{"title":"大众科学和科学怀疑主义","authors":"O. A. Acar","doi":"10.1177/26339137231176480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science skepticism is widespread and on the rise. It is a strong threat to public well-being and global sustainability. In this paper, I argue that crowd science is a promising and underutilized tool to fight this threat. Drawing on recent behavioral research in marketing, I identify several positive psychological consequences of crowd science initiatives—both for the participants and observers of these initiatives—which could in turn promote stronger trust in science.","PeriodicalId":93948,"journal":{"name":"Collective intelligence","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crowd science and science skepticism\",\"authors\":\"O. A. Acar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26339137231176480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Science skepticism is widespread and on the rise. It is a strong threat to public well-being and global sustainability. In this paper, I argue that crowd science is a promising and underutilized tool to fight this threat. Drawing on recent behavioral research in marketing, I identify several positive psychological consequences of crowd science initiatives—both for the participants and observers of these initiatives—which could in turn promote stronger trust in science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collective intelligence\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collective intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137231176480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collective intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137231176480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Science skepticism is widespread and on the rise. It is a strong threat to public well-being and global sustainability. In this paper, I argue that crowd science is a promising and underutilized tool to fight this threat. Drawing on recent behavioral research in marketing, I identify several positive psychological consequences of crowd science initiatives—both for the participants and observers of these initiatives—which could in turn promote stronger trust in science.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
