膀胱保留方案治疗尿路上皮性膀胱癌的疗效

PAFMJ Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.5847
Sameed Hussain, A. S. Syed, Fouzia Abdus Samad
{"title":"膀胱保留方案治疗尿路上皮性膀胱癌的疗效","authors":"Sameed Hussain, A. S. Syed, Fouzia Abdus Samad","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.5847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore trimodality treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy as an alternative approach to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, for the treatment of non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder carcinoma. \nStudy Design: Retrospective observational study. \nPlace and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi Pakistan, from 2006 and 2015. \nMethodology: A total of 122 patients were evaluated in a retrospective manner. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Patients received four courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin as radiation sensitizer. \nResult: 5-year overall survival was 80 (66%) in this population and a complete response following completion of treatment was seen in 93 (76.3%) patients. Subset analysis showed markedly increased 5-year overall survival of around 104 (85%) in patients having complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. \nConclusion: The study concludes that bladder preservation is an acceptable alternative to radical cystectomy in selected population especially among those who had a complete response to the initial four courses of chemotherapy.","PeriodicalId":19982,"journal":{"name":"PAFMJ","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OUTCOME OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH BLADDER PRESERVATION PROTOCOL IN UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA OF URINARY BLADDER\",\"authors\":\"Sameed Hussain, A. S. Syed, Fouzia Abdus Samad\",\"doi\":\"10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.5847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To explore trimodality treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy as an alternative approach to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, for the treatment of non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder carcinoma. \\nStudy Design: Retrospective observational study. \\nPlace and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi Pakistan, from 2006 and 2015. \\nMethodology: A total of 122 patients were evaluated in a retrospective manner. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Patients received four courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin as radiation sensitizer. \\nResult: 5-year overall survival was 80 (66%) in this population and a complete response following completion of treatment was seen in 93 (76.3%) patients. Subset analysis showed markedly increased 5-year overall survival of around 104 (85%) in patients having complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. \\nConclusion: The study concludes that bladder preservation is an acceptable alternative to radical cystectomy in selected population especially among those who had a complete response to the initial four courses of chemotherapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PAFMJ\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PAFMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.5847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAFMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i6.5847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨新辅助化疗联合放化疗三位一体治疗非转移性肌性浸润性膀胱癌的方法,作为新辅助化疗联合根治性膀胱切除术的替代方案。研究设计:回顾性观察性研究。学习地点和时间:巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第联合军事医院,2006年至2015年。方法:采用回顾性方法对122例患者进行评估。主要终点为总生存期。患者接受4个疗程的新辅助化疗,然后以顺铂作为放射增敏剂进行根治性同步放化疗。结果:该人群的5年总生存率为80(66%),93例(76.3%)患者在治疗完成后完全缓解。亚群分析显示,在新辅助化疗后完全缓解的患者中,5年总生存率显著提高约104(85%)。结论:该研究得出结论,在特定人群中,膀胱保存是一种可接受的替代根治性膀胱切除术的方法,特别是那些对最初的四个疗程化疗有完全反应的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OUTCOME OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH BLADDER PRESERVATION PROTOCOL IN UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA OF URINARY BLADDER
Objective: To explore trimodality treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy as an alternative approach to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, for the treatment of non-metastatic muscle invasive bladder carcinoma. Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi Pakistan, from 2006 and 2015. Methodology: A total of 122 patients were evaluated in a retrospective manner. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Patients received four courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin as radiation sensitizer. Result: 5-year overall survival was 80 (66%) in this population and a complete response following completion of treatment was seen in 93 (76.3%) patients. Subset analysis showed markedly increased 5-year overall survival of around 104 (85%) in patients having complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion: The study concludes that bladder preservation is an acceptable alternative to radical cystectomy in selected population especially among those who had a complete response to the initial four courses of chemotherapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信