心肌收缩分数优于射血分数预测心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者的功能容量

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yasser A. Abdellatif, Hassan A Addow, R. R. Elias
{"title":"心肌收缩分数优于射血分数预测心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者的功能容量","authors":"Yasser A. Abdellatif, Hassan A Addow, R. R. Elias","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE)-determined myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) and functional capacity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. The MCF is a volumetric index of myocardial function, defined as stroke volume ratio to myocardial volume (MV). Functional capacity was evaluated by a 6-min walk test (6MWT), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). In view of cardiac remodeling, we hypothesized that MCF would be superior to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting functional capacity in HFrEF patients. Methods The study was conducted on thirty HFrEF patients with an LVEF of no more than 40% with NYHA functional class I–III. Each patient performed, on the same day, the MLHFQ, 6MWT (to calculate the 6-min walk distance “6MWD”), and an ECG gated echocardiographic study including 3DE-determined MCF. MV was calculated as 3DE determined LV mass divided by the specific gravity of the myocardium. Results Our results showed that MCF is inversely correlated with the Minnesota score (r 0.6, p < 0.001) and positively correlated with 6MWD (r 0.65, p < 0.001). However, no significant relationship existed between LVEF and MLHFQ score or 6MWD. In a multivariate model, MCF was shown to be an independent echocardiographic predictor (besides pulmonary artery systolic pressure) of 6MWD; however, LVEF failed to offer such potential. Conclusion Among various echocardiographic parameters, MCF can be considered a volumetric index superior to LVEF in predicting functional capacity in HFrEF patients.","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"66 1","pages":"15 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myocardial Contraction Fraction is Superior to Ejection Fraction in Predicting Functional Capacity in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction\",\"authors\":\"Yasser A. Abdellatif, Hassan A Addow, R. R. Elias\",\"doi\":\"10.37616/2212-5043.1295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE)-determined myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) and functional capacity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. The MCF is a volumetric index of myocardial function, defined as stroke volume ratio to myocardial volume (MV). Functional capacity was evaluated by a 6-min walk test (6MWT), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). In view of cardiac remodeling, we hypothesized that MCF would be superior to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting functional capacity in HFrEF patients. Methods The study was conducted on thirty HFrEF patients with an LVEF of no more than 40% with NYHA functional class I–III. Each patient performed, on the same day, the MLHFQ, 6MWT (to calculate the 6-min walk distance “6MWD”), and an ECG gated echocardiographic study including 3DE-determined MCF. MV was calculated as 3DE determined LV mass divided by the specific gravity of the myocardium. Results Our results showed that MCF is inversely correlated with the Minnesota score (r 0.6, p < 0.001) and positively correlated with 6MWD (r 0.65, p < 0.001). However, no significant relationship existed between LVEF and MLHFQ score or 6MWD. In a multivariate model, MCF was shown to be an independent echocardiographic predictor (besides pulmonary artery systolic pressure) of 6MWD; however, LVEF failed to offer such potential. Conclusion Among various echocardiographic parameters, MCF can be considered a volumetric index superior to LVEF in predicting functional capacity in HFrEF patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"15 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的在本研究中,我们旨在评估三维超声心动图(3DE)测定心肌收缩分数(MCF)与心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者功能容量的关系。MCF是心肌功能的容积指标,定义为脑卒中容积与心肌容积之比(MV)。通过6分钟步行测试(6MWT)评估功能能力,通过明尼苏达州心力衰竭患者生活问卷(MLHFQ)评估健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。鉴于心脏重构,我们假设MCF在预测HFrEF患者的功能容量方面优于左室射血分数(LVEF)。方法选取30例LVEF不大于40%,NYHA功能分级为I-III级的HFrEF患者。每位患者在同一天进行MLHFQ、6MWT(用于计算6分钟步行距离“6MWD”)和心电图门控超声心动图研究,包括3de测定的MCF。MV计算为3DE测定的左室质量除以心肌比重。结果MCF与明尼苏达得分呈负相关(r 0.6, p < 0.001),与6MWD呈正相关(r 0.65, p < 0.001)。而LVEF与MLHFQ评分、6MWD均无显著相关。在多变量模型中,MCF被证明是6MWD的独立超声心动图预测因子(除肺动脉收缩压外);然而,LVEF未能提供这种潜力。结论在各种超声心动图参数中,MCF作为预测HFrEF患者功能容量的容量指标优于LVEF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Myocardial Contraction Fraction is Superior to Ejection Fraction in Predicting Functional Capacity in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction
Objectives In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE)-determined myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) and functional capacity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. The MCF is a volumetric index of myocardial function, defined as stroke volume ratio to myocardial volume (MV). Functional capacity was evaluated by a 6-min walk test (6MWT), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). In view of cardiac remodeling, we hypothesized that MCF would be superior to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting functional capacity in HFrEF patients. Methods The study was conducted on thirty HFrEF patients with an LVEF of no more than 40% with NYHA functional class I–III. Each patient performed, on the same day, the MLHFQ, 6MWT (to calculate the 6-min walk distance “6MWD”), and an ECG gated echocardiographic study including 3DE-determined MCF. MV was calculated as 3DE determined LV mass divided by the specific gravity of the myocardium. Results Our results showed that MCF is inversely correlated with the Minnesota score (r 0.6, p < 0.001) and positively correlated with 6MWD (r 0.65, p < 0.001). However, no significant relationship existed between LVEF and MLHFQ score or 6MWD. In a multivariate model, MCF was shown to be an independent echocardiographic predictor (besides pulmonary artery systolic pressure) of 6MWD; however, LVEF failed to offer such potential. Conclusion Among various echocardiographic parameters, MCF can be considered a volumetric index superior to LVEF in predicting functional capacity in HFrEF patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信