互联网服务提供者对用户版权侵权的责任、企业责任与第一修正案

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Alfred C. Yen
{"title":"互联网服务提供者对用户版权侵权的责任、企业责任与第一修正案","authors":"Alfred C. Yen","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.236478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet offers the fastest reproduction and distribution of information ever known, presenting fundamental challenges to copyright law. Practically anyone with a personal computer can receive and send information over the Internet, and so practically anyone has access to copyrighted works and can duplicate them, adapt them, or disseminate them. From the perspective of a copyright holder, even a single innocent use represents a threat. This Article examines the controversial proposal that Internet Service Providers (\"ISPs\") be held liable for the copyright infringements of the subscribers. The Article takes the position that the existing case law considering ISP liability for subscriber copyright infringement - under theories of direct liability, vicarious liability, and contributory liability - thus far has struck an acceptable balance between the property interests of copyright holders and the First Amendment rights of subscribers. The Article supports this contention with an examination of the rationales underlying the closely analogous field of enterprise liability in tort. It then examines recent Congressional legislation - the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (\"DMCA\") - providing \"safe harbors\" for ISP liability. The Article concludes that the DMCA, unless properly interpreted, threatens to upset the balance struck by the case law by creating an incentive to unduly restrict the free speech of subscribers.","PeriodicalId":47702,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Law Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internet Service Provider Liability for Subscriber Copyright Infringement, Enterprise Liability, and the First Amendment\",\"authors\":\"Alfred C. Yen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.236478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Internet offers the fastest reproduction and distribution of information ever known, presenting fundamental challenges to copyright law. Practically anyone with a personal computer can receive and send information over the Internet, and so practically anyone has access to copyrighted works and can duplicate them, adapt them, or disseminate them. From the perspective of a copyright holder, even a single innocent use represents a threat. This Article examines the controversial proposal that Internet Service Providers (\\\"ISPs\\\") be held liable for the copyright infringements of the subscribers. The Article takes the position that the existing case law considering ISP liability for subscriber copyright infringement - under theories of direct liability, vicarious liability, and contributory liability - thus far has struck an acceptable balance between the property interests of copyright holders and the First Amendment rights of subscribers. The Article supports this contention with an examination of the rationales underlying the closely analogous field of enterprise liability in tort. It then examines recent Congressional legislation - the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (\\\"DMCA\\\") - providing \\\"safe harbors\\\" for ISP liability. The Article concludes that the DMCA, unless properly interpreted, threatens to upset the balance struck by the case law by creating an incentive to unduly restrict the free speech of subscribers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.236478\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.236478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

互联网提供了前所未有的最快的信息复制和传播,对版权法提出了根本性的挑战。几乎任何拥有个人电脑的人都可以通过因特网接收和发送信息,因此几乎任何人都可以接触到受版权保护的作品,并可以复制、改编或传播它们。从版权所有者的角度来看,即使是一次无辜的使用也构成了威胁。本文探讨了有争议的建议,即互联网服务提供商(“isp”)对用户的版权侵权负责。本文的立场是,现行判例法考虑ISP对用户版权侵权的责任——根据直接责任、替代责任和分担责任的理论——迄今为止已经在版权所有者的财产利益和用户的第一修正案权利之间取得了可接受的平衡。本文通过考察企业侵权责任的基本原理来支持这一论点。然后,它检查了最近的国会立法-数字千年版权法案(“DMCA”)-为互联网服务提供商的责任提供了“安全港”。文章的结论是,除非对DMCA进行适当的解释,否则它可能会破坏判例法所保持的平衡,因为它会刺激用户过度限制言论自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internet Service Provider Liability for Subscriber Copyright Infringement, Enterprise Liability, and the First Amendment
The Internet offers the fastest reproduction and distribution of information ever known, presenting fundamental challenges to copyright law. Practically anyone with a personal computer can receive and send information over the Internet, and so practically anyone has access to copyrighted works and can duplicate them, adapt them, or disseminate them. From the perspective of a copyright holder, even a single innocent use represents a threat. This Article examines the controversial proposal that Internet Service Providers ("ISPs") be held liable for the copyright infringements of the subscribers. The Article takes the position that the existing case law considering ISP liability for subscriber copyright infringement - under theories of direct liability, vicarious liability, and contributory liability - thus far has struck an acceptable balance between the property interests of copyright holders and the First Amendment rights of subscribers. The Article supports this contention with an examination of the rationales underlying the closely analogous field of enterprise liability in tort. It then examines recent Congressional legislation - the Digital Millenium Copyright Act ("DMCA") - providing "safe harbors" for ISP liability. The Article concludes that the DMCA, unless properly interpreted, threatens to upset the balance struck by the case law by creating an incentive to unduly restrict the free speech of subscribers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Georgetown Law Journal is headquartered at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, D.C. and has since its inception published more than 500 issues, as well as the widely-used Annual Review of Criminal Procedure (ARCP). The Journal is currently, and always has been, run by law students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信