基于KPI的模型质量保证和质量控制的标准化静态地质建模实践

P. Dhote, T. Al-Adwani, M. Al-Bahar, Ahmad Al-otaibi, S. Chakraborty, Slobodan Stojić
{"title":"基于KPI的模型质量保证和质量控制的标准化静态地质建模实践","authors":"P. Dhote, T. Al-Adwani, M. Al-Bahar, Ahmad Al-otaibi, S. Chakraborty, Slobodan Stojić","doi":"10.2523/IPTC-19123-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Subsurface petroleum industry is burdened with uncertainties in every aspect from exploration to production due to limitations of accessibility to reservoir and technology. The most important tools used to understand, quantify and mitigate the uncertainties are geostatistical static modeling and numerical dynamic simulation geomodels. Geomodels are widely used in the industry for characterizing the reservoir and planning favorable development strategy. It is vital instrument for maximizing asset value and optimize project economics.\n Static geomodels are foundation for all the advanced numerical and analytical solutions to solve the intricacies of reservoir performance. At the same time, it is where all the static and dynamic geological and engineering observations get integrated to develop common understanding of the reservoir for future studies. Understanding of the above observations and imaging of reservoir framework by individual is the basis for building static geomodels. Hence, at time, the process is highly subjective and proper QC'ing of the models to achieve the general and specific modeling objectives becomes imperative. Simple Questionaries’ based QC'ing and ranking methodologies are also controlled by subjectivity and individual preferences.\n In the present endeavor, quantitative ‘Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)’ based standard static geomodeling practices and QC'ing methodologies at corporate level are developed in specially designed \"Process Implementation Project (PIP) – Hydrocarbon resource and Uncertainty Management\"’ under the aegis of ‘Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) - Reservoir Management Best Practices Steering Committee'.\n The main objectives are to establish a practical modeling process, workflows and criteria to standardize modeling processes. A structured self-guidling modeling document has been developed with self-assemment guidelines and questionary. Finally, for each individual process a set of KPIs are specified as minimum standard to meet to obtain the approval of static model.\n The present efforts are important for any geologists, geomodelers and reservoir engineers dealing with geostatistical and numerical reservoir modeling and will provide the KPI's based general practices for quality assurance (QA) and QC'ing of the models.","PeriodicalId":11267,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","volume":"344 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KPI Based Standardizing Static Geomodeling Practices for QA and QC of Models\",\"authors\":\"P. Dhote, T. Al-Adwani, M. Al-Bahar, Ahmad Al-otaibi, S. Chakraborty, Slobodan Stojić\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/IPTC-19123-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Subsurface petroleum industry is burdened with uncertainties in every aspect from exploration to production due to limitations of accessibility to reservoir and technology. The most important tools used to understand, quantify and mitigate the uncertainties are geostatistical static modeling and numerical dynamic simulation geomodels. Geomodels are widely used in the industry for characterizing the reservoir and planning favorable development strategy. It is vital instrument for maximizing asset value and optimize project economics.\\n Static geomodels are foundation for all the advanced numerical and analytical solutions to solve the intricacies of reservoir performance. At the same time, it is where all the static and dynamic geological and engineering observations get integrated to develop common understanding of the reservoir for future studies. Understanding of the above observations and imaging of reservoir framework by individual is the basis for building static geomodels. Hence, at time, the process is highly subjective and proper QC'ing of the models to achieve the general and specific modeling objectives becomes imperative. Simple Questionaries’ based QC'ing and ranking methodologies are also controlled by subjectivity and individual preferences.