SAB在其他健康人群行腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的安全性和可行性

M. Begum, Md Abdul Baki, Kawser Ahmed, Nirmal Kumar Barman, Md. Monwar Hossein, Md Shafiqul Islam, Shiladitya Shil
{"title":"SAB在其他健康人群行腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的安全性和可行性","authors":"M. Begum, Md Abdul Baki, Kawser Ahmed, Nirmal Kumar Barman, Md. Monwar Hossein, Md Shafiqul Islam, Shiladitya Shil","doi":"10.36348/sjmps.2023.v09i08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The safety and feasibility of utilizing SAB as the sole anesthetic technique in otherwise healthy individuals undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been increasingly recognized. SAB offers potential advantages in terms of reduced complications, improved pain control, and avoidance of general anesthesia-related risks. Objective: To assess safety and feasibility of SAB in otherwise healthy individuals undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Method: The study included a cohort of 40 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy and met specific inclusion criteria. All patients received a subarachnoid block (SAB) with 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 25 micrograms of fentanyl at the L2-L3 level. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure was performed using a standard 4-port technique, while maintaining a low intra-abdominal pressure of 9-10 mm Hg through CO2 pneumoperitoneum. The patients were followed up at various time points, including 30 minutes, 4 hours, the time of discharge, and on the 7th day after the operation. Any voluntary or involuntary movements or exaggerated diaphragmatic excursions during the operation were carefully monitored. The study recorded parameters such as operation time, duration of operating room occupancy, length of hospital stay, post-operative pain levels, analgesic requirements, occurrences of nausea, vomiting, headache, right shoulder pain, wound-related complications, and patient satisfaction. Results: SAB demonstrated efficacy in all 40 patients undergoing surgery. Conversion to general anesthesia was required in two cases due to persisting low oxygen saturation. Hypotension occurred in 23.7% of patients, while 10.5% experienced right shoulder pain. The average operating time was 37.3 minutes, ranging from 21 to 77 minutes. Awkward movements and exaggerated respiratory excursions were observed in 23.7% and 18.4% of cases, respectively. Only two cases required conversion to general anesthesia. The mean hospital stay duration was 29.3 hours. No major complications were reported during the study. Conclusion: These findings suggest that SAB can be successfully and effectively used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in healthy patients, providing a safe alternative to general anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":21367,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Feasibility of SAB in Otherwise Healthy Individuals Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy\",\"authors\":\"M. Begum, Md Abdul Baki, Kawser Ahmed, Nirmal Kumar Barman, Md. Monwar Hossein, Md Shafiqul Islam, Shiladitya Shil\",\"doi\":\"10.36348/sjmps.2023.v09i08.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The safety and feasibility of utilizing SAB as the sole anesthetic technique in otherwise healthy individuals undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been increasingly recognized. SAB offers potential advantages in terms of reduced complications, improved pain control, and avoidance of general anesthesia-related risks. Objective: To assess safety and feasibility of SAB in otherwise healthy individuals undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Method: The study included a cohort of 40 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy and met specific inclusion criteria. All patients received a subarachnoid block (SAB) with 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 25 micrograms of fentanyl at the L2-L3 level. