimum standards of gambling offerings and provision of customers« protection, leaving it further to the EU and national courts to balance between controlled expansion and genuine diminution of gambling opportunities so as to weigh between free movement of services and opposing legitimate aims of the Member States. Spletne igre na sreco po pravu EU: vijuganje med nadzorovanim sirjenjem in pristnim omejevanjem priložnosti za igranje na sreco Clanek izpostavlja nekatere nejasnosti, ki izhajajo iz prizadevanj Sodisca EU, da nacionalnim sodiscem ponudi dovolj jasno razlago pravil EU o prostem pretoku storitev v povezavi z razlicnimi nacionalnimi omejitvami spletnega igranja na sreco, kar naj jim omogoci odlocanje v vse vecjem stevilu zadev, v katerih so tuji prireditelji iger na sreco omejevani pri dostopanju na trg držav clanic EU. Avtorica izpostavlja, da kazuisticni pristop Sodisca ne bi smel veljati kot zadovoljujoc in da bi bilo namesto tega potrebno sprejeti harmonizacijski akt na ravni EU. Vendar pa je to danes manj verjetno kot kadarkoli prej, saj je Komisija v razmerah zelo raznolikih interesov držav clanic odstopila od pobud za postavitev tudi minimalnih standardov prirejanja iger na sreco v EU ter varovanja potrosnikov, ki igrajo na sreco, s cimer se naprej prepusca Sodiscu EU in nacionalnim sodiscem nalogo, da postavljajo ravnotežje med nadzorovanim sirjenjem in pristnim omejevanjem iger na sreco, s cimer bodo tudi vzpostavljala ravnotežje med prostim pretokom storitev in nasprotujocim zakonitim ciljem držav clanic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lexonomica\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lexonomica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/LEXONOMICA.10.2.67-102.2018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lexonomica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/LEXONOMICA.10.2.67-102.2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文概述了欧盟法院努力向各国法院提供欧盟关于服务自由流动的规则的充分明确解释所产生的一些含糊之处,这些规则涉及各国对在线赌博的限制,这将使他们能够在越来越多的外国提供商被限制进入欧盟成员国市场的案件中做出裁决。有人提出,法院这种诡辩的做法不应被认为令人满意,欧盟立法者应采用协调文书。然而,这比以往任何时候都不太现实,因为委员会在完全缺乏成员国共识的情况下,放弃了为至少达到最低赌博产品标准和提供客户保护铺平道路的努力。让欧盟和各国法院进一步在控制扩张和真正减少赌博机会之间取得平衡,以便在服务的自由流动和反对成员国的合法目标之间进行权衡。辉煌的辉煌,辉煌的辉煌,辉煌的辉煌。vijuganje med nadzorovanim sijenjem in priprim omejevanjem priložnosti za igranje na sreco clarek izpostavlja nekatere nejasnosti, ki izhajajo iz prizadevanj Sodisca EU, da nacalnim sodism ponudi dovolj jasno razlago pravil EU系统pretoku storitev v povezavi z razlicnimi nacalnii omejitvami spletnega igranja na sreco, kar najjimomogoci odlocanje v vse vecjem stevilu zadev, v katrih so tuji priredititel gier na sreco omejevani i dostopanju na trg držav cliniic EU。Avtorica izpostavlja, da kazuisticni pristop Sodisca ne bi嗅觉veljati kot zadovoljujoc在da bibi10亿的名称为tega potrebno sprejeti harmonizacijski akna ravni EU。venar pa je to danes manj verjetno kot kadarkoli prej, saj je Komisija v razmerah zelo raznolikih interesov držav临床诊断诊断诊断popotronikov, ki igrajo na sreco, s cimer se naprej prepusca Sodiscu EU in国家诊断诊断noloniko, da postavljajo ravnotežje med and zorovanim sirjenjem in pristnim omejevanjem erniko,S cimer bodo tudi vzpostavljala ravnotežje med prostim pretokom故事在nasprotujom zakonitim ciljem držav临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online Gambling under EU Law: Strolling Between Controlled Expansion and Genuine Diminution of Gambling Opportunities
This article outlines some of the ambiguities arising from the endeavours of the EU Court to offer the national courts sufficiently clear interpretation of EU rules on free movement of services in respect of various national restrictions of online gambling that would enable them to make rulings in increasingly high numbers of cases in which foreign providers are restricted from accessing markets of EU Member States. It is submitted that this casuistic approach by the Court should not be considered as satisfying and that harmonising instruments should be adopted by the EU legislators, instead. Yet however, this is less realistic than ever before, as the Commission in situation of a total lack of the Member States« consensus stepped away from its efforts to pave the way to at least minimum standards of gambling offerings and provision of customers« protection, leaving it further to the EU and national courts to balance between controlled expansion and genuine diminution of gambling opportunities so as to weigh between free movement of services and opposing legitimate aims of the Member States. Spletne igre na sreco po pravu EU: vijuganje med nadzorovanim sirjenjem in pristnim omejevanjem priložnosti za igranje na sreco Clanek izpostavlja nekatere nejasnosti, ki izhajajo iz prizadevanj Sodisca EU, da nacionalnim sodiscem ponudi dovolj jasno razlago pravil EU o prostem pretoku storitev v povezavi z razlicnimi nacionalnimi omejitvami spletnega igranja na sreco, kar naj jim omogoci odlocanje v vse vecjem stevilu zadev, v katerih so tuji prireditelji iger na sreco omejevani pri dostopanju na trg držav clanic EU. Avtorica izpostavlja, da kazuisticni pristop Sodisca ne bi smel veljati kot zadovoljujoc in da bi bilo namesto tega potrebno sprejeti harmonizacijski akt na ravni EU. Vendar pa je to danes manj verjetno kot kadarkoli prej, saj je Komisija v razmerah zelo raznolikih interesov držav clanic odstopila od pobud za postavitev tudi minimalnih standardov prirejanja iger na sreco v EU ter varovanja potrosnikov, ki igrajo na sreco, s cimer se naprej prepusca Sodiscu EU in nacionalnim sodiscem nalogo, da postavljajo ravnotežje med nadzorovanim sirjenjem in pristnim omejevanjem iger na sreco, s cimer bodo tudi vzpostavljala ravnotežje med prostim pretokom storitev in nasprotujocim zakonitim ciljem držav clanic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lexonomica
Lexonomica LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信