溶剂家族和传统法律下的委托人

IF 0.3 4区社会学 Q2 HISTORY

Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review Pub Date : 2017-06-22 DOI:10.1163/15718190-08512P05

T. Finkenauer

{"title":"溶剂家族和传统法律下的委托人","authors":"T. Finkenauer","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08512P05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pactum ut minus solvatur and the maior pars in classical law.\u2029Marc Aurel established the institution of a creditors’ meeting, the purpose of which was to find a composition agreement between all creditors and the debtor’s heir. Such a debt cut required a majority decision of those creditors present at the meeting. Without discretion, the praetor had to follow this majority decision. His decretum and thus the quota agreed upon were binding even for dissenting creditors and those not present at the meeting.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"115-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Das pactum ut minus solvatur und die maior pars im klassischen Recht\",\"authors\":\"T. Finkenauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718190-08512P05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pactum ut minus solvatur and the maior pars in classical law.\\u2029Marc Aurel established the institution of a creditors’ meeting, the purpose of which was to find a composition agreement between all creditors and the debtor’s heir. Such a debt cut required a majority decision of those creditors present at the meeting. Without discretion, the praetor had to follow this majority decision. His decretum and thus the quota agreed upon were binding even for dissenting creditors and those not present at the meeting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"115-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08512P05\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08512P05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

契约、负溶剂性和古典法中的主要部分。 Marc Aurel建立了债权人会议的制度，其目的是在所有债权人和债务人的继承人之间达成和解协议。这样的债务削减需要出席会议的债权人的多数同意。没有自由裁量权，执政官必须遵循多数人的决定。他的命令以及由此达成的配额，即使对持不同意见的债权人和未出席会议的债权人也具有约束力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Das pactum ut minus solvatur und die maior pars im klassischen Recht

The pactum ut minus solvatur and the maior pars in classical law. Marc Aurel established the institution of a creditors’ meeting, the purpose of which was to find a composition agreement between all creditors and the debtor’s heir. Such a debt cut required a majority decision of those creditors present at the meeting. Without discretion, the praetor had to follow this majority decision. His decretum and thus the quota agreed upon were binding even for dissenting creditors and those not present at the meeting.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review Multiple-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Legal History Review, inspired by E.M. Meijers, is a peer-reviewed journal and was founded in 1918 by a number of Dutch jurists, who set out to stimulate scholarly interest in legal history in their own country and also to provide a centre for international cooperation in the subject. This has gradually through the years been achieved. The Review had already become one of the leading internationally known periodicals in the field before 1940. Since 1950 when it emerged under Belgo-Dutch editorship its position strengthened. Much attention is paid not only to the common foundations of the western legal tradition but also to the special, frequently divergent development of national law in the various countries belonging to, or influenced by it.