\\n In the present endeavor, quantitative ‘Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)’ based standard static geomodeling practices and QC'ing methodologies at corporate level are developed in specially designed \\\"Process Implementation Project (PIP) – Hydrocarbon resource and Uncertainty Management\\\"’ under the aegis of ‘Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) - Reservoir Management Best Practices Steering Committee'.\\n The main objectives are to establish a practical modeling process, workflows and criteria to standardize modeling processes. A structured self-guidling modeling document has been developed with self-assemment guidelines and questionary. Finally, for each individual process a set of KPIs are specified as minimum standard to meet to obtain the approval of static model.\\n The present efforts are important for any geologists, geomodelers and reservoir engineers dealing with geostatistical and numerical reservoir modeling and will provide the KPI's based general practices for quality assurance (QA) and QC'ing of the models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019\",\"volume\":\"344 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19123-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19123-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于储层可及性和技术的限制,地下石油工业从勘探到生产的各个方面都存在着不确定性。用于理解、量化和减轻不确定性的最重要工具是地质统计静态建模和数值动态模拟地质模型。地质模型在工业上被广泛应用于储层表征和制定有利的开发战略。它是实现资产价值最大化、优化项目经济效益的重要工具。静态地质模型是解决复杂储层动态的所有先进数值和解析解决方案的基础。同时,所有的静态和动态地质和工程观测都得到了整合,为今后的研究建立了对储层的共同认识。个人对上述观测和储层格架成像的了解是建立静态地质模型的基础。因此,有时,这个过程是高度主观的,对模型进行适当的质量控制以实现一般和特定的建模目标变得势在必行。基于简单问卷的质量控制和排名方法也受主观性和个人偏好的控制。在目前的努力中,在科威特石油公司(KOC)油藏管理最佳实践指导委员会的支持下,在专门设计的“过程实施项目(PIP) -碳氢资源和不确定性管理”中,开发了基于标准静态地质建模实践和企业层面QC方法的定量“关键绩效指标(kpi)”。主要目标是建立一个实用的建模过程、工作流和标准来标准化建模过程。利用自组装指南和问题开发了一个结构化的自引导建模文档。最后,为每个单独的流程指定一组kpi作为需要满足的最低标准,以获得静态模型的批准。目前的工作对于处理地质统计和数值油藏建模的任何地质学家、地质建模师和油藏工程师都很重要,并将为模型的质量保证(QA)和质量控制提供基于KPI的通用实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KPI Based Standardizing Static Geomodeling Practices for QA and QC of Models
Subsurface petroleum industry is burdened with uncertainties in every aspect from exploration to production due to limitations of accessibility to reservoir and technology. The most important tools used to understand, quantify and mitigate the uncertainties are geostatistical static modeling and numerical dynamic simulation geomodels. Geomodels are widely used in the industry for characterizing the reservoir and planning favorable development strategy. It is vital instrument for maximizing asset value and optimize project economics. Static geomodels are foundation for all the advanced numerical and analytical solutions to solve the intricacies of reservoir performance. At the same time, it is where all the static and dynamic geological and engineering observations get integrated to develop common understanding of the reservoir for future studies. Understanding of the above observations and imaging of reservoir framework by individual is the basis for building static geomodels. Hence, at time, the process is highly subjective and proper QC'ing of the models to achieve the general and specific modeling objectives becomes imperative. Simple Questionaries’ based QC'ing and ranking methodologies are also controlled by subjectivity and individual preferences. In the present endeavor, quantitative ‘Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)’ based standard static geomodeling practices and QC'ing methodologies at corporate level are developed in specially designed "Process Implementation Project (PIP) – Hydrocarbon resource and Uncertainty Management"’ under the aegis of ‘Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) - Reservoir Management Best Practices Steering Committee'. The main objectives are to establish a practical modeling process, workflows and criteria to standardize modeling processes. A structured self-guidling modeling document has been developed with self-assemment guidelines and questionary. Finally, for each individual process a set of KPIs are specified as minimum standard to meet to obtain the approval of static model. The present efforts are important for any geologists, geomodelers and reservoir engineers dealing with geostatistical and numerical reservoir modeling and will provide the KPI's based general practices for quality assurance (QA) and QC'ing of the models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信