腐败案件中的司法社会学大精准问题

S. Sunaryo, Shinta Ayu Purnamawati, Haris Thofly
{"title":"腐败案件中的司法社会学大精准问题","authors":"S. Sunaryo, Shinta Ayu Purnamawati, Haris Thofly","doi":"10.29138/scj.v2i1.688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of juridical the award judge number: 56 / Pid / 2010 / PT.SBY, has not followed the legal formal in KUHAP as article; 183, 184, 185,186, 187, 191, 192, 194, 195, 196, 197, 199, 200, 202. The award the judge also could not prove a whole elements of a mistake. Judge only prove a small portion of element of the mistakes made by the defendant. The problem of sociological the award judge number: 56 / Pid / 2010 / PT.SBY, not capable of being description assurance of fairness and expediency. The award judge only description a form of unprofessional judge cutting off. The award judge only prove mistrust construction think of judge in understanding the iniquity of the defendant, therefore the award the judge was not salutary.","PeriodicalId":32386,"journal":{"name":"The Spirit of Society Journal International Journal of Society Development and Engagement","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problem Of Great Precision Juridical And Sociological In Corruption Case\",\"authors\":\"S. Sunaryo, Shinta Ayu Purnamawati, Haris Thofly\",\"doi\":\"10.29138/scj.v2i1.688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of juridical the award judge number: 56 / Pid / 2010 / PT.SBY, has not followed the legal formal in KUHAP as article; 183, 184, 185,186, 187, 191, 192, 194, 195, 196, 197, 199, 200, 202. The award the judge also could not prove a whole elements of a mistake. Judge only prove a small portion of element of the mistakes made by the defendant. The problem of sociological the award judge number: 56 / Pid / 2010 / PT.SBY, not capable of being description assurance of fairness and expediency. The award judge only description a form of unprofessional judge cutting off. The award judge only prove mistrust construction think of judge in understanding the iniquity of the defendant, therefore the award the judge was not salutary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Spirit of Society Journal International Journal of Society Development and Engagement\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Spirit of Society Journal International Journal of Society Development and Engagement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29138/scj.v2i1.688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Spirit of Society Journal International Journal of Society Development and Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29138/scj.v2i1.688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

司法上的问题裁判号:56 / Pid / 2010 / PT.SBY,没有按照法律正式在KUHAP作为文章;183、184、185,186、187、191、192、194、195、196、197、199、200、202。该判决书的法官也无法证明有一个完整的错误要素。法官只证明了被告所犯错误的一小部分。问题社会学的评奖评委编号:56 / Pid / 2010 / PT.SBY,不能作为描述公平和权宜之计的保证。评奖评委只描述一种形式的非专业评委的切断。判决书的判决书只证明了法官在理解被告的不法行为时的不信任感,因此判决书的判决书对法官是无益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Problem Of Great Precision Juridical And Sociological In Corruption Case
The problem of juridical the award judge number: 56 / Pid / 2010 / PT.SBY, has not followed the legal formal in KUHAP as article; 183, 184, 185,186, 187, 191, 192, 194, 195, 196, 197, 199, 200, 202. The award the judge also could not prove a whole elements of a mistake. Judge only prove a small portion of element of the mistakes made by the defendant. The problem of sociological the award judge number: 56 / Pid / 2010 / PT.SBY, not capable of being description assurance of fairness and expediency. The award judge only description a form of unprofessional judge cutting off. The award judge only prove mistrust construction think of judge in understanding the iniquity of the defendant, therefore the award the judge was not salutary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信