孔子与苏格拉底的不同知识形象与教育学视角

Complicity-An International Journal of Complexity and Education Pub Date : 2012-02-26 DOI:10.29173/CMPLCT16535

Zhong Jian-wei

{"title":"孔子与苏格拉底的不同知识形象与教育学视角","authors":"Zhong Jian-wei","doi":"10.29173/CMPLCT16535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Confucius and Socrates, two cultural icons of the East and West, both declared they did “not know,” which, however, held different concepts for them. First, I will critically examine their dialogue teaching practices to analyze the implications of “knowing\" and “not knowing.” Second, I will explore the different images of knowledge and visions of pedagogy each held.","PeriodicalId":43228,"journal":{"name":"Complicity-An International Journal of Complexity and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Images of Knowledge and Perspectives of Pedagogy in Confucius and Socrates\",\"authors\":\"Zhong Jian-wei\",\"doi\":\"10.29173/CMPLCT16535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Confucius and Socrates, two cultural icons of the East and West, both declared they did “not know,” which, however, held different concepts for them. First, I will critically examine their dialogue teaching practices to analyze the implications of “knowing\\\" and “not knowing.” Second, I will explore the different images of knowledge and visions of pedagogy each held.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complicity-An International Journal of Complexity and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complicity-An International Journal of Complexity and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29173/CMPLCT16535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complicity-An International Journal of Complexity and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/CMPLCT16535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

东方和西方的文化偶像孔子和苏格拉底都宣称自己“不知道”，但这对他们来说是不同的概念。首先，我将批判性地考察他们的对话教学实践，以分析“知道”和“不知道”的含义。其次，我将探讨各自持有的不同的知识形象和教育学愿景。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Different Images of Knowledge and Perspectives of Pedagogy in Confucius and Socrates

Confucius and Socrates, two cultural icons of the East and West, both declared they did “not know,” which, however, held different concepts for them. First, I will critically examine their dialogue teaching practices to analyze the implications of “knowing" and “not knowing.” Second, I will explore the different images of knowledge and visions of pedagogy each held.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Complicity-An International Journal of Complexity and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

自引率

0.00%

发文量