重症监护病房住院医师对胸腔积液和胸腔小引流管插入的评估:一项观察性研究

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
L. Vetrugno, G. M. Guadagnin, F. Barbariol, Stefano D’Incà’, S. Delrio, D. Orso, R. Girometti, G. Volpicelli, T. Bove
{"title":"重症监护病房住院医师对胸腔积液和胸腔小引流管插入的评估:一项观察性研究","authors":"L. Vetrugno, G. M. Guadagnin, F. Barbariol, Stefano D’Incà’, S. Delrio, D. Orso, R. Girometti, G. Volpicelli, T. Bove","doi":"10.1177/1179548419871527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small-bore pleural drainage device insertion has become a first-line therapy for the treatment of pleural effusions (PLEFF) in the intensive care unit; however, no data are available regarding the performance of resident doctors in the execution of this procedure. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of complications related to ultrasound-guided percutaneous small-bore pleural drain insertion by resident doctors. In this single-center observational study, the primary outcome was the occurrence of complications. Secondary outcomes studied were as follows: estimation of PLEFF size by ultrasound and postprocedure changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio. In all, 87 pleural drains were inserted in 88 attempts. Of these, 16 were positioned by the senior intensivist following a failed attempt by the resident, giving a total of 71 successful placements performed by residents. In 13 cases (14.8%), difficulties were encountered in advancing the catheter over the guidewire. In 16 cases (18.4%), the drain was positioned by a senior intensivist after a failed attempt by a resident. In 8 cases (9.2%), the final chest X-ray revealed a kink in the catheter. A pneumothorax was identified in 21.8% of cases with a mean size (±SD) of just 10 mm (±6; maximum size: 20 mm). The mean size of PLEFF was 57.4 mm (±19.9), corresponding to 1148 mL (±430) according to Balik’s formula. Ultrasound-guided placement of a small-bore pleural drain by resident doctors is a safe procedure, although it is associated with a rather high incidence of irrelevant pneumothoraces.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Pleural Effusion and Small Pleural Drain Insertion by Resident Doctors in an Intensive Care Unit: An Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"L. Vetrugno, G. M. Guadagnin, F. Barbariol, Stefano D’Incà’, S. Delrio, D. Orso, R. Girometti, G. Volpicelli, T. Bove\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179548419871527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Small-bore pleural drainage device insertion has become a first-line therapy for the treatment of pleural effusions (PLEFF) in the intensive care unit; however, no data are available regarding the performance of resident doctors in the execution of this procedure. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of complications related to ultrasound-guided percutaneous small-bore pleural drain insertion by resident doctors. In this single-center observational study, the primary outcome was the occurrence of complications. Secondary outcomes studied were as follows: estimation of PLEFF size by ultrasound and postprocedure changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio. In all, 87 pleural drains were inserted in 88 attempts. Of these, 16 were positioned by the senior intensivist following a failed attempt by the resident, giving a total of 71 successful placements performed by residents. In 13 cases (14.8%), difficulties were encountered in advancing the catheter over the guidewire. In 16 cases (18.4%), the drain was positioned by a senior intensivist after a failed attempt by a resident. In 8 cases (9.2%), the final chest X-ray revealed a kink in the catheter. A pneumothorax was identified in 21.8% of cases with a mean size (±SD) of just 10 mm (±6; maximum size: 20 mm). The mean size of PLEFF was 57.4 mm (±19.9), corresponding to 1148 mL (±430) according to Balik’s formula. Ultrasound-guided placement of a small-bore pleural drain by resident doctors is a safe procedure, although it is associated with a rather high incidence of irrelevant pneumothoraces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548419871527\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548419871527","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

小口径胸腔引流装置插入已成为重症监护室治疗胸腔积液(PLEFF)的一线疗法;然而,没有关于住院医生在执行这一程序中的表现的数据。我们的目的是评估住院医师超声引导下经皮小口径胸腔引流术相关并发症的发生率。在这项单中心观察性研究中,主要结局是并发症的发生。研究的次要结果如下:超声估计PLEFF大小和术后PaO2/FiO2比值的变化。总共88次插入87条胸腔引流管。其中,16位是在住院医师尝试失败后由高级重症医师定位的,总共有71位住院医师成功完成了安置。13例(14.8%)患者在导丝上推进导管时遇到困难。16例(18.4%)住院医师尝试引流失败后,由高级重症医师定位引流管。其中8例(9.2%)胸部x线片显示导管扭结。21.8%的病例确诊为气胸,平均尺寸(±SD)仅为10 mm(±6;最大尺寸:20毫米)。PLEFF平均大小为57.4 mm(±19.9),按Balik公式计算为1148 mL(±430)。住院医生在超声引导下放置小口径胸腔引流管是一种安全的手术,尽管它与无关气胸的发生率相当高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Pleural Effusion and Small Pleural Drain Insertion by Resident Doctors in an Intensive Care Unit: An Observational Study
Small-bore pleural drainage device insertion has become a first-line therapy for the treatment of pleural effusions (PLEFF) in the intensive care unit; however, no data are available regarding the performance of resident doctors in the execution of this procedure. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of complications related to ultrasound-guided percutaneous small-bore pleural drain insertion by resident doctors. In this single-center observational study, the primary outcome was the occurrence of complications. Secondary outcomes studied were as follows: estimation of PLEFF size by ultrasound and postprocedure changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio. In all, 87 pleural drains were inserted in 88 attempts. Of these, 16 were positioned by the senior intensivist following a failed attempt by the resident, giving a total of 71 successful placements performed by residents. In 13 cases (14.8%), difficulties were encountered in advancing the catheter over the guidewire. In 16 cases (18.4%), the drain was positioned by a senior intensivist after a failed attempt by a resident. In 8 cases (9.2%), the final chest X-ray revealed a kink in the catheter. A pneumothorax was identified in 21.8% of cases with a mean size (±SD) of just 10 mm (±6; maximum size: 20 mm). The mean size of PLEFF was 57.4 mm (±19.9), corresponding to 1148 mL (±430) according to Balik’s formula. Ultrasound-guided placement of a small-bore pleural drain by resident doctors is a safe procedure, although it is associated with a rather high incidence of irrelevant pneumothoraces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信