普京意识形态的根基:一个非文明政权的文明起源

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Ivan Grek
{"title":"普京意识形态的根基:一个非文明政权的文明起源","authors":"Ivan Grek","doi":"10.1080/21599165.2023.2164849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article attempts to explore three illiberal discursive practices (metaphysical state, right post-colonialism, and Orthodox pan-Slavism) that structure Putin's ideological course and help to understand why justifications of Russia's invasion of Ukraine sound logical in Russian discourse. It argues that throughout the 1990s illiberal grassroots organizations popularized these discursive practices of the Soviet right-wing intelligentsia, engaged large masses in their projects, recruited members of Putin's elites as followers, and were partially absorbed by the administration. My interviews with the representatives of the illiberal civic movement and Putin’s administration indicate that grassroots organizations successfully delivered their ideological modus operandi to the post-Yeltsin ruling class. Hence, an acute resemblance of the illiberal grassroots movement’s discursive practices with those of the Kremlin is hardly likely to be accidental. Putin and his allies engaged with this preexisting illiberal civil society and ultimately drew on its ideas and tapped into its networks for support.","PeriodicalId":46570,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics","volume":"36 1","pages":"220 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The grassroots of Putin’s ideology: civil origins of an uncivil regime\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Grek\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21599165.2023.2164849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article attempts to explore three illiberal discursive practices (metaphysical state, right post-colonialism, and Orthodox pan-Slavism) that structure Putin's ideological course and help to understand why justifications of Russia's invasion of Ukraine sound logical in Russian discourse. It argues that throughout the 1990s illiberal grassroots organizations popularized these discursive practices of the Soviet right-wing intelligentsia, engaged large masses in their projects, recruited members of Putin's elites as followers, and were partially absorbed by the administration. My interviews with the representatives of the illiberal civic movement and Putin’s administration indicate that grassroots organizations successfully delivered their ideological modus operandi to the post-Yeltsin ruling class. Hence, an acute resemblance of the illiberal grassroots movement’s discursive practices with those of the Kremlin is hardly likely to be accidental. Putin and his allies engaged with this preexisting illiberal civil society and ultimately drew on its ideas and tapped into its networks for support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East European Politics\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"220 - 239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East European Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2023.2164849\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2023.2164849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图探讨构成普京意识形态进程的三种非自由主义话语实践(形而上学国家、右翼后殖民主义和正统泛斯拉夫主义),并有助于理解为什么俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的理由在俄罗斯话语中听起来合乎逻辑。它认为,在整个20世纪90年代,非自由主义的基层组织普及了苏联右翼知识分子的这些话语实践,让大量群众参与到他们的项目中,招募普京的精英成员作为追随者,并部分被政府吸收。我对非自由主义公民运动和普京政府代表的采访表明,草根组织成功地将他们的意识形态运作模式传递给了后叶利钦统治阶级。因此,不自由的草根运动的话语实践与克里姆林宫的话语实践极其相似,这不可能是偶然的。普京和他的盟友与这个先前存在的不自由的公民社会接触,最终汲取了它的思想,并利用了它的网络来获得支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The grassroots of Putin’s ideology: civil origins of an uncivil regime
ABSTRACT This article attempts to explore three illiberal discursive practices (metaphysical state, right post-colonialism, and Orthodox pan-Slavism) that structure Putin's ideological course and help to understand why justifications of Russia's invasion of Ukraine sound logical in Russian discourse. It argues that throughout the 1990s illiberal grassroots organizations popularized these discursive practices of the Soviet right-wing intelligentsia, engaged large masses in their projects, recruited members of Putin's elites as followers, and were partially absorbed by the administration. My interviews with the representatives of the illiberal civic movement and Putin’s administration indicate that grassroots organizations successfully delivered their ideological modus operandi to the post-Yeltsin ruling class. Hence, an acute resemblance of the illiberal grassroots movement’s discursive practices with those of the Kremlin is hardly likely to be accidental. Putin and his allies engaged with this preexisting illiberal civil society and ultimately drew on its ideas and tapped into its networks for support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
East European Politics
East European Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.40%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信