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure was performed using a standard 4-port technique, while maintaining a low intra-abdominal pressure of 9-10 mm Hg through CO2 pneumoperitoneum. The patients were followed up at various time points, including 30 minutes, 4 hours, the time of discharge, and on the 7th day after the operation. Any voluntary or involuntary movements or exaggerated diaphragmatic excursions during the operation were carefully monitored. The study recorded parameters such as operation time, duration of operating room occupancy, length of hospital stay, post-operative pain levels, analgesic requirements, occurrences of nausea, vomiting, headache, right shoulder pain, wound-related complications, and patient satisfaction. Results: SAB demonstrated efficacy in all 40 patients undergoing surgery. Conversion to general anesthesia was required in two cases due to persisting low oxygen saturation. Hypotension occurred in 23.7% of patients, while 10.5% experienced right shoulder pain. The average operating time was 37.3 minutes, ranging from 21 to 77 minutes. Awkward movements and exaggerated respiratory excursions were observed in 23.7% and 18.4% of cases, respectively. Only two cases required conversion to general anesthesia. The mean hospital stay duration was 29.3 hours. No major complications were reported during the study. Conclusion: These findings suggest that SAB can be successfully and effectively used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in healthy patients, providing a safe alternative to general anesthesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjmps.2023.v09i08.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjmps.2023.v09i08.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在健康的人行腹腔镜胆囊切除术时,SAB作为唯一麻醉技术的安全性和可行性已经得到越来越多的认可。SAB在减少并发症、改善疼痛控制和避免全身麻醉相关风险方面具有潜在的优势。目的:评价在其他健康人群行腹腔镜胆囊切除术时SAB的安全性和可行性。方法:该研究纳入了40例符合特定入选标准的择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者。所有患者均接受蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB),其中含有3ml 0.5%布比卡因和25微克L2-L3水平的芬太尼。腹腔镜胆囊切除术采用标准的四孔技术,同时通过CO2气腹维持9-10 mm Hg的低腹内压。分别于术后30分钟、4小时、出院时间及术后第7天对患者进行随访。在手术过程中,仔细监测任何自愿或非自愿的运动或夸张的膈肌漂移。该研究记录了手术时间、手术室占用时间、住院时间、术后疼痛程度、止痛需求、恶心、呕吐、头痛、右肩疼痛、伤口相关并发症和患者满意度等参数。结果:SAB对所有40例手术患者均有效。由于持续低血氧饱和度,2例患者需转全身麻醉。23.7%的患者出现低血压,10.5%的患者出现右肩疼痛。平均手术时间37.3分钟,21 ~ 77分钟不等。23.7%和18.4%的患者出现笨拙动作和夸张的呼吸漂移。只有两例需要转全身麻醉。平均住院时间为29.3小时。研究期间无重大并发症报告。结论:SAB可成功有效地用于健康患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术,为全身麻醉提供了一种安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Feasibility of SAB in Otherwise Healthy Individuals Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Background: The safety and feasibility of utilizing SAB as the sole anesthetic technique in otherwise healthy individuals undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been increasingly recognized. SAB offers potential advantages in terms of reduced complications, improved pain control, and avoidance of general anesthesia-related risks. Objective: To assess safety and feasibility of SAB in otherwise healthy individuals undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Method: The study included a cohort of 40 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy and met specific inclusion criteria. All patients received a subarachnoid block (SAB) with 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 25 micrograms of fentanyl at the L2-L3 level. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure was performed using a standard 4-port technique, while maintaining a low intra-abdominal pressure of 9-10 mm Hg through CO2 pneumoperitoneum. The patients were followed up at various time points, including 30 minutes, 4 hours, the time of discharge, and on the 7th day after the operation. Any voluntary or involuntary movements or exaggerated diaphragmatic excursions during the operation were carefully monitored. The study recorded parameters such as operation time, duration of operating room occupancy, length of hospital stay, post-operative pain levels, analgesic requirements, occurrences of nausea, vomiting, headache, right shoulder pain, wound-related complications, and patient satisfaction. Results: SAB demonstrated efficacy in all 40 patients undergoing surgery. Conversion to general anesthesia was required in two cases due to persisting low oxygen saturation. Hypotension occurred in 23.7% of patients, while 10.5% experienced right shoulder pain. The average operating time was 37.3 minutes, ranging from 21 to 77 minutes. Awkward movements and exaggerated respiratory excursions were observed in 23.7% and 18.4% of cases, respectively. Only two cases required conversion to general anesthesia. The mean hospital stay duration was 29.3 hours. No major complications were reported during the study. Conclusion: These findings suggest that SAB can be successfully and effectively used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in healthy patients, providing a safe alternative to general anesthesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信